This topic contains 17 replies, has 8 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar gatorheels 14 years, 10 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • Posted on: Mon, 06/29/2009 - 4:01am #5883
    AvatarAvatar
    knicksfreak
    Participant

    The Lakers and Kings are 2 teams that are reportedly very interested in Nate Robinson. Kobe Bryant and Jerry Buss are supposedly enamored by him after his 33 point showing in LA. The Knicks and Kings were very close to a deal that woulve sent Robinson and Jeffries to Sacramento before the tade deadline. That deal is said to have re-emerged this offseason.

    It would be great if we could unload Jeffries’ contract with Nate and possibly get Donte Greene in return with some expiring contracts.

    0
  • Posted on: Mon, 06/29/2009 - 4:18am #172866
    AvatarAvatar
    Knicksboy34
    Participant

    If we get Greene…..I will be shocked

    0
  • Posted on: Mon, 06/29/2009 - 4:29am #172868
    AvatarAvatar
    JNixon
    Participant

    He would be a good fit for the Knicks.

    0
  • Posted on: Mon, 06/29/2009 - 4:36am #172869
    AvatarAvatar
    gatorheels
    Participant

    I could definitely see a trade between the Knicks & Kings going down. Especially if its a sign&trade type deal. Obviously the Kings want Nate but I think they would also be interested in Chandler (who seems to be on the trading block). The Knicks would probably be interested in Greene, Garcia, & even McCants.

    What about this trade:
    Kings get: Nate Robinson (sign & trade), Wilson Chandler
    Knicks get: Greene, Garcia, McCants(sign & trade)

    0
  • Posted on: Mon, 06/29/2009 - 4:44am #172875
    AvatarAvatar
    JNixon
    Participant

    The Knicks would be giving up too much.

    0
  • Posted on: Mon, 06/29/2009 - 4:48am #172877
    AvatarAvatar
    knicksfreak
    Participant

    Chandler isnt on the block. We could’ve had the 5th pick if we threw him in with Hughes. Alot of teams are inquiring about him but he is as close to untouchable as anybody on the roster. The only deal I can see him involved in is a possible trade for rubio.

    0
  • Posted on: Mon, 06/29/2009 - 4:50am #172878
    AvatarAvatar
    NYKnicksuperFan
    Participant

    the knicks would give Chandler up so easily, they didnt give him up for a lotto pick so a bunch of role players wouldnt suffice, but to the knigs? i think nate would seriously stunt Tyreke Evans growth

    0
  • Posted on: Mon, 06/29/2009 - 5:09am #172885
    AvatarAvatar
    gatorheels
    Participant

    Man yall act like Chandler is an allstar or something….I don’t think he is that much better than Garcia. Plus Greene is still young and has a ton of potential. I would take McCants over Robinson anyday…..of course I am biased though ha.

    0
  • Posted on: Mon, 06/29/2009 - 5:21am #172888
    AvatarAvatar
    Knicksboy34
    Participant

    Chandler is a classic Knicks player. He’s could be really good.

    0
  • Posted on: Mon, 06/29/2009 - 5:25am #172889
    AvatarAvatar
    birdman113

    if the Lakers got Robinson….. that would stink.

    0
  • Posted on: Mon, 06/29/2009 - 5:28am #172890
    AvatarAvatar
    Knicksboy34
    Participant

    stop please….

    0
  • Posted on: Mon, 06/29/2009 - 5:29am #172891
    AvatarAvatar
    The8thDeadlySin
    Participant

    In my opinion, Robinson isnt really a guy I want if im a rebuiling team. He will stunt the growth of young players. He is a good offensive player but takes lots of shots. Best place he could play would be the Knicks, Warriors, or Suns just because of the style of ball they play.

    0
  • Posted on: Mon, 06/29/2009 - 5:30am #172892
    AvatarAvatar
    JNixon
    Participant

    Wilson Chandler is alot better than Garcia. He also has plenty of potential and could develop into an all-star player, while Garcia is just a shooter.

    0
  • Posted on: Mon, 06/29/2009 - 5:31am #172893
    AvatarAvatar
    birdman113

    knicksboy34 is your podcast on itunes yet?

    0
  • Posted on: Mon, 06/29/2009 - 5:34am #172894
    AvatarAvatar
    Knicksboy34
    Participant

    no…net yet….Apparently they must have postponed it…

    0
  • Posted on: Mon, 06/29/2009 - 8:07am #172929
    AvatarAvatar
    auber
    Participant

    Don’t you Knicks fans dare say anyone is untouchable. We all heard that sad story with Channing Frye.

    0
  • Posted on: Mon, 06/29/2009 - 8:27am #172940
    AvatarAvatar
    Mattissick
    Participant

    I would be so happy if the Kings got Robinson. You can have Greene and especially have Garcia cuz he is terrible. The kings need some excitment again. Do you think they would have Martin at the 3, evans at 2 and Robinson at 1 then? Or would Robinson play 2 and Evans the 1?

    0
  • Posted on: Mon, 06/29/2009 - 8:40am #172947
    AvatarAvatar
    gatorheels
    Participant

    News Flash…Nate Robinson is not going to start over Kevin Martin. Nate wouldn’t even start over Tyreke. Nate would be a good 6th man for the Kings, he wouldn’t start. Garcia isn’t terrible either. It would be stupid to give up on Greene so quick also.

    0
  • Author
    Posts

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login