This topic contains 14 replies, has 8 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar bcscards1 9 years, 11 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #55218
    AvatarAvatar
    kinimodze
    Participant
    1. To NYK: J.Smith, L.Datome from Detroit; N.Pekovic, JJ.Barea and 2014 first(nr 14) from Minnesota;L. Amundson, two 2014 first (nr 16, 19) and future first Sacramento from Chicago
    2. To Chicago: C.Anthony
    3. To Detroit: G.Smith, C.Boozer, M.Dunleavy and 2 future seconds from Chicago
    4. To Minnesota: T.Chandler from NYK; J.Jerebko from Detroit; 2015 first from Chicago
    0
  • #896810
    AvatarAvatar
    Tyrober
    Participant

    This is quite confusing

    0
  • #896692
    AvatarAvatar
    Tyrober
    Participant

    This is quite confusing

    0
  • #896813
    AvatarAvatar
    Adam Bronze
    Participant

    There’s no way Detroit does this and there’s no way Chicago gets Melo for Boozer and a few late draft picks.

     

    0
  • #896696
    AvatarAvatar
    Adam Bronze
    Participant

    There’s no way Detroit does this and there’s no way Chicago gets Melo for Boozer and a few late draft picks.

     

    0
    • #896863
      AvatarAvatar
      esperanzafleet69
      Participant

       are you kidding? theres no way detroit does this?

      they get rid of josh smith, jerebko, and Datome.. for a chance at boozer for 1 year, mike dunleavy, and greg smith?? and i think they could just immediately amnesty boozer anyways since they havent used theirs yet (not sure on this, idk if they have to be the team that actually signed him or not, but either way it doesnt matter, 1 year is still worth it.).

       

      You are crazy if you think the pistons wouldnt do this. priority #1 for the new GM will be getting rid of Josh smith and this would be one of the better trades they could get for him.

       

       

       

       

       

       

      0
    • #896747
      AvatarAvatar
      esperanzafleet69
      Participant

       are you kidding? theres no way detroit does this?

      they get rid of josh smith, jerebko, and Datome.. for a chance at boozer for 1 year, mike dunleavy, and greg smith?? and i think they could just immediately amnesty boozer anyways since they havent used theirs yet (not sure on this, idk if they have to be the team that actually signed him or not, but either way it doesnt matter, 1 year is still worth it.).

       

      You are crazy if you think the pistons wouldnt do this. priority #1 for the new GM will be getting rid of Josh smith and this would be one of the better trades they could get for him.

       

       

       

       

       

       

      0
      • #896858
        AvatarAvatar
        BennyWestside
        Participant

         They couldnt amnesty Boozer because they were not the team that signed him, and to get rid of all of those bad contracts they wouldnt get any value. To be honest, the Detroit part lines up in my mind. However, CHI cant get Melo for dropping as little as they did. They would be giving up all of their picks this year as well

        0
      • #896973
        AvatarAvatar
        BennyWestside
        Participant

         They couldnt amnesty Boozer because they were not the team that signed him, and to get rid of all of those bad contracts they wouldnt get any value. To be honest, the Detroit part lines up in my mind. However, CHI cant get Melo for dropping as little as they did. They would be giving up all of their picks this year as well

        0
  • #896855
    AvatarAvatar
    WinterSoldier
    Participant

     If the Bulls want Melo the trade starts with Boozer(Expiring contract) Butler, Smith and both 2014 first round picks plus likely future picks.

    0
  • #896738
    AvatarAvatar
    WinterSoldier
    Participant

     If the Bulls want Melo the trade starts with Boozer(Expiring contract) Butler, Smith and both 2014 first round picks plus likely future picks.

    0
    • #897087
      AvatarAvatar
      TheArtistPaysthePrice
      Participant

       I would would want Gibson instead of Boozer. NY should want as close to as much as they gave up to get Melo. 

      0
    • #896972
      AvatarAvatar
      TheArtistPaysthePrice
      Participant

       I would would want Gibson instead of Boozer. NY should want as close to as much as they gave up to get Melo. 

      0
  • #897111
    AvatarAvatar
    bcscards1
    Participant

     If he convinces NY he is, then NY doesn’t have the leverage to hold out for Gibson or even Butler.  The 2 problems I see is why the T-Wolves would ever do this and a technicality that the Bulls would be prohibited from giving up their pick #19 this year and their #1 next year.

     

    0
  • #896996
    AvatarAvatar
    bcscards1
    Participant

     If he convinces NY he is, then NY doesn’t have the leverage to hold out for Gibson or even Butler.  The 2 problems I see is why the T-Wolves would ever do this and a technicality that the Bulls would be prohibited from giving up their pick #19 this year and their #1 next year.

     

    0

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login