Where will the new point guards fit?

i would imagine flynn and curry between 24-32

Flynn- Bewteen 30 and 40

Curry- 29th

, Jennings- bewteen 30 and 35

, Lawson- 40 to 50

Westbrook, Calderon, Arenas, Sessions, Nelson, and Harris above Billups, and u have Rose ranked #1????????????? Anybody agreeing w/you has issues.

jgunna!

join my new b-ball website man! http://qhaynes123.webs.com/

is higher then some of the ones above him, Rose has the most value at his age? No...I'd put him 4 behind a TP, CP3, and Williams. All still young TP being the oldest, but most proven. That's who has the most trade value. I don't care to look over the list and find all the flaws in my opinion, but that's just after looking at the top 10.

That sessions in still in your top 10. Why is his value right now 3-5 million a year. Shouldn't a top 10 pg in the league earn more than that. Sessions maybe top 20.

Jack ahead of Stuckey? Really now? Sessions above Harris? Lol that's a joke.

Everyone has their opinions. And some players were hard to decide on Harris and Session can go both ways but I like Sessions as better distributor and Harris has had more time in and I feel that Sessions and he are close in levels so Sessions got the edge. Artest and Ariza both got Mid level. There is not enough money for and virtual unknown to demand that much. NBA is about hype. Players get paid or not paid based on it. If there is no money that changes things. There will be some great bargains. Jgunna I understand your views but that does make you right anyone can be a critic. Also older players value can not be that high especially when they don't take over games as much no matter how great of a leader they are. Rose is almost on Chris Paul and Deron Williams level. He is younger and bigger than Paul and more explosive than both. Utah and New Orleans would strongly consider trading their players for Rose.The was toss up but the key point is where the new point guards will go. If you read what I said I already mentioned that I believed many would not like my list. Think about it everyone's list would be different. I feel like Sessions is close to billups skill set and size already and he is younger and it took Billups longer to get to where he was decent. You would always take young over old unless young is not that good and old can play more than 2 years.

Jarrett Jack played better than Stuckney last year and has decent size. I like Harris but he was in a offense that was geared around him and he has yet to have games that made you go wow on the level of Sessions. Sessions did some things in his first few years and this is the beginning. I could go either way on that one but I liked Sessions a little more in that regard.

Lol @ Brook being higher. Dude is pretty much a shooting guard in a point guards body. He has potential as a playmaker but he is not there yet and he cant really guard bigger players.

I like Brooks as a player but don't get caught up in playoff hype.

How well they played last year. Stuckey clearly has more potential than Jack. Therefore, he should be higher than Jack.

The jury is still out on that one because Jack played better than I thought he was capable and he can run a team right now. That potential thing sometimes can be overblown because Jack has good potential too. I should have put Stuckney ahead of Brooks though. But my thing is it is that close and that is the one you want to complain about, they are too spots difference. It would different if I had someone that was good really down there then I could see the argument. I guess if that is the worst people can say about a list i was able to put together as far as order wise in like 10 minutes than that is cool. This is a list i used before the draft though and only change one thing after because my thing is I feel it is good. I will probably add the rookie and I wanted some feedback. I will say this print out my list and reference it when the season starts and then tell me if i did not know what i was talking bout.