share

Mock draft 2.0

grizz_fan7
Registered User
Joined: 12/03/2008
Posts: 129
Points: 62
Offline

grizz_fan7
Registered User
Joined: 12/03/2008
Posts: 129
Points: 62
Offline
dont pay attention to the

dont pay attention to the 2nd rd

Knicksboy34
Knicksboy34's picture
Registered User
Joined: 06/07/2009
Posts: 2876
Points: -98
Offline
good mock, Check out Mock

good mock, Check out Mock Draft 5.0

grizz_fan7
Registered User
Joined: 12/03/2008
Posts: 129
Points: 62
Offline
nice mock knicksboy but

nice mock knicksboy but johnson doesn't go to toronto they get derozan or clark

gedrosolan
Registered User
Joined: 06/13/2008
Posts: 68
Points: 14
Offline
nice job

although i don't really see the grizzlies wanting harden since they already have mayo. but as a kings fan, i would do that trade.

grizz_fan7
Registered User
Joined: 12/03/2008
Posts: 129
Points: 62
Offline
Harden would be the perfect

Harden would be the perfect 6th man for the grizz

Knicksboy34
Knicksboy34's picture
Registered User
Joined: 06/07/2009
Posts: 2876
Points: -98
Offline
Grizz fan answer me this Why

Grizz fan answer me this

Why would Sacramento give up a 2010 pick, Darrel Arthur and James Harden for Rubio and a 2010 pick?

I mean, If I was Sacramento, I would do anything but a pick swap (2 for 4) because Rubio Does Not Wanna Play In Memphis...

grizz_fan7
Registered User
Joined: 12/03/2008
Posts: 129
Points: 62
Offline
Darrell Arthur is on the

Darrell Arthur is on the grizzlies genius
the trade is

Memphis sends Arthur, + Rubio
Sacramento sends Harden + 2010 1st rd pick (top 3 protected)

Knicksboy34
Knicksboy34's picture
Registered User
Joined: 06/07/2009
Posts: 2876
Points: -98
Offline
my bad... but still, 2010 is

my bad...

but still, 2010 is looking like a all-time draft, why should I give up a 2010 pick for Rubio when I could add a Holiday, Curry, Jennings or even a Flynn and probably get the same numbers?

I dont think a Memphis-Sacramento deal will happen.

grizz_fan7
Registered User
Joined: 12/03/2008
Posts: 129
Points: 62
Offline
the grizz might have to

the grizz might have to throw in darko's expiring for a bad contract from sacramento

it might work because look at it this way
if arthur was in this draft where would he go?probably top 10
if rubio was in next years draft where would he go? probably top 6

so in my eyes its a bit in memphis's favour but if you do darko for bad contract it evens out very well

Knicksboy34
Knicksboy34's picture
Registered User
Joined: 06/07/2009
Posts: 2876
Points: -98
Offline
No way. If I'm Sacramento,

No way. If I'm Sacramento, why would I give up the 2010 pick?

were gonna be bad, again in 2010. keep it. Take Holiday (4th), Daye (23rd) and Claver (31st)

Darko? I dont want him. And, Arthur would not go top 10 in this draft...too many good PG and not alot of teams need a 3/4

grizz_fan7
Registered User
Joined: 12/03/2008
Posts: 129
Points: 62
Offline
Darko is as good as gold now

Darko is as good as gold now he has a 7million dollar expiring contract going into a year being said to be the best FA class ever, sacramento can shed some bad contracts while getting darko a huge trading asset

Knicksboy34
Knicksboy34's picture
Registered User
Joined: 06/07/2009
Posts: 2876
Points: -98
Offline
uhhh. no not for a 2010 pick

uhhh. no not for a 2010 pick and a shot at John Wall, Cousins, Favors, Henry and Aldrich....doesnt make sense

grizz_fan7
Registered User
Joined: 12/03/2008
Posts: 129
Points: 62
Offline
it is top 3 protected which

it is top 3 protected which means if the ping pong balls bounce in sacramentos favour they keep the pick until next year

Knicksboy34
Knicksboy34's picture
Registered User
Joined: 06/07/2009
Posts: 2876
Points: -98
Offline
yea but there are many good

yea but there are many good players in 2010 draft...not just 3.

I think that if you took out the 2010 pick, that trade becomes more realistic.

grizz_fan7
Registered User
Joined: 12/03/2008
Posts: 129
Points: 62
Offline
yeah but then the grizz are

yeah but then the grizz are trading down for nothing

Knicksboy34
Knicksboy34's picture
Registered User
Joined: 06/07/2009
Posts: 2876
Points: -98
Offline
Well this deal would sound

Well this deal would sound more realistic

Memphis-Rubio, Darko and Arthur
Sacramento- Hill, Udrih and Greene

grizz_fan7
Registered User
Joined: 12/03/2008
Posts: 129
Points: 62
Offline
that trade is horrible for

that trade is horrible for the grizz

Knicksboy34
Knicksboy34's picture
Registered User
Joined: 06/07/2009
Posts: 2876
Points: -98
Offline
Well, I think the Rubio hype

Well, I think the Rubio hype is dying. I wouldnt give up alot for him. He will have a huge learning curve from Euro to NBA and Sacramento can take a PG at 4.

If Sacramento doesnt want Rubio and fall in love with another PG, Memphis might as well not take Rubio,

Yankeep12
Yankeep12's picture
Registered User
Joined: 06/10/2009
Posts: 74
Points: 16
Offline
stupid trade

sacramento and memphis have already had discussions. sacramento won't be getting the number 2 pick without giving up jason thompson, and that is something that they aren't going to do.

RSS: Syndicate content