share

Where will the new point guards fit?

sheltwon3
sheltwon3's picture
Registered User
Joined: 03/30/2009
Posts: 6364
Points: 2607
Offline
Where will the new point guards fit?

Even if you agree with my order and I know people will, I am asking where Flynn, Curry, Jennings, Lawson, and other rookie point guards will fit on this system. Derek Fisher is at the bottom because he can't be traded because of the reasons he is in LA.

Point Guard Ranking System (trade value)
1. Derick Rose
2. Chris Paul
3. Deron Williams
4. Tony Parker
5. Rajon Rondo
6. Jose Caulderon
7. Steve Nash
8. Gilbert Arenas
9. Ramon Sessions
10. Devin Harris
11. Jameer Nelson
12. Russell Westbrook
13. Chauncey Billups
14. Mike Bibby
15. Raymond Felton
16. Andre Miller
17. Mike Conley
18. Baron Davis
19. Jason Kidd
20. Mo Williams
21. Kirk Hinrich
22. DJ Augustine
23. TJ Ford
24. Jarrett Jack
25. Aaron Brooks
26. Rodney Stuckney
27. Mario Chalmers
28. Kyle Lowry
29. Kenyon Dooling
30. Steve Blake
31. Luke Ridnour
32. Nate Robinson
33. Delonte West
34. Lou Williams
35. Rafer Alston
36. CJ Watson
37. Will Bynum
38. Sergio Rodriguez
39. Benu Udrich
40. Javaris Crittenton
41. Mike James
42. George Hill
43. Sebastian Telfair
44. Earl Watson
45. Mike Taylor
46. Chris Duhon
47. Jose Juan Barea
48. Jordan Farmar
49. Anthony Johnson
50. Royal Ivey
51. Antonio Daniels
52. Anthony Carter
53. Chucky Atkins
54. Stephon Marbury
55. Jamal Tinsley
56. Derek Fisher


d-grizzly
Registered User
Joined: 05/05/2009
Posts: 1511
Points: 635
Offline
flynn and curry

i would imagine flynn and curry between 24-32

Knicksboy34
Knicksboy34's picture
Registered User
Joined: 06/07/2009
Posts: 2876
Points: -98
Offline
Flynn- Bewteen 30 and 40

Flynn- Bewteen 30 and 40

Curry- 29th

, Jennings- bewteen 30 and 35

, Lawson- 40 to 50

jgunna
jgunna's picture
Registered User
Joined: 06/29/2009
Posts: 27
Points: 58
Offline
are you serious????

Westbrook, Calderon, Arenas, Sessions, Nelson, and Harris above Billups, and u have Rose ranked #1????????????? Anybody agreeing w/you has issues.

Knicksboy34
Knicksboy34's picture
Registered User
Joined: 06/07/2009
Posts: 2876
Points: -98
Offline
jgunna! join my new b-ball

jgunna!

join my new b-ball website man! http://qhaynes123.webs.com/

RickyRubio9
RickyRubio9's picture
Registered User
Joined: 07/01/2008
Posts: 2080
Points: 1069
Offline
Brooks

is higher then some of the ones above him, Rose has the most value at his age? No...I'd put him 4 behind a TP, CP3, and Williams. All still young TP being the oldest, but most proven. That's who has the most trade value. I don't care to look over the list and find all the flaws in my opinion, but that's just after looking at the top 10.

j1232e
Registered User
Joined: 05/26/2009
Posts: 1501
Points: 1144
Offline
I see

That sessions in still in your top 10. Why is his value right now 3-5 million a year. Shouldn't a top 10 pg in the league earn more than that. Sessions maybe top 20.

gregoden08
gregoden08's picture
Registered User
Joined: 05/25/2009
Posts: 974
Points: 1047
Offline
lol

Jack ahead of Stuckey? Really now? Sessions above Harris? Lol that's a joke.

sheltwon3
sheltwon3's picture
Registered User
Joined: 03/30/2009
Posts: 6364
Points: 2607
Offline
Everyone has their opinions.

Everyone has their opinions. And some players were hard to decide on Harris and Session can go both ways but I like Sessions as better distributor and Harris has had more time in and I feel that Sessions and he are close in levels so Sessions got the edge. Artest and Ariza both got Mid level. There is not enough money for and virtual unknown to demand that much. NBA is about hype. Players get paid or not paid based on it. If there is no money that changes things. There will be some great bargains. Jgunna I understand your views but that does make you right anyone can be a critic. Also older players value can not be that high especially when they don't take over games as much no matter how great of a leader they are. Rose is almost on Chris Paul and Deron Williams level. He is younger and bigger than Paul and more explosive than both. Utah and New Orleans would strongly consider trading their players for Rose.The was toss up but the key point is where the new point guards will go. If you read what I said I already mentioned that I believed many would not like my list. Think about it everyone's list would be different. I feel like Sessions is close to billups skill set and size already and he is younger and it took Billups longer to get to where he was decent. You would always take young over old unless young is not that good and old can play more than 2 years.

sheltwon3
sheltwon3's picture
Registered User
Joined: 03/30/2009
Posts: 6364
Points: 2607
Offline
Jarrett Jack played better

Jarrett Jack played better than Stuckney last year and has decent size. I like Harris but he was in a offense that was geared around him and he has yet to have games that made you go wow on the level of Sessions. Sessions did some things in his first few years and this is the beginning. I could go either way on that one but I liked Sessions a little more in that regard.

sheltwon3
sheltwon3's picture
Registered User
Joined: 03/30/2009
Posts: 6364
Points: 2607
Offline
Lol @ Brook being higher.

Lol @ Brook being higher. Dude is pretty much a shooting guard in a point guards body. He has potential as a playmaker but he is not there yet and he cant really guard bigger players.

sheltwon3
sheltwon3's picture
Registered User
Joined: 03/30/2009
Posts: 6364
Points: 2607
Offline
I like Brooks as a player

I like Brooks as a player but don't get caught up in playoff hype.

gregoden08
gregoden08's picture
Registered User
Joined: 05/25/2009
Posts: 974
Points: 1047
Offline
It's not about

How well they played last year. Stuckey clearly has more potential than Jack. Therefore, he should be higher than Jack.

sheltwon3
sheltwon3's picture
Registered User
Joined: 03/30/2009
Posts: 6364
Points: 2607
Offline
The jury is still out on

The jury is still out on that one because Jack played better than I thought he was capable and he can run a team right now. That potential thing sometimes can be overblown because Jack has good potential too. I should have put Stuckney ahead of Brooks though. But my thing is it is that close and that is the one you want to complain about, they are too spots difference. It would different if I had someone that was good really down there then I could see the argument. I guess if that is the worst people can say about a list i was able to put together as far as order wise in like 10 minutes than that is cool. This is a list i used before the draft though and only change one thing after because my thing is I feel it is good. I will probably add the rookie and I wanted some feedback. I will say this print out my list and reference it when the season starts and then tell me if i did not know what i was talking bout.

RSS: Syndicate content