share

If you take the best player of each team...

Mr.BigShot
Registered User
Joined: 05/03/2010
Posts: 181
Points: 1300
Offline
If you take the best player of each team...

Who would best team, and who would be in the championship?

I still think the Lakers could be playing for a championship without Kobe, but for the east it will probably be the Hawks, as they don't have 'star' players they have good players.


IndianaBasketball
IndianaBasketball's picture
Registered User
Joined: 05/09/2009
Posts: 12753
Points: 24201
Offline
Wait... You think the Lakers

Wait... You think the Lakers would be playing for a championship without Kobe Bryant? That's crazy...

Toronto16
Toronto16's picture
Registered User
Joined: 07/17/2009
Posts: 2710
Points: 4120
Offline
^ I agree. Too much emphasis

^ I agree. Too much emphasis is put on Pau Gasol, and people tend to forget how mediocre he was in Memphis. With all the single coverage he gets in LA, he's been looking like a star because of Kobe. So now way LA is this good without Kobe.

I'll say take the best player off Boston (Rondo) and they'll still be respectable.

JNixon
JNixon's picture
Registered User
Joined: 04/14/2009
Posts: 12962
Points: 11537
Offline
I think the Celtics would win

I think the Celtics would win it all honestly. They'd be without either Paul Pierce or Rondo (depending on who you think is better), but I think they have enough firepower to win a title without their #1 guy.

JNixon
JNixon's picture
Registered User
Joined: 04/14/2009
Posts: 12962
Points: 11537
Offline
Pau Gasol wasn't mediocre in

Pau Gasol wasn't mediocre in Memphis, that was pretty modest churchboy1. He was a great player on a bad team.

B-ball fan
Registered User
Joined: 08/01/2009
Posts: 2108
Points: 2236
Offline
Celtics

They would still be pretty good without Rondo if every other team was without its star. Ray Allen would have to handle the ball more. Tony Allen, Nate Robinson, and Marquis Daniels would all have bigger roles.

Mr.BigShot
Registered User
Joined: 05/03/2010
Posts: 181
Points: 1300
Offline
Who else you got in the west

Who else you got in the west

OKC.. without Durant
Denver without MELO
Warriors without Ellis
Memphis without Mayo
Kings without Tyreke
JAZZ without Deron Williams
SUNS without Nash
Clippers without Kaman
Minnesota without Jefferson
New Orleans without Paul
Houston without Yao
San Antonio without Duncan
Portland without Roy
Dallas without Dirk

The only other team that would even challenge them are the Mavs.

DMV_LeGenD
DMV_LeGenD's picture
Registered User
Joined: 05/14/2009
Posts: 3446
Points: 4373
Offline
Celtics

I think Boston would be the best team. Some people might not agree with me, but Rondo is there best player now. They wouldn't be as good, but they would still be great. They would still have Pierce, Garnett, Allen, and some solid role players. Without Rondo, that's still a championship caliber team.

Mr.BigShot
Registered User
Joined: 05/03/2010
Posts: 181
Points: 1300
Offline
I will say this take best

I will say this take best player off every team, and the NBA becomes much more closer in terms of talent.

B-ball fan
Registered User
Joined: 08/01/2009
Posts: 2108
Points: 2236
Offline
Suns

They would still be OK with Dragic and Barbosa at point. They are a deep team. Rockets: they would still be without Yao, but they would definitely be a playoff team if every other team was missing their star. They might be a top 3 seed. I agree that the Hawks would be really tough to face. They don't rely on one player. Josh Smith actually has a better plus/minus than Joe Johnson.

Michael.S.
Registered User
Joined: 05/10/2009
Posts: 5992
Points: 1962
Offline
Yeah take every star player

Yeah take every star player off every team and LA and boston still have the best teams..with maybe the magic there also...It is not absurd to think LA could win in that scenario

B-ball fan
Registered User
Joined: 08/01/2009
Posts: 2108
Points: 2236
Offline
Warriors

Monta Ellis is not better than Stephen Curry.

JNixon
JNixon's picture
Registered User
Joined: 04/14/2009
Posts: 12962
Points: 11537
Offline
The Warriors sucked with

The Warriors sucked with their best players available, so the Warriors deserve no mention.

Nugz10
Registered User
Joined: 05/23/2010
Posts: 15
Points: 23
Offline
Warriors

Would the warriors actually be better without having monta ellis jack up his 20 shots a game? lol

Meditated States
Meditated States's picture
Registered User
Joined: 04/29/2009
Posts: 2827
Points: 579
Offline
Lakers

Would be trash without KB. TRASH

ajthejuiceman
ajthejuiceman's picture
Registered User
Joined: 07/28/2009
Posts: 144
Points: 88
Offline
he shot 45% i dont think he

he shot 45% i dont think he was jus jacking, actually the warriors were pretty damn good with all their players

Pacers_Fan33
Registered User
Joined: 04/17/2010
Posts: 144
Points: 288
Offline
Lakers

Gotta be the Lakers, Kobe easily has the best supporting cast in the league, and this isnt a kobe-hate post, he will be the 3rd best player ever when he's done

MagikKnick
MagikKnick's picture
Registered User
Joined: 07/07/2009
Posts: 3514
Points: 5916
Offline
Its funny, because when you

Its funny, because when you narrow it down it'll probably be the same teams that are playing in the finals right now

Celtics and Lakers

Celts without there best player [imma say Rondo], is still a really good team to me, obviously they'd have a gap at the PG spot bigger then the one in Michael Strahans teeth, but im sure they'd still be pretty good

Nd the Lakers, would be alot worse, but they'd still be good...if that makes anysense...
Not sure about competing for a title, but they'd be a legit playoff team without the Mamba

sc0rebuckets11
sc0rebuckets11's picture
Registered User
Joined: 01/03/2009
Posts: 281
Points: 145
Offline
also..

When you take Kobe off the Lakers, you are losing a lot.. it's also like he's the pg for the team. Don't get it twisted, fish is more like an off-guard. Kobe just does a lot for that team, and the Triangle offense is pretty complex.

I'd say the Celtics. I think with Doc Rivers.. and the veteran leadership, Nate Rob could run the show well enough.

DaGuywhodidurma
DaGuywhodidurma's picture
Registered User
Joined: 04/15/2010
Posts: 210
Points: 483
Offline
suns?

if you take nash off the suns they would completely suck. do you remember how many games amare won with out him? not many nash creates offence for everyone on that team his pass that arent credited to him as passes lead to points. if this were hockey he'd average 25 assists per game. only the mavericks, lakers and maybe the spurs would be good everyone else would be above average.

Tongue-Out-Like-23
Tongue-Out-Like-23's picture
Registered User
Joined: 03/16/2010
Posts: 8307
Points: 11858
Offline
Houston Rockets Remember last

Houston Rockets

Remember last year? They lost their TWO star players, not just 1. and they nearly made it to the Conference Finals

Cusemen727
Registered User
Joined: 11/13/2009
Posts: 243
Points: 275
Offline
Celtics and Lakers

You dont get to the finals by just one player, so obviously the lakers and celtics still have a good team t if you took away there superstar(lakers-kobe celts-Rajon) So Id have to go with the same finals, And for all these laker haters on here(im not a laker fan by any means), theyre still a competitive team without kobe, obviously not nearly as good but didnt they go like 9-3 or something without him this year.

Leftovers16
Registered User
Joined: 05/25/2010
Posts: 247
Points: -18
Offline
Wow Rondo DRs

Rondo is an average player surrounded by allstars... Teams without their best player is a team that will not be winning any title anyways so it's kinda dumb to even wonder what it will be like... Lakers, Celtics, Spurs, vet teams with better luck that day I would say would win... He plays a few good game we label him the best player on the team if he was on any other team he would be average at best he can't shot, hit fts, defend with toughness, I see better pgs in the league...Rondo is not that good watch in a few years when the 3 are gone Boston gonna be like back then with a "good" player and couldn't win any games

NYK2010
Registered User
Joined: 05/09/2009
Posts: 2462
Points: 1498
Offline
Lakers in the Finals w/out

Lakers in the Finals w/out Kobe hmmm interesting.
Fisher is clutch but the rest not really guess La Machine is your SG or Brown.
Can see the Lakers and Celtics in the Finals still.
Not sure how you would put Orlando even in the Conference Finals w/out Howard those 3 pt shooters don't do much by themselves.

Also Kobe the 3rd best player of all-time thats pushing it I think.
Can't be unless you saw Kareem, Wilt, Russell, Oscar and others early in their youth and prime.
I'll leave that debate up to the old timers.

kingsfan73
kingsfan73's picture
Registered User
Joined: 05/27/2010
Posts: 13
Points: 5
Offline
im not understanding the

im not understanding the statements about kobe being the third best when hes done, who is in between him and jordan, he will be second, with all his points and all star games and the mvp he won two years ago to go along with his 4 titles, he could realistically win 3 or 4 more titles, statistically he will finish number two, and no matter what, he should never be considered better than jordan

NYK2010
Registered User
Joined: 05/09/2009
Posts: 2462
Points: 1498
Offline
Where do you get 3-4 more

Where do you get 3-4 more rings from its not that easy and if he does win 3 or 4 more rings he's probably better than Jordan.
Doubtful he wins that many more as this is the Lakers team for the next few years.
Fisher will be pushing 37 end of next year and Jackson won't be around for that much longer.
Bynum is another major knee injury from being an after thought.

kingsfan73
kingsfan73's picture
Registered User
Joined: 05/27/2010
Posts: 13
Points: 5
Offline
i dont really think he will

i dont really think he will win 3 or 4 more but it could happen, hes that great, the LA front office knows what theyre doing, obviously it would be easier with phil jackson but if he goes they will get another good coach like avery johnson or something, and more rings doesnt make you a better player, i dont think bill russell's 11 or robert horry's 7 rings have ever made them a better player than jordan

The Scare Crow ...
Registered User
Joined: 04/17/2010
Posts: 3185
Points: 1005
Offline
The Blazers Would win Ring in that scenario

they are deep as hell and talented to boot....Roy would replaced by 4 guys(Webster,Rudy,Bayless,Batum) They all do a little bit of what B.Roy does by himself...I gotta think the Blazers are looking for the New B.Roy in this years draft....

NYK2010
Registered User
Joined: 05/09/2009
Posts: 2462
Points: 1498
Offline
I don't see the Lakers

I don't see the Lakers pulling off another steal like they did with Gasol.
The Bynum pick was smart outside of that they haven't done anything special.
Brown and Fisher fell into their lap.
Also not sure any of these guys have the drive to win like Kobe or Fisher.
Sooner or later they get complacent.

llperez
llperez's picture
Registered User
Joined: 04/13/2009
Posts: 11965
Points: 11949
Offline
i think the magic would still

i think the magic would still be a playoff team without dwight. Gortat is one of the best back up centers in the league and can put up 10 and 10 on the regular. Bass would also get more minutes and he is an underrated player.

Leftovers16
Registered User
Joined: 05/25/2010
Posts: 247
Points: -18
Offline
Kings fan support

Same here who da hell is number 2 if kobe is 3 u can argue lebron but that's another story

RSS: Syndicate content