share

Kings @ 7 - Kemba / Jimmer

r377
r377's picture
Registered User
Joined: 12/28/2010
Posts: 1610
Points: 4562
Offline
Kings @ 7 - Kemba / Jimmer

up until recently 80-90% of ppl had kemba going to the kings, now it seems like Jimmer is gaining in popularity ?

Thoughts ? Work out news ?


JimmeredYaWabafet
Registered User
Joined: 01/22/2010
Posts: 653
Points: -287
Offline
ive been twittering the

ive been twittering the Maloof brothers to draft Bismack :D

SmooveKRYPT
SmooveKRYPT's picture
Registered User
Joined: 02/13/2009
Posts: 607
Points: 1043
Offline
I still have Kemba as the guy

I still have Kemba as the guy there.

SmooveKRYPT
SmooveKRYPT's picture
Registered User
Joined: 02/13/2009
Posts: 607
Points: 1043
Offline
I still have Kemba as the guy

I still have Kemba as the guy there, but the buzz is that Jimmer amazed them with his workout.

JNixon
JNixon's picture
Registered User
Joined: 04/14/2009
Posts: 12959
Points: 11022
Offline
They would be well-advised to

They would be well-advised to take Jimmer Fredette over Kemba Walker. Jimmer, Tyreke Evans and Marcus Thornton in the backcourt together is a very young and high-octane offense. And I definitely Jimmer is a better fit with those guys than Kemba Walker is.

scliddiard
Registered User
Joined: 04/29/2011
Posts: 267
Points: 307
Offline
I think Jimmer has been

I think Jimmer has been undervalued up til now and still many don't believe, he has more nba ready skills than Knight or Walker IMO, he's a better shooter, better handles, better after contact, better at getting to the line, better passer.

Tongue-Out-Like-23
Tongue-Out-Like-23's picture
Registered User
Joined: 03/16/2010
Posts: 8302
Points: 11872
Offline
scliddiard I believe most of

scliddiard

I believe most of what you're saying is opinion instead of fact. He's does not have better handles, I wouldn't say he's all that better after contact, he's not better at getting to the line, and he is most definitely not a better passer.

But then again, this is my opinion as well and I'm a Kemba fan. So I'm biased.

I believe Jimmer can come in and have a good impact right away while Kemba would need a while to get into rhythm.

You know what they say, the easiest skill that translates to the NBA is shooting, and Jimmer does that as well as anyone.

JNixon
JNixon's picture
Registered User
Joined: 04/14/2009
Posts: 12959
Points: 11022
Offline
Jimmer Fredette is definitely

Jimmer Fredette is definitely a better playmaker and better dealing with contact than Kemba Walker. Walker isn't efficient enough and he's not a real PG. Fredette has shown that he's a willing passer when he has talented teammates with him, and he's a much more efficient player in the same scenario. Kemba Walker is just like a Jonny Flynn-type. He'll score for a team, but he's not going to be a big threat from 3, and he's not going to be an efficient scorer or a true PG.

Tongue-Out-Like-23
Tongue-Out-Like-23's picture
Registered User
Joined: 03/16/2010
Posts: 8302
Points: 11872
Offline
Now, Jimmer may be better

Now, Jimmer may be better dealing with contact simply because of his body but Kemba has that athleticism to him that can make him difficult to guard when he gets in the paint. I'm still not buying that Fredette is a better playmaker than Kemba.

JNixon
JNixon's picture
Registered User
Joined: 04/14/2009
Posts: 12959
Points: 11022
Offline
Kemba Walker isn't really

Kemba Walker isn't really that much of a PG, never really has been either. Fredette showed in his Soph and Jr. seasons that he can effectively play PG.

BBall4life88
BBall4life88's picture
Registered User
Joined: 05/29/2011
Posts: 245
Points: 363
Offline
I have Kemba going to the

I have Kemba going to the Raptors at 5 and Jimmer going to Utah at 12

lakano
lakano's picture
Registered User
Joined: 03/30/2009
Posts: 169
Points: 188
Offline
Way to disregard Kemba's

Way to disregard Kemba's first 2 seasons nobody thought of him as an undersized shooting guard then.

JNixon
JNixon's picture
Registered User
Joined: 04/14/2009
Posts: 12959
Points: 11022
Offline
He certainly wasn't a pure PG

He certainly wasn't a pure PG then either. Notice how when he was trying to be a PG, they were an NIT team. But when he wasn't they made it to the Elite 8 and won a title? He was never the teams PG when UConn was good. Napier and A.J. Price were.

Memphis Madness
Registered User
Joined: 03/30/2011
Posts: 3298
Points: -917
Offline
Jimmer would give them a

Jimmer would give them a great 3 guard rotation. They could even go small with a 3 guard lineup.
Cousins is a beast down low with Dalembert as a good defensive center if he resigns. Garcia could start
at small forward as a utility/glue guy.

I would really like that team a lot. Plenty of offensive firepower to go along with inside scoring and rebounding.
I could see them winning around 40 games with an outside shot at the playoffs.

jazz270
Registered User
Joined: 04/30/2011
Posts: 48
Points: 53
Offline
JNixon-Iggy9

Perfect comparison of the two players, Sir. Spot on.

Sorry we got off on a wrong foot when I first started posting here. Your daily updates are wonderful, insightful, and extremely accurate. I'm afraid I only have time to study about the first twenty players in each draft in depth, so I admire the work you must put in to study the whole draft. My buddies think I'm crazy about the draft? Wow.

Jimmer has been undervalued, although how that could happen when he swept all the honors for college player of the year is astounding. Something to consider is that something like 60% of the Naismith Winners have become all-stars in the NBA, a much better percentage than the top 5 draft picks.

I like all of them, Knight, Jimmer and Kemba, though they're all a little different players and how they fit in an offense should be considered carefully before drafting one of them. I have Knight slightly ahead of Jimmer and Kemba just a hair behind Jimmer, but they're all good. They all have things they need to improve to become good players in the NBA, but they all have enough talent and drive to get there. I firmly believe that.

One thing that probably should be mentioned is that they all are extremely driven players, good kids almost to a fault, and would be welcome in any team's locker room. They're great kids, though each of them are killers on the court.

Tough decisions are ahead.

bloodshy
bloodshy's picture
Registered User
Joined: 06/09/2011
Posts: 570
Points: 2382
Offline
I hope the Kings take Kemba.

I'd really like Jimmer to be around @ 12 for the Jazz.

KingsNation707
Registered User
Joined: 06/10/2011
Posts: 1
Points: 4
Offline
Fredette impressed the Kings

Fredette impressed the Kings so much, that at the workout the Maloofs went up to talk to him right after the work out. They didnt even say a word to the other prospects there. Jimmer was so impressive he had the Maloofs and other Kings front office members laughing with how rediculous his shooting ability is.

Jimmer is a way better fit than Kemba(who would give us basically a smaller Tyreke type player). This team is in desperate need of 3 point shooters and players that can help now. Jimmer can do both. We were one of the worst 3 point shooting teams last year, and we need a spot up shooter and a guy who can shoot off the dribble. A rotation of Tyreke and Thornton starting with Jimmer and Beno off the bench would give us a lot of Guards who can effect the game in many ways.

Don't get me wrong though, I think Kemba Walker will be by far one of the better players in this draft, but adding him to the Kings won't fix any problems we have right now.

omphalos
omphalos's picture
Registered User
Joined: 06/19/2010
Posts: 3188
Points: 4524
Offline
I admit, I was pretty down on

I admit, I was pretty down on Jimmer, but he seems to be working very hard, and he suits their win-now mentality as an almost fully-formed prospect. One thing that makes Jimmer the better candidate is shooting; Tyreke is always drawing double-teams on drives, and same for Cousins; having that dead-eye shooter at the PG spot to kick out to ala Steve Kerr would be very useful to the Kings. It all comes down to defensive ability though; I've seen Kemba do some great things when he's locked in defensively, but if Jimmer can give more effort and take a back seat to Reke and Cousins, then that could work too. Lots of ifs though... should be interesting to see where they go.

PulseGlazer
Registered User
Joined: 06/12/2011
Posts: 1281
Points: 1906
Offline
I'm not a big Jimmer fan, but

I'm not a big Jimmer fan, but him over Kemba makes a lot more sense. It's not just about players (as Raymond Felton and Johnny Flynn most recently proved), but about fits with the system. Evans and Cousins demand a lot of extra attention on offense, but also the ball in their hands. Jimmer doesn't need much space to get up a three and, moreover, is really excellent at finding and creating free space. He opens things up for the other two, and they open things up for him. Kemba, like those two, needs the ball in his hands, as does Thornton. With only one ball, that's more likely to be a problem than Jimmer who really potentially gives them something similar to their early 00s club.

JoeWolf1
JoeWolf1's picture
Registered User
Joined: 05/28/2009
Posts: 8098
Points: 15724
Offline
Apparently, Jimmer has just

Apparently, Jimmer has just been killing it in all of his workouts. This isn't just Sacremento's, his stock is up accross the board. I haven't read about Kemba's workout with the Kings yesterday, but Jimmer's stock is up accross the board. It wouldn't surprise me at all if Jimmer went @7, but I'm curious to read about Kemba's workout yesterday.

Edit: after posting, I found this article about the workout yesterday. This writer wasn't too impressed with Kemba, I wonder if this sentiment is shared by the King's front office? Jimmer could very well be near a lock at #7 if it is.

http://www.sactownroyalty.com/2011/6/13/2222301/june-13th-kings-pre-draf...

GottaBeTheShoes
Registered User
Joined: 06/04/2011
Posts: 839
Points: 2489
Offline
Kemba is way better at taking

Kemba is way better at taking contact... He had so many and 1's in college. He was tremendous at taking it to the rim and better than jimmer at that.. The only think jimmer has on him is shooting... Handles - kemba is better. Jimmer averaged more turnovers than kemba.. Jimmer looked like he jogged everywhere and played simple competition while kemba played in arguably the toughest conference. Kemba would've destroyed in the Mountain West.. I'm not dissing on jimmer while i think jimmer is good I would take Kemba over him any day.. Shooting can be improved athleticism is more of natural born talent. Kemba will go 5,7, or 9. Jimmer will go 7 or 12 and I do think he would be a better fit for the kings

uconn1
Registered User
Joined: 05/09/2011
Posts: 5
Points: 4
Offline
Kemba

I Agree that Kemba is better. Kemba's handle is better, he is quicker, and able to slide thru spaces that seem too tight - created by defenses. Kemba is amazing at finishing at the rim, is just as good if not better than Jimmer in the mid range game, and is a terrific leader. Just compare the competition Kemba faced in the Big East vs Jimmer. Plus Kemba plays defense. These results speak for themselves:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFnQXT68zL4

uconn1
Registered User
Joined: 05/09/2011
Posts: 5
Points: 4
Offline
Kemba

I Agree that Kemba is better. Kemba's handle is better, he is quicker, and able to slide thru spaces that seem too tight - created by defenses. Kemba is amazing at finishing at the rim, is just as good if not better than Jimmer in the mid range game, and is a terrific leader. Just compare the competition Kemba faced in the Big East vs Jimmer. Plus Kemba plays defense. These results speak for themselves:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFnQXT68zL4

jazz270
Registered User
Joined: 04/30/2011
Posts: 48
Points: 53
Offline
MWC

OK, I'm tired of the Mountain West bashing.

Last year it was better than the Pac10, better than the Big East at the top of the conference.

I know that UConn won the title, but that was because they got hot. I've never seen two worse teams in the finals, ever. Not bashing UConn either. Walker is a great player. Jimmer is better.

There are a lot of ifs in basketball. If Davies hadn't left the Cougars right when it counted, it would have been BYU playing for the National Championship. BYU was a much better team with Davies there, and they almost made it to the Final Four without him.

Most years the Big East is a much better conference. Last year the MWC was better until Davies got canned. If you didn't follow the Cougars, you don't know how good Davies was, and he was a legit inside player who could play on any team in America. Just watch him this next year and see.

It looks like the Big East fans are defending Kemba, they don't have to. He's a great player, but Jimmer is simply a better player. No shame for Kemba. If Jimmer isn't there, I hope the Jazz draft him.

And I'm not a BYU fan at all. In fact, I usually despise the Cougars in basketball, but give them their props, and give the Jimmer his. He deserves it.

cward23
Registered User
Joined: 04/16/2011
Posts: 617
Points: 170
Offline
Not sure why some people

Not sure why some people don't think Kemba is a PG when he was a very good one before having to pick up the scoring load. The team's he was on before then were different therefore you can't really compare him as a pg and him as a scoring pg when talking about team success(not to mention the teams he was playing against had different players his first two seasons).

Another thing is none of us knows how good or bad a player is gonna be so it's pretty dumb to make a definative statement like " this player will be able to do this or won't be able to do this". We don't know what they will be able to do, we can guess and say we think this or that but thats as much as we can do as far as predictions.

I think in the right system either payer can be better than the other player. (Jimmer in the su's or icks system would be a perfect fit IMO)

JNixon
JNixon's picture
Registered User
Joined: 04/14/2009
Posts: 12959
Points: 11022
Offline
"Not sure why some people

"Not sure why some people don't think Kemba is a PG when he was a very good one before having to pick up the scoring load. The team's he was on before then were different therefore you can't really compare him as a pg and him as a scoring pg when talking about team success(not to mention the teams he was playing against had different players his first two seasons)."

Because he wasn't a very good PG. He was only OK as a PG whenever he got minutes there, but he was turnover prone and didn't take control of the team from the position. He has never been a PG for a good team before. UConn was a .500 team before the Big East tourny, wanna know why? Because Shabazz Napier stepped up after the Big East slate. Kemba Walker didn't step up as a PG or get efficient in conference play. UConn got that title because Napier stepped up and Jeremy Lamb grew up. UConn collapsed when he was a Soph. when he was a PG. He certainly didn't improve his PG skills from that season to last year either. I think UConn being shaky during last season's conference slate and UConn collapsing during the 09-10 season have a good bit to do with Kemba Walker not being a real PG. I don't see how it couldn't. UConn certainly had a good enough core during his Soph. season to be better than a NIT team don't you think? They returned alot of guys from the core of that Elite 8 squad, yet they didn't even make the tournament. Walker has shown he's not a very good PG throughout college.

cward23
Registered User
Joined: 04/16/2011
Posts: 617
Points: 170
Offline
And thats a opinion not a

And thats a opinion not a fact. Can't make a definitive statement like that when a guy hasn't played a minute in the NBA. If it was definitive teams would not be looking to draft him so high because he would just be a undersized SG. Obviously thats not the case because teams that hae done researh on him for years feel he has the ability/potential to play PG and be a very good one at that.

There have been many guys before Waler who were worst as aPG in college but got better at it in the NBA( and some who were better in college but worst in the NBA) which is why i say you can't make a definative statement as to what he will or wont be, just how you feel in you're opinion what he will turn out to be

cward23
Registered User
Joined: 04/16/2011
Posts: 617
Points: 170
Offline
Jeff Teague, Darren Collinson

Jeff Teague, Darren Collinson both played pretty well as PG's this season

Teauge averaged about the same amount of Turnovers as Ast in college

Collinson averaged less ast and about the same amount of turnovers

JNixon
JNixon's picture
Registered User
Joined: 04/14/2009
Posts: 12959
Points: 11022
Offline
"And thats a opinion not a

"And thats a opinion not a fact. Can't make a definitive statement like that when a guy hasn't played a minute in the NBA. If it was definitive teams would not be looking to draft him so high because he would just be a undersized SG. Obviously thats not the case because teams that hae done researh on him for years feel he has the ability/potential to play PG and be a very good one at that.

There have been many guys before Waler who were worst as aPG in college but got better at it in the NBA( and some who were better in college but worst in the NBA) which is why i say you can't make a definative statement as to what he will or wont be, just how you feel in you're opinion what he will turn out to be"

How is the fact that they were an NIT team when Walker was the PG, and they made it to the Elite 8 and won a title with him as an off guard an opinion? He's basically what Jonny Flynn was before the hip injury last year. A scorer as a combo guard who will get you 4 apg and shot a low percentage from the field. Teams do research on all the guys that get selected, but that doesn't mean they can't have their role changed upon being on an NBA roster. The changes of him being a great pure PG are far less likely given that he NEVER proved to be that in college after 3 years of playing.

JNixon
JNixon's picture
Registered User
Joined: 04/14/2009
Posts: 12959
Points: 11022
Offline
"Jeff Teague, Darren

"Jeff Teague, Darren Collinson both played pretty well as PG's this season

Teauge averaged about the same amount of Turnovers as Ast in college

Collinson averaged less ast and about the same amount of turnovers"

Collison was a PG in college and a winner playing the position. Jeff Teague is still MUCH more of a scorer than a playmaker, and he didn't have a great season. He had a good series against the Bulls. There is a difference.

cward23
Registered User
Joined: 04/16/2011
Posts: 617
Points: 170
Offline
my point being you nor anyone

my point being you nor anyone else can make a definitive statement about how good or bad Walker will be because we havn't seen him play in the NBA. Thats not even debateable since no one can see into the future. The most any of us can do is have a personal opinion of how good or bad a player will be

cward23
Registered User
Joined: 04/16/2011
Posts: 617
Points: 170
Offline
Also these days being a

Also these days being a scoring guard is a good thing. The MVP is a scoring guard and the Guy behind him who was second team all NBA was a scoring guard. That seems to be the thing to be in the NBa these days

JNixon
JNixon's picture
Registered User
Joined: 04/14/2009
Posts: 12959
Points: 11022
Offline
"my point being you nor

"my point being you nor anyone else can make a definitive statement about how good or bad Walker will be because we havn't seen him play in the NBA. Thats not even debateable since no one can see into the future. The most any of us can do is have a personal opinion of how good or bad a player will be"

It's obviously not carved in stone, but you can't write off the lack of results that he's shown when he's played PG. He's shown that he's not a true PG.

JNixon
JNixon's picture
Registered User
Joined: 04/14/2009
Posts: 12959
Points: 11022
Offline
"Also these days being a

"Also these days being a scoring guard is a good thing. The MVP is a scoring guard and the Guy behind him who was second team all NBA was a scoring guard. That seems to be the thing to be in the NBa these days"

Derrick Rose is a pure PG, and has proven that at the highest levels of basketball. He's shown that he's unselfish and he really only scores as much as he does because he lacks shot creators beside him. Scoring guards are en vogue, but that doesn't mean Kemba Walker is a pure PG, or a Derrick Rose-type player.

cward23
Registered User
Joined: 04/16/2011
Posts: 617
Points: 170
Offline
You just made my point with

You just made my point with the comment

"The changes of him being a great pure PG are far less likely given that he NEVER proved to be that in college after 3 years of playing"

Definitive means you already know and have facts to prove as much. there are no facts to prove it. What you do in college is not a fact of what you will do in the NBA. What you do at one level can be a indication of what you will do at the next level but it is not a fact.

cward23
Registered User
Joined: 04/16/2011
Posts: 617
Points: 170
Offline
this is getting off

this is getting off point...Point being you nor anyone else can make a definitive statement about what someone will bein the future. Just a OPINION. and you're opinion has been well stated and we all respect it but its not fact just like aother person who says he will be a great PG. Both are OPINIONS and everyone is more than entitiled to that

JNixon
JNixon's picture
Registered User
Joined: 04/14/2009
Posts: 12959
Points: 11022
Offline
"Definitive means you already

"Definitive means you already know and have facts to prove as much. there are no facts to prove it. What you do in college is not a fact of what you will do in the NBA. What you do at one level can be a indication of what you will do at the next level but it is not a fact."

Read the first sentence of that same post. I clearly said it's not definitive.

And how does it not indicate? If you can't score effiiciently against college conference teams, how will you magically become efficient? Especially as a small guard with shaky decision making and shot selection. If you can't run a team with borderline prospects who formed the core of an Elite 8 squad the season before, how will you run a good NBA team?

GottaBeTheShoes
Registered User
Joined: 06/04/2011
Posts: 839
Points: 2489
Offline
Keep going... Kemba loves to

Kemba loves to prove doubters like you Jnixon... Kemba carried the huskies to a championship its that freaking simple... Lamb only average like what 13 points? Kemba averaged like 26 in the tournament showed good passing ability. His decision making is not shaky. He knows when to shoot shots and when not too... Napier was his backup and came in so Kemba could play 2 for a bit but Kemba would still play like a point at the 2... What do you mean he didn't score efficiently? By saying that your basically dissing on any player in the Nba who has to consistently carry his team a la Rose or Kobe.

JNixon
JNixon's picture
Registered User
Joined: 04/14/2009
Posts: 12959
Points: 11022
Offline
"Kemba averaged like 26 in

"Kemba averaged like 26 in the tournament showed good passing ability. His decision making is not shaky. He knows when to shoot shots and when not too... Napier was his backup and came in so Kemba could play 2 for a bit but Kemba would still play like a point at the 2"

He scored 26 ppg, but all that shows is he's a scorer like I've been saying. If he decision making wasn't shaky why would be play only limited time at PG when he's clearly a PG in terms of his physical tools? You're telling me Shabazz Napier is playing extended time over Kemba Walker who is supposed to be a top PG prospect, and Walker is a PG and not a shaky decision maker? Walker's inefficiency speaks to his decision making skills, and does not speak to him knowing to consistently take good shots.

cward23
Registered User
Joined: 04/16/2011
Posts: 617
Points: 170
Offline
Thats what i like about the

Thats what i like about the NBA. It can prove any things especiall how good or bad of a PG you are. Kemba had to score in order for his team to win but he won't have to score as much in the NBA and will have better players around him to pass to. There is one fact though, NBA teams think's he can play PG and play i very well or else he would't be projected to go so high. It remains to be seen if he can or can't but the FACT is teams think he can and in truth thats all that really matters untill he proves what he can do

JNixon
JNixon's picture
Registered User
Joined: 04/14/2009
Posts: 12959
Points: 11022
Offline
"What do you mean he didn't

"What do you mean he didn't score efficiently? By saying that your basically dissing on any player in the Nba who has to consistently carry his team a la Rose or Kobe."

No. That's not even comparable. Kobe's worst season from the field since his 2nd season is 43% carrying a shaky Laker team in 04-05 AGAINST NBA COMPETITION. Every other year his efficiency has been very good, particularly for how many shots he puts up. And 44% from Derrick Rose this year is the worst he's shot, which also is good for the load he shouldered. Kemba Walker isn't efficient against college players. There is a BIG difference.

JNixon
JNixon's picture
Registered User
Joined: 04/14/2009
Posts: 12959
Points: 11022
Offline
"There is one fact though,

"There is one fact though, NBA teams think's he can play PG and play i very well or else he would't be projected to go so high. It remains to be seen if he can or can't but the FACT is teams think he can and in truth thats all that really matters untill he proves what he can do"

Those same teams are lottery teams.....

cward23
Registered User
Joined: 04/16/2011
Posts: 617
Points: 170
Offline
Even non lotto teams think he

Even non lotto teams think he can play PG. And i would take those lotto teams opinion over us regular fans ay day of the week. We are just fans, they do this for a livig. Yes they are wrong sometimes but they know more than we do and spend way more time than we do watching these players. They see them in workout plus game. i'm not nieve enough to think i know more than them or nieve enough to think anyone on here knows more ( for the record none of us do)

cward23
Registered User
Joined: 04/16/2011
Posts: 617
Points: 170
Offline
Also every title team has

Also every title team has been a lotto team before so im not understanding you're point there

GottaBeTheShoes
Registered User
Joined: 06/04/2011
Posts: 839
Points: 2489
Offline
He had extended time because

He had extended time because he showed the ability to play the point... ONLY because he was playing well and connecticut need all the help they could get for Kemba. Its like eric bledsoe took time from John Wall that shouldn't take anything from John Wall... Decision making? he averaged 4.5 assists overall. Turnovers he averaged 1.2 less than Jimmer. That sounds like jimmer is a bad decision maker. Jimmer had a 1.2 A/T ratio while Kemba had a 2 A/T. One guy didn't make it past the sweet 16 the other won it all. Jimmer vs Woffard? 7 assists 4 turnovers 10 of 25 shooting.. Kemba vs Bucknell? 12 assists 2 turnovers and 5 of 11 shooting.. Kemba clearly better decision maker. Kemba had 10 7+ assist games and only 1 five turnover game. Jimmer? 5 7+ assist games and Jimmer had 8 five turnover games. Both of those including tournament.

GottaBeTheShoes
Registered User
Joined: 06/04/2011
Posts: 839
Points: 2489
Offline
Stats from top point guards in the league.

Derrick rose had 4.7 assists in college Kemba had 4.5 and 5.1 his soph. Chris Paul only shot 45 percent in college. Deron Williams shot 40% 41% and 43% in college look at him now... Russell Westbrook in his soph year only averaged 12 ppg and 4.3 assists and then left for the NBA.Steve Nash in college shot under 43% in his freshman sophomore and Senior year(junior year shot 44%) Kemba isn't the only one to shoot a bit subpar in college.. All of those the top 5 point guards in the league. So now what do you have to say?

JNixon
JNixon's picture
Registered User
Joined: 04/14/2009
Posts: 12959
Points: 11022
Offline
"Also every title team has

"Also every title team has been a lotto team before so im not understanding you're point there"

My point is Walker isn't going to be a title PG, and all the teams interested in drafting him have been in the lottery for at least 3 years in a row now except Utah, so they aren't very good. And if he slips to Utah he wouldn't start over Devin Harris if he went there, or make them better when they ease him into the role.

"He had extended time because he showed the ability to play the point... ONLY because he was playing well and connecticut need all the help they could get for Kemba. Its like eric bledsoe took time from John Wall that shouldn't take anything from John Wall... Decision making? he averaged 4.5 assists overall. Turnovers he averaged 1.2 less than Jimmer. That sounds like jimmer is a bad decision maker. Jimmer had a 1.2 A/T ratio while Kemba had a 2 A/T. One guy didn't make it past the sweet 16 the other won it all. Jimmer vs Woffard? 7 assists 4 turnovers 10 of 25 shooting.. Kemba vs Bucknell? 12 assists 2 turnovers and 5 of 11 shooting.. Kemba clearly better decision maker. Kemba had 10 7+ assist games and only 1 five turnover game. Jimmer? 5 7+ assist games and Jimmer had 8 five turnover games. Both of those including tournament."

He didn't play more time than Napier or play real extended time as a PG in any of the UConn games I watched this past season.

Eric Bledsoe showed the same iffy decision-making for the Clippers that he showed at Kentucky, so that's an indictment on him as opposed to him playing with John Wall. And Bledsoe played extremely limited time with John Wall. Walker has been giving many more chances to play PG than Bledsoe was in his lone year in Lexington.

Jimmer Fredette was the only good player during BYU's run to the tournament and had to shoulder more of a offensive load than any other player that was participating in the NCAA tournament. Fredette shot better from the field with that same lackluster supporting cast, and only turned the ball over because he played with that cast. When he had Brandon Davies, there was noticeably less turnovers coming from him. Fredette definitely demonstrates better decision-making skills when he has had talent on his team, from a PG standpoint and from a shot selection standpoint as well.

JNixon
JNixon's picture
Registered User
Joined: 04/14/2009
Posts: 12959
Points: 11022
Offline
"Derrick rose had 4.7 assists

"Derrick rose had 4.7 assists in college Kemba had 4.5 and 5.1 his soph. Chris Paul only shot 45 percent in college. Deron Williams shot 40% 41% and 43% in college look at him now... Russell Westbrook in his soph year only averaged 12 ppg and 4.3 assists and then left for the NBA. Kemba isn't the only one to shoot a bit subpar in college and then become elite."

Derrick Rose was FAR less turnover prone and FAR more efficient from the floor than Walker could have ever thought about being when he was at Memphis.

Chris Paul's 45% from the floor is a very solid number from the field. Walker's 42% on more attempts as a Jr., and his whooping 40% as a Soph. are not as solid though.

Deron Williams slimmed down, got more explosive athelticaly, and is much more of a slasher than he was in college. Williams was much more of a jump shooter back then, which are why his %'s were low.

Russell Westbrook played off the ball because of Darren Collison in college. And that caused his numbers not to stand out as much.

cward23
Registered User
Joined: 04/16/2011
Posts: 617
Points: 170
Offline
You don't know what Walker

You don't know what Walker will be because he hasn't played yet. No one knows no matter how much you think you know the FACT is not one person knows what any of the players are gonna end up being, if they did there would be no such thing as bust or players piked to low or high

GottaBeTheShoes
Registered User
Joined: 06/04/2011
Posts: 839
Points: 2489
Offline
Kemba played 38 mpg... at

Kemba played 38 mpg... at least 25 of those at point and the rest getting the ball after a couple seconds so Kemba could MAKE A PLAY(aka Playmaker) Kemba beats jimmer in every category that isn't scoring(where jimmer only beats him because of his tremendous 3 point shooting ability). Most PG only play 30 mpg so really there isn't a difference. Most of jimmers turnovers happened after the brandon davies thing. Jimmer had as much help as kemba did. Here are some stats to prove Kemba had a normal FG% and assists for a point from college. Derrick rose had 4.7 assists in college Kemba had 4.5 and 5.1 his soph. Chris Paul only shot 45 percent in college. Deron Williams shot 40% 41% and 43% in college look at him now... Russell Westbrook in his soph year only averaged 12 ppg and 4.3 assists and then left for the NBA.Steve Nash in college shot under 43% in his freshman sophomore and Senior year(junior year shot 44%) Kemba isn't the only one to shoot a bit subpar in college.. All of those the top 5 point guards in the league. So now what do you have to say?

JNixon
JNixon's picture
Registered User
Joined: 04/14/2009
Posts: 12959
Points: 11022
Offline
"Kemba played 38 mpg... at

"Kemba played 38 mpg... at least 25 of those at point and the rest getting the ball after a couple seconds so Kemba could MAKE A PLAY(aka Playmaker) Kemba beats jimmer in every category that isn't scoring(where jimmer only beats him because of his tremendous 3 point shooting ability). Most PG only play 30 mpg so really there isn't a difference. Most of jimmers turnovers happened after the brandon davies thing. Jimmer had as much help as kemba did. Here are some stats to prove Kemba had a normal FG% and assists for a point from college. Derrick rose had 4.7 assists in college Kemba had 4.5 and 5.1 his soph. Chris Paul only shot 45 percent in college. Deron Williams shot 40% 41% and 43% in college look at him now... Russell Westbrook in his soph year only averaged 12 ppg and 4.3 assists and then left for the NBA.Steve Nash in college shot under 43% in his freshman sophomore and Senior year(junior year shot 44%) Kemba isn't the only one to shoot a bit subpar in college.. All of those the top 5 point guards in the league. So now what do you have to say?"

He probably played less than half of his minutes at PG, and as a playmaker I mean for others. We all know he can make plays scoring.

Kemba Walker didn't score as much as Jimmer Fredette at any point of his career when both were playing college basketball, so how does he "score" better? He also has never been as efficient, which is a huge factor in determining who scores better.

You've silly if you think BYU gave Fredette as much help as UConn had for Kemba Walker. Jeremy Lamb, Alex Oriakhi and Shabazz Napier are better than any player on BYU's team w/o Davies.

RSS: Syndicate content