share

Lakers vs. Celtics; Who's got the better Future?

MCatTheLegend
Registered User
Joined: 02/25/2013
Posts: 3
Points: 5
Offline
Lakers vs. Celtics; Who's got the better Future?

The NBA's two most storied franchises appear to both have a rough patch ahead of them. My question is, who has a brighter future ahead of them? The Celtics, with their recent trades to acquire youth, or the Lakers projected cap space next summer.


esperanzafleet69
esperanzafleet69's picture
Registered User
Joined: 06/19/2009
Posts: 1675
Points: 991
Offline
that cap space is basically

that cap space is basically useless next year, outside of the entire heat roster (and players currently on the lakers), theres not much out there. i really dont think carmelo or paul pierce will use their ETOs next year at all, so really the lakers would be looking at Dirk, Zbo, possibly rudy gay, or some other restricted FA's like john wall, greg monroe, and more.

boston is ready to sink for wiggins or parker. and the only real players they're paying are jeff green and rondo.

BrentSuriaga01
BrentSuriaga01's picture
Registered User
Joined: 01/24/2012
Posts: 276
Points: 339
Offline
I think

The media got this all wrong again. Kobe would take pay cut but not the one being mentioned like 1.45 million dollars. I know he's old but I don't think it's very smart to take a pay cut from 30 million to 1.45 . Somewhere between 10-15 is my prediction.

MCatTheLegend
Registered User
Joined: 02/25/2013
Posts: 3
Points: 5
Offline
What about Pau?

Do you think Pau is going to be on the trading block again all season, or are they going to ride out this season with this rag-tag crew of veterans on one year contracts. I know it early to call, but on paper is this team even playoff contenders out west? I think Dallas Utah are going to be a little worse than last year but I see teams like Portland Houston and Golden State being better. On top of all that, Kobe is coming off his first major injury, and recently said he won't be taking a pay cut in the future.

Sewok15
Sewok15's picture
Registered User
Joined: 06/19/2011
Posts: 1898
Points: 3429
Offline
I would have to say Boston

I would have to say Boston considering the still have a young star on their roster. Rondo is a guy you can build around for the future. Add that to the fact that they hired one of the brightest young coaches around and I would say they are in better shape than the Lakers with an aging roster and Mike D'Antoni coaching.

This could change quickly if the Lakers pick up a prime time player in free agency next summer but to me Boston just has a lot more young talent. Bradley, Green, Sullinger, and Olynyk would all be players the Lakers would love to have. The Lakers don't have one player under 30 that really has any value at all around the league.

Bmore_DC
Bmore_DC's picture
Registered User
Joined: 05/19/2010
Posts: 1010
Points: 1197
Offline
Have you seen what the

Have you seen what the Celtics have done in the last month?

Answer: Celtics

Forte IV
Forte IV's picture
Registered User
Joined: 12/06/2008
Posts: 764
Points: 2342
Offline
Celtics in my opinion. Trust

Celtics in my opinion. Trust me when i say this. Those picks they got will be good. The Nets literally have two years in my opinion to win. After that, they'll just have D-Will who will probably bounce because when everyone else retires, they'll have nothing to trade to help D-Will out.

Sewok15
Sewok15's picture
Registered User
Joined: 06/19/2011
Posts: 1898
Points: 3429
Offline
Brook Lopez and D Will should

Brook Lopez and D Will should be enough to keep the Nets a float for the next 4 years. I would imagine they will only miss the playoffs one time at the most in that time span.

AmiableBaller34
AmiableBaller34's picture
Registered User
Joined: 04/16/2013
Posts: 273
Points: 688
Offline
Exactly, the Nets just showed

Exactly, the Nets just showed exactly how much they're willing to spend to put a team together, and in a short amount of time. I don't think Brooklyn will ever be a bottom feeder as long as Prokorhov is willing to dish out that much cash.

Mopgrass
Registered User
Joined: 04/29/2013
Posts: 441
Points: 377
Offline
As a Laker fan, I'd say we're

As a Laker fan, I'd say we're just screwed.

Who wants to play with Kobe?

He couldn't play off the ball to save his soul. His big showing to teammates this year was to become the PG mid-year, taking Nash's job away. Then, he gets in Dwight Howard's face and tells him to sit and watch and learn how to be a champion. Other players hear this stuff. Who wants to deal with that?

I'd be shocked if we got an excellent pair of FA's to come to L.A. next year. I'd love to have John Wall and whoever else. But the 2nd problem is the Lakers have zero bench.

Nash is on the books and Kobe, Gasol, and Jordan Hill probably resign. Probably. After that, there is nothing. No outside shooting, young players, or a base of bench players to build around. They'd have to buy there bench and they probably wouldn't afford it after they buy their big fish free agents.

I'd rather amnesty (with Kobe's okay), trade, tank, and start over. But no. Instead the Lakers will flirt with 500 all year if they're lucky and gain nothing from it.

Sewok15
Sewok15's picture
Registered User
Joined: 06/19/2011
Posts: 1898
Points: 3429
Offline
John Wall will be a

John Wall will be a restricted free agent with less than a 1% chance that the Wiz wouldn't match a max offer. They also used their amnesty on Metta World Peace as I just attempted to tell you.

Ang Puti Lalaki
Ang Puti Lalaki's picture
Registered User
Joined: 06/13/2008
Posts: 1122
Points: 1169
Offline
Boston

Celtics might be a mess for a couple of years
But the lakers will have kobe for multiple years. So Boston comes out on top!

laarethekings
Registered User
Joined: 07/01/2009
Posts: 328
Points: 191
Offline
I think it comes down to this

I think it comes down to this next season. If the Lakers can come out of this draft with 2 first round draft picks they have a shot. Again I think the Lakers should use some of that cap space to get draft rights a la Cavs with the Davis trade that landed them Irving.

I keep saying this it's the 2015 summer the Lakers should be looking at. Not 2014.

RSS: Syndicate content