This topic contains 18 replies, has 3 voices, and was last updated by BigD 13 years, 2 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Mon, 01/03/2011 - 12:16pm #24552
JeallyBean_Jordan23ParticipantFor real which trade is best?
1. http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=24degr3
2. when Denver begins to rebuild when Melo leaves: http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=29pkwup
3. gives Cleveland a bit more spending money: http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=29wp84v
4. for Clippers, who want to get younger and bild: http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=2ab9n6z
5. Wes Johnson is the future SF in Minnesota: http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=29kqlna
1, 2,3, 4, or 5
0 - Posted on: Mon, 01/03/2011 - 12:34pm #469729
BigDParticipantTrade 1- Thunder need legit size, not another undersized big
Trade 2- Isn’t so bad actually, Denver might want more for JR though.
Trade 3- Cleveland would want more for Varejao unfortunately
Trade 4- Same as above, LAC would want more
Trade 5- If Johnson is future SF you say, why do they get Green?? Why would Beasley go to Thunder if he is SF? Beasley will probably stay in Minnsota with Johnson for the time being
0 - Posted on: Mon, 01/03/2011 - 12:34pm #469744
BigDParticipantTrade 1- Thunder need legit size, not another undersized big
Trade 2- Isn’t so bad actually, Denver might want more for JR though.
Trade 3- Cleveland would want more for Varejao unfortunately
Trade 4- Same as above, LAC would want more
Trade 5- If Johnson is future SF you say, why do they get Green?? Why would Beasley go to Thunder if he is SF? Beasley will probably stay in Minnsota with Johnson for the time being
0 - Posted on: Mon, 01/03/2011 - 12:40pm #469731
JeallyBean_Jordan23Participant5 is the way it is because Michael Beasley is a much better rebounder than Jeff Green and he plays stronger against bigs. For Minnesota, I was thinking Jeff Green gives them a starter until they feel Wesley Johnson is ready to start and he has an expiring contract. I guess since my first post was a joke due to boredom, people won’t take me seriously now
0 - Posted on: Mon, 01/03/2011 - 12:40pm #469746
JeallyBean_Jordan23Participant5 is the way it is because Michael Beasley is a much better rebounder than Jeff Green and he plays stronger against bigs. For Minnesota, I was thinking Jeff Green gives them a starter until they feel Wesley Johnson is ready to start and he has an expiring contract. I guess since my first post was a joke due to boredom, people won’t take me seriously now
0 - Posted on: Mon, 01/03/2011 - 12:54pm #469770
BigDParticipantJohnson already starts for the T-Wolves. and the Thunder would probably be better off having Ibaka as their future PF and somehow finding a legit and decent C.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 01/03/2011 - 12:54pm #469755
BigDParticipantJohnson already starts for the T-Wolves. and the Thunder would probably be better off having Ibaka as their future PF and somehow finding a legit and decent C.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 01/03/2011 - 2:25pm #469809
T-Wolvesfan13ParticipantI just don’t see as any of these as a good deal for both teams. 1 is alright. But i am pretty sure 2,3,4 would want more. And why would Minnesota give up one of our best plays and best scorer for a scrub and a 4th opition? Beasley is a much better player then Wes Johnson and he is younger so making that trade would be stupid.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 01/03/2011 - 2:25pm #469824
T-Wolvesfan13ParticipantI just don’t see as any of these as a good deal for both teams. 1 is alright. But i am pretty sure 2,3,4 would want more. And why would Minnesota give up one of our best plays and best scorer for a scrub and a 4th opition? Beasley is a much better player then Wes Johnson and he is younger so making that trade would be stupid.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 01/03/2011 - 2:25pm #469811
T-Wolvesfan13ParticipantI just don’t see as any of these as a good deal for both teams. 1 is alright. But i am pretty sure 2,3,4 would want more. And why would Minnesota give up one of our best plays and best scorer for a scrub and a 4th opition? Beasley is a much better player then Wes Johnson and he is younger so making that trade would be stupid.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 01/03/2011 - 2:25pm #469826
T-Wolvesfan13ParticipantI just don’t see as any of these as a good deal for both teams. 1 is alright. But i am pretty sure 2,3,4 would want more. And why would Minnesota give up one of our best plays and best scorer for a scrub and a 4th opition? Beasley is a much better player then Wes Johnson and he is younger so making that trade would be stupid.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 01/03/2011 - 9:17pm #469987
armanthunder needs to play green at sf,i know this is crazy but picture this lineup pg westbrook,sg durant,sf green,pf ibaka and c krstic….that is scary…durant can play sg cause he played alot in his rookie year and jeff green is almost allstar when he plays at sf…he just isnt pf… this would be the craziest team ever and those trades are just bad
0 - Posted on: Mon, 01/03/2011 - 9:17pm #470002
armanthunder needs to play green at sf,i know this is crazy but picture this lineup pg westbrook,sg durant,sf green,pf ibaka and c krstic….that is scary…durant can play sg cause he played alot in his rookie year and jeff green is almost allstar when he plays at sf…he just isnt pf… this would be the craziest team ever and those trades are just bad
0 - Posted on: Mon, 01/03/2011 - 9:19pm #469989
BigDParticipantDurant would get killed defensively. Thats why they moved him to SF in the first place.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 01/03/2011 - 9:19pm #470004
BigDParticipantDurant would get killed defensively. Thats why they moved him to SF in the first place.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 01/03/2011 - 9:24pm #469997
armanBut picture it…Its crazyy
0 - Posted on: Mon, 01/03/2011 - 9:24pm #470012
armanBut picture it…Its crazyy
0 - Posted on: Mon, 01/03/2011 - 9:27pm #470018
BigDParticipantOffensively it would be awesome i agree. But defensively, won’t get them a championship. Unless Durant really improves his defense.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 01/03/2011 - 9:27pm #470003
BigDParticipantOffensively it would be awesome i agree. But defensively, won’t get them a championship. Unless Durant really improves his defense.
0 - AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |