share

Thunder trade redos

JeallyBean_Jordan23
Registered User
Joined: 01/03/2011
Posts: 13
Points: -30
Offline
Thunder trade redos

For real which trade is best?

1. http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=24degr3

2. when Denver begins to rebuild when Melo leaves: http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=29pkwup

3. gives Cleveland a bit more spending money: http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=29wp84v

4. for Clippers, who want to get younger and bild: http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=2ab9n6z

5. Wes Johnson is the future SF in Minnesota: http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=29kqlna

1, 2,3, 4, or 5


BigD
Registered User
Joined: 12/08/2010
Posts: 573
Points: 817
Offline
Trade 1- Thunder need legit

Trade 1- Thunder need legit size, not another undersized big

Trade 2- Isn't so bad actually, Denver might want more for JR though.

Trade 3- Cleveland would want more for Varejao unfortunately

Trade 4- Same as above, LAC would want more

Trade 5- If Johnson is future SF you say, why do they get Green?? Why would Beasley go to Thunder if he is SF? Beasley will probably stay in Minnsota with Johnson for the time being

JeallyBean_Jordan23
Registered User
Joined: 01/03/2011
Posts: 13
Points: -30
Offline
Thank You

5 is the way it is because Michael Beasley is a much better rebounder than Jeff Green and he plays stronger against bigs. For Minnesota, I was thinking Jeff Green gives them a starter until they feel Wesley Johnson is ready to start and he has an expiring contract. I guess since my first post was a joke due to boredom, people won't take me seriously now

BigD
Registered User
Joined: 12/08/2010
Posts: 573
Points: 817
Offline
Johnson already starts for

Johnson already starts for the T-Wolves. and the Thunder would probably be better off having Ibaka as their future PF and somehow finding a legit and decent C.

T-Wolvesfan13
T-Wolvesfan13's picture
Registered User
Joined: 05/10/2010
Posts: 187
Points: 410
Offline
I just

I just don't see as any of these as a good deal for both teams. 1 is alright. But i am pretty sure 2,3,4 would want more. And why would Minnesota give up one of our best plays and best scorer for a scrub and a 4th opition? Beasley is a much better player then Wes Johnson and he is younger so making that trade would be stupid.

T-Wolvesfan13
T-Wolvesfan13's picture
Registered User
Joined: 05/10/2010
Posts: 187
Points: 410
Offline
I just

I just don't see as any of these as a good deal for both teams. 1 is alright. But i am pretty sure 2,3,4 would want more. And why would Minnesota give up one of our best plays and best scorer for a scrub and a 4th opition? Beasley is a much better player then Wes Johnson and he is younger so making that trade would be stupid.

arman
Registered User
Joined: 05/31/2009
Posts: 390
Points: -237
Offline
...

thunder needs to play green at sf,i know this is crazy but picture this lineup pg westbrook,sg durant,sf green,pf ibaka and c krstic....that is scary...durant can play sg cause he played alot in his rookie year and jeff green is almost allstar when he plays at sf...he just isnt pf... this would be the craziest team ever and those trades are just bad

BigD
Registered User
Joined: 12/08/2010
Posts: 573
Points: 817
Offline
Durant would get killed

Durant would get killed defensively. Thats why they moved him to SF in the first place.

arman
Registered User
Joined: 05/31/2009
Posts: 390
Points: -237
Offline
..

But picture it...Its crazyy

BigD
Registered User
Joined: 12/08/2010
Posts: 573
Points: 817
Offline
Offensively it would be

Offensively it would be awesome i agree. But defensively, won't get them a championship. Unless Durant really improves his defense.

RSS: Syndicate content