share
Home › Forums › Basketball › NBA Draft ›

2010 Version of the Classic Debate Potential vs. Proof: Paul George vs. Evan Turner

Posted on: Sun, 08/02/2009 at 3:00pm
GreenLantern
GreenLantern's picture
Registered User
Joined: 05/26/2009
Posts: 488
Points: 510
Offline
2010 Version of the Classic Debate Potential vs. Proof: Paul George vs. Evan Turner

If you had say the #5 pick on down in the lottery, and these two players of the same postion were on the board right row, who would you take, Paul George of Fresno State or Evan Turner of Ohio State? History says the proven commodity is the better option most times, and Evan Turner is an absolute stud and a lock for the lotto. George it seems has been gaining fans through his highlighted feats of athleticism and seems gifted but has yet to prove he is worthy of a high selection on a legit stage. This question is more about the principle of potential/proven player as a draft strategy. What do yall think?


Posted on: Sun, 08/02/2009 - 2:01pm
Knicks21
Registered User
Joined: 08/01/2009
Posts: 85
Points: 45
Offline
Good post. I would take

Good post. I would take George. I see Kobe Bryant like ability from him. Evan Turner is solid but I dont see the "superstar" in his game.

Posted on: Sun, 08/02/2009 - 2:06pm
billyk
Registered User
Joined: 12/05/2008
Posts: 1017
Points: 546
Offline
I would take Evan Turner

I would take Evan Turner because he is a very mature player (can step in right away and contribute), has good size (SG or SF), played in a rugged confrence (and produced), and I think he has less of a bust factor....

Posted on: Sun, 08/02/2009 - 2:11pm
GreenLantern
GreenLantern's picture
Registered User
Joined: 05/26/2009
Posts: 488
Points: 510
Offline
Even though

Even though I would be more comfortable taking Turner knicks21, what you said makes sense to me. I think Turner will be somewhere between James Harden's ceiling and Brandon Roy. George? Who knows? He could be Isaiah Thomas great or Isaiah Rider terrible. It's completely up in the air to me. I guess who you pick is based on what type of person you are and what type of team you already have. For example if I had a team without an established superstar or star, I go for broke with George. If I'm looking for a "right fit" to go along with my young all-star(s) I go with the guy used to playing on a good team on a big stage- Evan Turner.

Posted on: Sun, 08/02/2009 - 2:33pm
Meditated States
Registered User
Joined: 04/29/2009
Posts: 2875
Points: 609
Offline
I would go

with Turner for now. This would change if George puts up monster numbers in his conference. He should destroy the WAC.

Posted on: Sun, 08/02/2009 - 3:31pm
apb540
apb540's picture
Registered User
Joined: 06/08/2009
Posts: 2356
Points: 1851
Offline
Great Post

This year will definitely determine who will come out on top of this battle, but I will say Paul George for now. Don't forget about Devin Ebanks either...

Posted on: Sun, 08/02/2009 - 9:07pm
Adi Joseph
Registered User
Joined: 06/22/2008
Posts: 460
Points: 512
Offline
The problem with this post
The problem with this post is that George still has a season to prove himself.
Posted on: Sun, 08/02/2009 - 9:10pm
Michael.S.
Registered User
Joined: 05/10/2009
Posts: 5992
Points: 1962
Offline
he did title the post 2010

he did title the post
2010 Version of the Classic Debate Potential vs. Proof: Paul George vs. Evan Turner
though

RSS: Syndicate content