This topic contains 32 replies, has 14 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar Mopgrass 10 years, 2 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #53297
    AvatarAvatar
    valentine

    do they go with Embiid and create an imposing three big man rotation of favors embiid and kanter?

    do they go with the mormon sensation parker. and slide hayward to the 2?

    or do they go with wiggins and play him at the 2 and hayward at the 3?

     

     

     

      

    0
  • #860948
    AvatarAvatar
    B-ball fan
    Participant

     They should go Wiggins.  Burke and Hayward can help keep some of the ball-handling load off him, while Wiggins brings star potential.  I think they are committed more to Favors as their center of the future.  Favors and Kanter have struggled to play together, so Embiid isn’t the ideal fit.  Parker wouldn’t be a bad selection, I just favor Wiggins as the superior prospect who gives them some explosiveness they are lacking.

    0
  • #860843
    AvatarAvatar
    B-ball fan
    Participant

     They should go Wiggins.  Burke and Hayward can help keep some of the ball-handling load off him, while Wiggins brings star potential.  I think they are committed more to Favors as their center of the future.  Favors and Kanter have struggled to play together, so Embiid isn’t the ideal fit.  Parker wouldn’t be a bad selection, I just favor Wiggins as the superior prospect who gives them some explosiveness they are lacking.

    0
  • #860954
    AvatarAvatar
    aaucoach
    Participant

     if they got it,the best fit for them would be randle.they need inside scoring and they already have 2 defensive minded bigs in favors and kanter to pair him with.they have been playing favors at the 5 with kanter backing him up so randle could come in and start at the 4.i wouldnt want to take randle with the top pick,but he would be the best fit for what they need

    0
  • #860849
    AvatarAvatar
    aaucoach
    Participant

     if they got it,the best fit for them would be randle.they need inside scoring and they already have 2 defensive minded bigs in favors and kanter to pair him with.they have been playing favors at the 5 with kanter backing him up so randle could come in and start at the 4.i wouldnt want to take randle with the top pick,but he would be the best fit for what they need

    0
  • #860956
    AvatarAvatar
    Moon River
    Participant

    I think the only way they go Parker is if they lose Hayward.  Do you think Hayward could play the 2?  I could see that being a problem for him defensively.

    0
  • #860851
    AvatarAvatar
    Moon River
    Participant

    I think the only way they go Parker is if they lose Hayward.  Do you think Hayward could play the 2?  I could see that being a problem for him defensively.

    0
  • #860962
    AvatarAvatar
    HobbyOG
    Participant

     no brainer, you go with Parker! He would be great for marketing, he’s a morom and that’ morom capital. And he can ball! Move Gordon to SG. 

    0
  • #860857
    AvatarAvatar
    HobbyOG
    Participant

     no brainer, you go with Parker! He would be great for marketing, he’s a morom and that’ morom capital. And he can ball! Move Gordon to SG. 

    0
  • #860966
    AvatarAvatar
    Bajeebz
    Participant

    I like both Wiggins and Embiid, but this video tells the real story about who the Utah Jazz want come draft day:

    0
  • #860860
    AvatarAvatar
    Bajeebz
    Participant

    I like both Wiggins and Embiid, but this video tells the real story about who the Utah Jazz want come draft day:

    0
    • #861014
      AvatarAvatar
      HobbyOG
      Participant

       hahaha that’s gotta be the worst video ever, Jabari prob seen this and was like heck no I’m going to BYU 

      0
    • #860909
      AvatarAvatar
      HobbyOG
      Participant

       hahaha that’s gotta be the worst video ever, Jabari prob seen this and was like heck no I’m going to BYU 

      0
  • #860968
    AvatarAvatar
    Prime Time
    Participant

     Wiggins fits a need and has superstar potential. The Jazz need a good defender on the wing and he would immediately guard the opposing team’s best wing player.

    I still think Kanter and Favors can work. They just need more experience. So Embiid and Randle aren’t really a need for the Jazz.

    Parker would work as well, and would be very marketable. I would just rather add some defense to the team.

     

    0
  • #860862
    AvatarAvatar
    Prime Time
    Participant

     Wiggins fits a need and has superstar potential. The Jazz need a good defender on the wing and he would immediately guard the opposing team’s best wing player.

    I still think Kanter and Favors can work. They just need more experience. So Embiid and Randle aren’t really a need for the Jazz.

    Parker would work as well, and would be very marketable. I would just rather add some defense to the team.

     

    0
  • #860974
    AvatarAvatar
    Tyrober
    Participant

     They definitely go Parker or Wiggins. I think they take Parker and he stays in Utah for a long long time.

    0
  • #860868
    AvatarAvatar
    Tyrober
    Participant

     They definitely go Parker or Wiggins. I think they take Parker and he stays in Utah for a long long time.

    0
  • #860980
    AvatarAvatar
    Moon River
    Participant

    The Bucks are getting the #1 pick!

    0
  • #860875
    AvatarAvatar
    Moon River
    Participant

    The Bucks are getting the #1 pick!

    0
  • #861017
    AvatarAvatar
    jwall1
    Participant

     I would go with Jabari. This team lacks offensive firepower and Jabari IMO is the most surefire star in the draft. Also, I think Hayward would do well at the 2 and it would give Utah good size on the wings.

    0
  • #861122
    AvatarAvatar
    jwall1
    Participant

     I would go with Jabari. This team lacks offensive firepower and Jabari IMO is the most surefire star in the draft. Also, I think Hayward would do well at the 2 and it would give Utah good size on the wings.

    0
  • #861019
    AvatarAvatar
    thunderjerk
    Participant

     I like Wiggins and Smart because of their defensive potential, Parker because he could be "the dude" on offense for a team that already has the pieces around him. The Jazz just need a guy to play the 2 or the 3. Hayward has mostly played the 2 this year; I feel like he’s better on O at the 2 and better at D at the 3. If the team has the #1 pick, I could see them taking Parker because of the need of scoring and because he fits the culture. 

    0
  • #861124
    AvatarAvatar
    thunderjerk
    Participant

     I like Wiggins and Smart because of their defensive potential, Parker because he could be "the dude" on offense for a team that already has the pieces around him. The Jazz just need a guy to play the 2 or the 3. Hayward has mostly played the 2 this year; I feel like he’s better on O at the 2 and better at D at the 3. If the team has the #1 pick, I could see them taking Parker because of the need of scoring and because he fits the culture. 

    0
  • #872809
    AvatarAvatar
    runBruce
    Participant

     wiggins or embiid

    0
  • #872915
    AvatarAvatar
    runBruce
    Participant

     wiggins or embiid

    0
  • #873019
    AvatarAvatar
    Mopgrass
    Participant

    Yes, yes, yes, everyone likes Parker for the Jazz. If they drop a few spots, I like Randle for them. Seems like they could use a scorer either way.

    0
  • #872912
    AvatarAvatar
    Mopgrass
    Participant

    Yes, yes, yes, everyone likes Parker for the Jazz. If they drop a few spots, I like Randle for them. Seems like they could use a scorer either way.

    0

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login