I just finished watching the game and i must say i was surprised at the out come.
Honeycutt and Nelson looked pretty bad as well as just about everyone else on the team.
Montana had a guard named Cherry who was getting what he wanted as well as a big man (quayles) who had a double double.
Yea its gonna be a long year in the Pac-10 which i expected. within the next two years though i expect it to change
On a good note USC took out texas
It has been a year on inconsistency for the Pac-10. Still, I am happier with how this year has started as compared to last year when every Pac-10 team was dropping non-con games like flies. The Ducks have even played there hearts out. Also, it sounds ridiculous when you say "The Grizz beat UCLA", but they made the tournament last year. While they do not have the NBA prospects UCLA has, as a team they are coming off a better season than UCLA. One thing I do agree on is that the Pac-10 is likely a year or two away from being one of basketball's power conferences again. By the way, where did that USC win come from? Crushing Texas after losing to Rider, Bradley, Nebraska and TCU? OK. Vucevic had a huge game, and they are not a bad team, but they dropped Texas totally. Well, I am hoping for three schools to get into the tourney this year, and 4 would be incredible. Also, hopefully that Kansas loss didn't cripple UCLA too badly, it was a heartbreaker.
It's not quite as bad as it looks, even though it is a kinda bad loss. Montana was a tourny team last year.
I dont think it looks that bad because i was never high on UCLA. Might be worst for those who truley believed that this team was a top 25 team