2k10's biggest flaw?
These player ratings are TRULY DISPICIBLE, agree?
The player ratings are terrible...Pathetic. Good game though.
WOOOOOW .........Players Are Rated 2 Low
Lakers Will Be Undefeatable In this game
OJ MAYO 78 Woow Barganani 68 lool
It has 2 be fake
LeBron and Wade a 96? Mayo and Gay 78? Durant 82? McGrady SEVENTYSEVEN? Gallinari 56? Howard 89?
Are they on crack?
I like that they did that. It makes the people who truly know how to play look good.
Last Year, Alot of teams had good players on the bench and often guys would get traded for no reason (Thad Young) in dynasty mode
Glad they did this...kinda like Madden 10 this year
how can Batum have 59 defense? hes one of the better defenders in the league and hes only gonna get better because hes only 18 or 19.
........who did he lock down last year?
He had a couple good defensive matchups....that's it
If you want his numbers to go up- prove it in the season/dynasty mode
Ok... this game values the Star's stats too much. There's no way Blake Griffin should have +3 overall rating than Rasheed Wallace without ever playing a single game
All I know, is that when i get this game im editing ALL the stars ratings ASAP, maybe even all the players. Probably edit some of the dunk packages, and jumpers also
LeBron's shooting up to 99
YUP tli I nticed that also, Mayo and Gay 78, Griffin 77?
dude he was the teams second best defender at the age of 19. he might not be one of the best defenders in the league but he has the ability to shot block (look what he did to Lebron and Wade and Gasol right in their faces) and hes a lock down defender i think hes really skinny and once h gains a little weight he could be all second team defense in a few years if not i think his defense could be a lot like Prince.
He's not good yet....
Also, Yea that was a mistake Griffin over Wallace was crazy but overall I like the fact there is not alot of 80 overall players
Batum is a VERY good defender. That's why he started. He actually did terrific all year long. I watched every Blazer game last year and I would say Batum is probably the 2nd or 3rd best defender with the most defensive potential next to Oden. Stats don't say everything man.
Steve DAMN Nash's DAMN rating was a DAMN eighty....................EIGHTY
Madden 10 was Nothing like this.....they rated players 2 high. Bryan Urlacher 92 , Merrmian Injured Half the year 93 and other Notables
dud he is good he should be in the 80 hes the only player on their team who can guard the Lebrons and Wades also hes one of the best small forward shotblockers in the league theres a reason why he started over Outlaw because of his amazing defense.
yeaa Nash 80 was hella low
But Bird is saying that his defense should be rated higher...i dont think it really makes a difference to me, he is a decent player and with the 2K10 lowering it's ratings...it should be a big deal
Also, Madden did have some a little high but overall, it did a good job to give realistic ratings.
He doesn't play much different now, then he did in his MVP seasons so, theyre basically saying he went from NBA's elite to just an avg. player in a few years
yeah but 69 is pretty bad it should at least be in the 70ies.
They are fairly low, though I always wanted a game that had ratings slightly subject to a players ability as a whole. Their are players in the NBA who are just straight up better than others who usually do not get their just due with how close the ratings are. I usually, and this is quite nerdy, end up changing players ratings in categories to what I best see fit. This tends to work out well, as I always find ratings to be somewhat awful in most every game I have ever owned.
Eric Gordon as 72 disappoints me. Should be at least 75 and Thornton deserves to be in the 70's. Davis at 82 are you kidding me? Whats with Hansbrough being the 4th highest on the Pacers? Hibbert and Rush need to be higher as well.
hey also didnt show Fernandez at 68.... thats pretty bad.
exactly, also, Nash had a 80 but alot of other players went down as well....
well mikeyv i do the same exact thing, i basically go through every players ratings and also jumpers, dunks , crossovers packages and take a couple DAYS adjusting everything, yes most ratings i think are terrible also
i know Tucker might deserve to be in the 60 but i had to laugh because i remember playing nba live from his rookie season and they &$#%#&@! up his score and put him at about 90 lol.
It allows dominate players to really dominate...
Also I think the stats are low Cause instead of the minium being 50 its 0 now not 100% sure though
But either Way My Created Vince from Shamwow Player will dominate
If you have X-box Live the ratings are gonna change so its no biggie
I'm not too worried about the ratings as long as the game plays at least as well as last years. I think the ratings are more like what happened with those in Madden 10. It should help with realism and superstars are truly going to dominate like superstars. Meaning that I won't be able to take some guy that is garbage and destroy teams with. I would say Yi was one of those guys in last years game for me. I mean if you want arcade style play NBA Live...09 was complete garbage.
im boosting up my boys ratings d-12 and jameer nelson. how dare they disrespect the best big man in the game. also i love 2k10 more than nba live but they kiss kobe ass this year because the lakers won the title . so they put him up to 97.im not saying thats bad . because he deserve to be that. but i know the lakers are gonna be so damn good on this game like last year. that you cant beat them.
yeah i agree is he really 10 points above Roy? i dont think so.
I know yall hate dirk on this forum
but really?? a 83
he is at least a 90
When I started playing the 2k10 draft combine game, i noticed that the player's rating go below 50 for the first time ever. I think they put the new ratings scale to take some of the "cheese" factors out of the game. They've also added new ratings such as consistency, ball security, off-hand dribbling and emotion. No more doing the super slow, ground-eating spin move 3 times in a row with guys who can't dribble, you're likely to lose the ball. They also have a description for each rating now.
im staying with 2k9 yall
fnck 2k10 it looks bad
brandon roy should ba a 94 not 87 hes a allstar
they changed the ratings, so everybody got spreaded out..dont get your panties in a bunch fellas
The game is gonna play the same...and young guys like Mayo, and Kevin Durant have a higher number in a stat called "potential" so they'll improve as you go along...
However, im not saying 2k10 got it right on this one....Rondo is better than Peirce and Allen? Nahh
But they also got a few things right...i mean Jerome James deserves a 42 lol
i agree even if qhaynes doesnt overvalue Rondo (which i dont belie) they obviously do.
Something does seem a little suspect... Every rookie that came up didn't have a photo lol. Rondo is rated better than Billups and Harris.
If these are true, then the only explanation is that they changed the rating system.
Rondo is not 5 points higher than KD .
KD at 82 is horrible .
Joe johnson is a 83 jr smith is a 72( thats lower than lawson) courney lee is a 68( lower than t will) Marvin williams is a 69
looks like they were smokin while making this
I liked that they made the ratings lower. A 78 would be like a 85 on 2k9 so they just gave everyone a lower rating I dont like all the ratings esspeacily Rondos and KDs but overall I think there pretty good.
i like how they decided to make them lower, they just made players better than others that shouldnt be..
its okay have lower rating but star players should be star player im mad a lamarcus and roy rating and durants and lebrons at lest make him a 97 he was the mvp last year not kobe and wade needs 2 b a 99 after what he did last year
When are they gonna make a player 99
its a slap in the face to rate lebron and wade a 96 and then kobe a 97 2k better switch those stats up and quick
Kobe shouldnt be 97 though... hes not 15 better KD.
Nobody should be a 99 truly....99 is like "the perfect player" and every player has his flaws...im actually glad that no one is a 99
i agree ^
nobody should be a 99, but im stil confused at KD..