High Risk/Reward Picks
Every year, NBA teams spend massive amounts of time getting to know as much as they can about every prospect they’re interested in. The thing is, it’s still an inexact science. No matter how much time and resources a team pours into a prospect, there are no guarantees when it comes to the draft. Sometimes the teams get a keeper, but there’s always a chance the team’s next draft pick could go the way of Denver’s Nikoloz Tskitishvili or Charlotte’s Adam Morrison. This year’s draft is no different, and a few of the prospects have boom or bust (depending on who you ask) written all over them, such as:
Brooks is a 6-5 guard with a 7-1 wingspan who was essentially a one man team his senior year at Providence. He averaged a whopping 24.6 points per game, second only to some guy named Jimmer. Playing for a bottom-tier team in a conference of heavyweights meant Brooks was hidden from casual fans. He changed that by scoring 43 points against Georgetown on February 5. He then showed that it was no fluke, as he topped it four games later, dropping 52 on eventual NCAA two seed Notre Dame. Despite his scoring acumen, Providence failed to post a winning record, finishing 15-17, and 4-14 in the conference.
The biggest concern for any team looking at drafting Brooks has to be whether they can rein him in and develop him into a player who can do things besides score. Last season, he had no conscience when it came to shot selection, leading him to take a lot of ill-advised shots. He obviously didn’t trust his teammates to make things happen offensively, and it remains to be seen if that will change once he is surrounded by NBA level players. If he’s willing to defer more to his teammates at the next level he could have a great career as a wing scorer, but if he can’t take a step back from the way he played last season, he could find himself being viewed as the next J.R. Smith. There has been a lot of talk about the Celtics being interested in him if he drops to them late in the first round of the draft, which would be the ideal situation, as he could learn from Doc Rivers, Paul Pierce, and Ray Allen.
The Nike Hoop Summit is responsible for putting this young man in the limelight, as he put on a shot blocking and rebounding exhibition in the game. International scouts new about him, but he was a fairly well kept secret from most fans. He stands 6-9, but has a freakishly long wingspan of 7-7 allowing him to alter shots nearly any shot inside. He has a terrific motor and plays an intense brand of basketball that could potentially allow him to make a big impact in the NBA. His lack of any real offensive game could be a significant hurdle for him to overcome, though. There are also questions about his age, as he’s listed at 18, but there have been rumors that he’s anywhere from 17 to 26, which would make teams question how much potential he may have.
There is a good chance he could develop into a Serge Ibaka-Ben Wallace hybrid, which would be downright scary, but it’s far from a sure thing. However, defense and rebounding are two skills that generally transfer well to the NBA game, so it will come down to him being drafted into the right situation. It’s going to take some time to develop his offensive game, but he could end up being a quality player.
Selby was supposed to be the next big thing at Kansas as the guard complement to the Morris twins after he de-committed from Tennessee. However, he never lived up to expectations due to suspension, injury and not being a good fit for Bill Self’s offense. In his lone year in Lawrence, he averaged an unimpressive 7.9 points and 2.2 assists per game. He’s a bit of a combo guard in terms of his NBA position, as he doesn’t have a great feel for the point guard position and doesn’t have ideal size to play off the ball.
However, Selby does have some upside that teams may feel warrant taking a flier on in the second half of the first round. He is very athletic with explosive leaping ability that can present problems for defenses. He especially excels in breaking down defenders in one-on-one situations. He has a good enough jumpshot that he can keep guys from playing him exclusively for the drive and he has a high ceiling in terms of potential. Ultimately, the quality of his NBA career will come down to what team picks him, as he will need to find a team that allows him to play his style as a scoring point guard.
Richmond spent only one, unimpressive year at Illinois before hightailing it for the NBA. He has good size, standing 6-7 and has good instincts with the ball in his hands. I watched him in person during his senior year of high school, and he has the ability to be a real playmaker at the next level. He has elite athleticism and is one of the best passers I’ve seen. He is skilled at making the no look and wrap around passes that you see LeBron James make in traffic. When he is able to use his physical gifts to get by his man or post up smaller players he can punish the defense. However, his lack of a perimeter game will make it difficult for him to take full advantage of his physical gifts.
The biggest question with him, as far as NBA teams are concerned, is the mental aspect. He left the Illini after an uninspiring freshman season despite almost universal agreement that he needed to spend more time in the collegiate ranks. There are many aspects of his game that need a lot of work, as he is a capable slasher that lacks the skills to create driving lanes for himself. He’s likely to spend some time playing in the D-league. He is young and has the ability to become a productive player, it will come down to how hard he works to develop those skills, though.
Tyler was supposed to be the next big thing, as a man among boys at the high school level. Growing tired of dealing with being the focus of constant double and triple teams, he decided to take a page out of the Brandon Jennings playbook, skipped college (and his senior year) to play overseas. He sparked a national debate on whether it was a good idea to allow young men to take that route. After his failed experiment, it’s unlikely we’ll see that route taken again anytime soon. He played 10 games in Israel, frustrating his coaches and teammates with his immaturity, before leaving. He then moved on to play in Japan, where he had some moderate success.
He has the size teams look for, at 6-10, 260 lbs. He certainly hurt his stock by disappearing overseas instead of following through on his commitment to Louisville and spending a year or more in college. It’s difficult to see how much his game has grown as he hasn’t been able to play a ton of minutes or against NBA level competition, meaning his workouts for teams take on added importance. He’ll also have to dispel the perception as being immature in his interviews with teams. He’s fighting an uphill battle to establish himself, but he has the size that teams look for, so he stand a good chance of being drafted inthe mid to late first round.
Those five players aren’t the only ones that teams will be taking an extra hard look at. Forward Tristan Thompson of Texas has shown the ability to be a contributor at the next level, but was inconsistent in his one season in college. He recorded a 17-10-7 stat line in round one of the NCAA’s but totally disappeared in round two. Tyler Honeycutt of UCLA was expected to be a big time performer at the college level, but never was able to put it all together. He has great size and the ability to be a starter at the next level, but should be looked at as a project player to begin his career. Willie Reed will have teams especially focusing on him as a person, as he was suspended from Saint Louis after being accused of rape. He showed ability on the court, and maintains his innocence off of it, but NBA teams no doubt will be doing their homework on him in advance of the draft.
Any of these players could end up being all-stars or d-leaguers, it’s hard to tell until we see where they end up being picked June 23rd.
I like the list a lot. It contains two guys I'd like my Bulls to take a look at. I'd really like Marshon Brooks, if he either slips to 28 or if we use 28 and 30 to move up in the late teens. I also wouldn't mind if they took a shot at Jereme Richmond at 43. I followed him quite a bit when he was in high school b/c I live fairly close to where he went to high school. He's got a lot of potential but is extremely raw and the protypical high risk high upside kid.
Brooks, Tyler and Biyombo are my favourites from this list, i have them going 18th, 19th and 20th respectively
I'm higher than most on Richmond, he runs like a deer and could be a very good point forward while running the break. You hit the nail on the head about his weaknesses, but I think his upside is enough for any team to roll the dice in the 2nd round, even as high as 35-40
It appears Eric Yearian doesn't know what he's talking about.
Marshon Brooks does not belong on that list.
Marshon shot 48.3% from the field this past season, which is an excellent % for a guard prospect.
He did not take bad shots! He took makeable shots (for him) and converted them at a very respectable rate.
He also does more than score. He's an excellent defensive wing prospect who averaged 7.0 rebounds, 1.5 steals and 1.2 blocked shots.
Name another guard prospect who averaged over 7.0 rebounds and 1.2 blocked shots.
He destroyed both Klay Thompson (Indiana workout) and Alec Burks (Milwaukee, Charlotte workouts).
The guy should be lottery.
I appreciate the kinds words, and glad you enjoyed the list. Just for some context I thought I'd mention where I have the guys from the list in my mock draft, as of a week before the draft.
Brooks: 15th Biyombo:13th Selby:25th Richmond:47th Tyler: 22nd Thompson:8th
And Buckshot, Richmond was something at Waukegan, wasn't he. He could end up being a special player if he can develop his outside game. He has all of the physical tools teams look for.
I know everyone always says "he's the premier college shooter with ideal size" about Klay thompson, but on paper it looks like he's nothing special.. 43% fg 83% ft 39% 3p.. he's not an outstanding athlete either.. and that will expose him a ton in the super athletic NBA.. I would think proposing taking him top 15 would be far more risky... compared to brooks (who can create his own shots out of nothing, and frequently did) shot 48% from the floor this year! I agree with cyclo here.. brooks should not be on this list.. he has the skills and physical tools to compete effectively at the next level.. There's just not a lot of risk there..
Yes he definitely has the physical attributes that could make him a very special player. The problem with him though is whether or not he has the mentality to become a special player. He obviously has the size and athleticism, now we need to see the work ethic it takes to become a great player. He's a big time project, but a project that could reap huge rewards. Whatever team drafts him must help him develop a mid-range game. If they do, he will be a monster.
Don't really think most of the doubts on Brooks are fair. I mean, it was Providence. Only way that team was going to win any games whatsoever is if they were the same Providence from Generator Rex and carried guns onto the basketball court. What was he supposed to do? He was head and shoulders the best player on the team.
That's who should take a lot of shots. Some were ill-advised, but lots of great NBA players do the same thing, but people forgive them, because they're great. And part of the reason they became great was because they took a lot and made a lot of shots. Already been said he's not an inefficent player to boot.
Don't see a great deal of bust potential unless he doesn't work for it.
Would LOVE to see my Hornets trade back into the 1st just to grab him.
thanks for sharing..
thank you very much...i need it since so long..
Hey real good call on Brooks Mr Cyclo.
For someone to say he didn't take bad shots in college you either
(A) did not see him play much
(B) do not know what a bad shot is
I live in RI and have been a PC season ticket holder my whole life. I literally saw every college game Brooks played in and he chucked up a ton of contested shots with plenty of time on the shot clock. It doesn't matter if your Jordan, a contested shot with time on the SC is a BAD SHOT.
He is also a terrible team player. He would prefer to score 30 in a loss than 10 in a win.