Thunder trade - NBADraft.net

This topic contains 14 replies, has 6 voices, and was last updated by flyboy 13 years, 2 months ago.

Author
Posts
Posted on: Wed, 02/23/2011 - 11:19am #26218

Russell0Westbrook
Participant
These are a couple ideas I have that could help the Thunder in the short term and long term process. The second trade I is a wish trade but if picks were added I could see the cavs accepting this deal because they are shedding cap space and getting a cheap hard worker in return and we all know as longs as the salary works Kahn will accept any trade not involving K. Love

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=6f9puc3
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=4f7msdb
0
Posted on: Wed, 02/23/2011 - 11:40am #498294

sheltwon3
Participant
Your first trade has promise but Memphis seems to like Young and and with Rudy hurt they may keep him and try to move Mayo.
Your second trade is a little far fetched.
0
Posted on: Wed, 02/23/2011 - 11:40am #498348

sheltwon3
Participant
Your first trade has promise but Memphis seems to like Young and and with Rudy hurt they may keep him and try to move Mayo.
Your second trade is a little far fetched.
0
Posted on: Wed, 02/23/2011 - 11:47am #498309

ghettosermon
Participant
Why in the world would the Cavs trade Jamison for Nick Collison. Not only is Jamison the better player which is moot point, but for a team rebuilding you tell me what they’d rather have 2 years left of Jamison, or 5 more years of Collison? If they end up keeping Jamison he will be a huge trade asset next year as a 13 mil expiring contract. Doesn’t hurt that in the short term he brings veteran leadership and heart.
0
Posted on: Wed, 02/23/2011 - 11:47am #498363

ghettosermon
Participant
Why in the world would the Cavs trade Jamison for Nick Collison. Not only is Jamison the better player which is moot point, but for a team rebuilding you tell me what they’d rather have 2 years left of Jamison, or 5 more years of Collison? If they end up keeping Jamison he will be a huge trade asset next year as a 13 mil expiring contract. Doesn’t hurt that in the short term he brings veteran leadership and heart.
0
Posted on: Wed, 02/23/2011 - 11:52am #498319

Russell0Westbrook
Participant
Because after this year collison on makes 2 mil a year
0
Posted on: Wed, 02/23/2011 - 11:52am #498373

Russell0Westbrook
Participant
Because after this year collison on makes 2 mil a year
0
Posted on: Wed, 02/23/2011 - 12:33pm #498471

ghettosermon
Participant
^^ Yeah for 4 more years. Jamison is a huge expiring next year plus he’s an actual starter. Cleveland is not in the position to simply make financial moves.
0
Posted on: Wed, 02/23/2011 - 12:33pm #498417

ghettosermon
Participant
^^ Yeah for 4 more years. Jamison is a huge expiring next year plus he’s an actual starter. Cleveland is not in the position to simply make financial moves.
0
Posted on: Wed, 02/23/2011 - 1:54pm #498549

abcdefghijkl
Participant
Your second trade works out but there is no way that the other teams would accept it.
0
Posted on: Wed, 02/23/2011 - 1:54pm #498604

abcdefghijkl
Participant
Your second trade works out but there is no way that the other teams would accept it.
0
Posted on: Wed, 02/23/2011 - 10:10pm #498615

BigD
Participant
Memphis won’t give up Sam Young for Daequan Cook
0
Posted on: Wed, 02/23/2011 - 10:10pm #498670

BigD
Participant
Memphis won’t give up Sam Young for Daequan Cook
0
Posted on: Thu, 02/24/2011 - 8:02am #498836

flyboy
Participant
Props on being creative, but neither trade is realistic.
0
Posted on: Thu, 02/24/2011 - 8:02am #498894

flyboy
Participant
Props on being creative, but neither trade is realistic.
0
Author
Posts

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.