share

Strong drafts turned weak

Windy City Assassin
Registered User
Joined: 03/11/2010
Posts: 6302
Points: 5527
Offline
Strong drafts turned weak

If I can recall right, the 2012 draft was considered a fairly strong draft before the collegiate season started. After the season ended once prospects started to declare the draft went from strong to weak almost instantly.

What do most on the site consider a strong draft at this point?


Memphis Madness
Registered User
Joined: 03/30/2011
Posts: 3322
Points: -925
Online
I would consider the 2014

I would consider the 2014 Andrew Wiggins draft to be strong.

A strong draft has superstars.

The BEST drafts have superstars AND depth.

Windy City Assassin
Registered User
Joined: 03/11/2010
Posts: 6302
Points: 5527
Offline
I agree with the 2014 class

I agree with the 2014 class being a strong draft. The thing I don't want to see happen, is majority of the One & Done prospects not live up to the hype when the collegiate season starts.

r377
r377's picture
Registered User
Joined: 12/28/2010
Posts: 1610
Points: 4564
Offline
I would call 2012 a solid

I would call 2012 a solid draft. Not alot of hall of famers or all-stars but was pretty deep meaning more players will have an "NBA career"

alinge
alinge's picture
Registered User
Joined: 08/24/2011
Posts: 288
Points: 1024
Offline
2007 was projected to be one

2007 was projected to be one of the all-time great drafts. Looking back it has so many busts it is ridiculous, although it has produced a likely hall of famer in Kevin Durant, not sure that outweighs Oden, Jianlian, Corey Brewer, Branden Wright, Spencer Hawes, Acie Law, Julian Wright and Al Thornton going in the lottery.

machu46
Registered User
Joined: 06/21/2012
Posts: 898
Points: 1427
Offline
Every year is basically the

Every year is basically the same. Everyone always says players should declare ASAP because the following year's draft is loaded with incoming freshman X, Y, and Z. Then the college season starts and people find flaws in these freshman's game that they didn't notice in their highlight packages and suddenly it becomes a weak draft that everyone should declare for because the following year's draft is so strong.

Having said that, Wiggins and Parker legitimately look like elite prospects, but it honestly wouldn't surprise me if everyone starts saying "Yeah, these couple of guys look like great choices at the top of the draft, but after that, it's a complete crapshoot. Next year's draft will be better!"

Windy City Assassin
Registered User
Joined: 03/11/2010
Posts: 6302
Points: 5527
Offline
You hit it on the nose with

You hit it on the nose with where I am trying to get with this thread.

Ghost01
Ghost01's picture
Registered User
Joined: 11/30/2010
Posts: 2720
Points: 1731
Offline
I think 2012 was pretty

I think 2012 was pretty disappointing due to the fact must "experts" were legitimately comparing Davis to Duncan and even Russell... I like Beal and Waiters, I like Drummond, and obviously Lillard has been great. But the class has a pretty low ceiling for the most part.

2007 was a good one. Legit disappointment at the top and a lot of lottery flops.

I'd argue 2009 was the opposite of this. Everyone thought Blake was a one man draft, but we got Harden, Tyreke, Curry, Jennings, Rubio, Lawson, a lot of pretty legit NBA players.

Chilbert arenas
Chilbert arenas's picture
Registered User
Joined: 06/22/2009
Posts: 2737
Points: 6442
Offline
I was about to say I thought

I was about to say I thought 2009 was one of the weakest drafts around and ended up being full of stars depth and a plethora of point guards.

Tongue-Out-Like-23
Tongue-Out-Like-23's picture
Registered User
Joined: 03/16/2010
Posts: 8302
Points: 11872
Offline
I don't think anybody thought

I don't think anybody thought this could be a "strong" draft much rather a "deep" draft. Big difference.

You can have a strong (i.e. 2003)
You can have a deep draft (i.e. 2012)
You can have a weak draft, (i.e. 2000)

RSS: Syndicate content