i ws just wondering what kind of player you think its best to go after in the second round? for me its the upperclassmen who has a solid defensive game and had proved himself in the tournament, Chalmers, Moute, and Lee, you could get the next Ginoble, or Ellis but i think its better to go defensive with later picks. what do you think?
i think u cant wait until the school year starts..Getting awfully bored these days huh...
2nd round is for role players......And you might get lucky and get a star
most likely take the best overall player, or a weakness on your team depth wise.
you're right i am a little bored.
try going outside, play a little basketball or some football, try getting away from the computer for a while!
i did i havent posted at all today since like 10 minutes ago.
A lot of GMs go for potential n BOTH rounds, but if some1 like boozer or gilbert falls n ur lap u gotta take 'em, but yea I wuld go wif a tuff defensive guy
good for you. I was starting to wonder about you and knickboy, every time i come home and turn on the web you are always on. Not a problem though, dedication to the site. lol
yeah, but knicksboy34 recently has been attacked by some hater and he isnt on much.
too bad for him! Do you think your team portland will runaway with the northwest division, or do the nuggets and jazz have a shot at the division?
i think it will be tight with those three teams im not sure who will win it.
I've never been a fan of people who think acertain way about drafting like always taking potential, or a proven player, or a guy who fills a need. As a GM, you have to look at each player individually, take all those things into consideration, and then make the best pick possible and stick with it. And I like the Nuggets to win the northwest.
should be for role players but it is really just for spark talent lately