share

Trade idea

whatever
Registered User
Joined: 10/09/2010
Posts: 121
Points: 169
Offline
Trade idea

Sixers trade: Iguodala and Brackins and get Kaman and Rush

Sixers

PG Holiday (Williams)

SG Brandon Rush (Turner) (Meeks)

SF Young (Nocioni) (Kapono)

PF Brand (Songaila)

C Chris Kaman (Hawes) (Speights)

The sixers get a solid starting center and move Iguodala to help Turner develop. They also get Rush as a backup plan if Turner doesn’t come through.

Clippers trade: Kaman and Warren and get Dunleavy and Jones

PG Davis (Bledsoe)

SG Gordon (Butler) (Foye)

SF Mike Dunleavy (Aminu) (Gomes)

PF Griffin (Smith) (Diougu)

C Jordan (Solomon Jones) (Collins)

The Clippers get an upgrade in SF position with Dunleavy and move Kaman to help Jordan and his chemistry with Griffin to keep developing. They also get a backup center in Solomon Jones.

Pacers trade: Dunleavy, Solomon Jones and Rush and get Iguodala, Warren and Brackins

PG Collison (Ford) (Price)

SG Andre Iguodala (Jones) (Willie Warren)

SF Granger (George) (Craig Brackins)

PF McRoberts (Posey) (Hansbrough)

C Hibbert (Foster)

The Pacers get an upgrade in the sg position and get Igoudala to play along with Granger and company plus 2 third options in the sg and sf positions.


royk927
Registered User
Joined: 06/22/2010
Posts: 212
Points: 120
Offline
this doesnt even benfit the clippers.

If the Clipps trade Kaman it should be for a pick and a servicable backup (Solomon Jones is neither). The clipps potentially just like the thunder have the most dangerous line up going forward. While i agree that they should move Kaman and Davis it should be for things that will help. Bledsoe, Gordon, Aminu (he has shown he can hit the three ball efficently and not that bad defensivly), Griffin , Jordan Starting line up. (Diugo, Smith, warren plus a back up big (maybe Thabeett from memphis and a backup point guard and they could be one of the top teams along with the thunder in the west.

Rico
Registered User
Joined: 05/28/2009
Posts: 101
Points: 34
Offline
Kaman for Iggy

If the 76ers would move Iggy for Kaman, wouldn't the Clippers just take Iggy? Why is Indiana involved in this? Why would the Clippers settle for Dunleavy when they can get Iggy?

whatever
Registered User
Joined: 10/09/2010
Posts: 121
Points: 169
Offline
Well yes maybe it seems like

Well yes maybe it seems like the clippers are getting the worst part of the deal but maybe taking warren out of the deal (it still makes sense financially) would be not such a bad deal think about it Kaman just cloggs the paint for griffin it u take a look back when the Clippers were playing with kaman and griffin together they looked awfull, they actually had their longest losing streak. Kamans injury was actually a hidden blessing 4 them since they are way better since he is out. Then probably the sixers wouldnt be atracted in trading iguodala just 4 kaman, here is where the pacers com into the picture they can offer a good backup plan in rush (which clippers cannot offer, they wont trade gordon 4 iggy thats a fact and butler is not good enough). Then the Clippers get Dunleavy who is a shooter that is what the clippers need desperetly since the clipps are the team with the highest percentage of their points coming from the paint (which makes them predictable and easy to defend) instead of iggy who is more of a penetrator and inciator and also get a backup center who is actually better than the current one (Collins). But off course if the sixers agreed the clippers probably wouldnt doubt 4 a second in taking iggy rather than mike

RSS: Syndicate content