share

In honor of my all time favorite player growing up birthday today.

For_Never_Ever
For_Never_Ever's picture
Registered User
Joined: 08/14/2011
Posts: 2977
Points: 3669
Offline
In honor of my all time favorite player growing up birthday today.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UqZKSlrGfx8

Sorry, I couldn't embed this video.


Bird_Years
Bird_Years's picture
Registered User
Joined: 04/16/2012
Posts: 204
Points: 464
Offline
Question for everybody, how

Question for everybody, how good would Larry Bird be in today's NBA?

I believe his production would take a dip, but not too severe. He might struggle some nights against teams with long athletic defenders like Ibaka or Garnett but at the end of the day his offensive game was so multi-dimensional that he would still be a super star

I doubt he would average 10 rebounds a game but he should still be able to put up 25 points a night and 5 or 6 assists.

For_Never_Ever
For_Never_Ever's picture
Registered User
Joined: 08/14/2011
Posts: 2977
Points: 3669
Offline
Bird would be an effective

Bird would be an effective player because of his great shooting and intense competitive nature. There are plenty of averagely athletic players who are/were successful todays game, Joe Johnson, Billups, Paul Pierce, Steve Nash. Kevin Love. Peja Stojakovic at one point averaged something like 25 ppg 5apg for 5 years straight, I believe. I have no doubt he'll be a Star, but I'm not sure a Superstar because being athletic does count and put you up another notch. There are exception like Kevin Durant who isn't the greatest athlete, but he is 6'11 with a 7'5 wingspan.

For_Never_Ever
For_Never_Ever's picture
Registered User
Joined: 08/14/2011
Posts: 2977
Points: 3669
Offline
I'll take that back, kevin

I'll take that back, kevin Durant is a pretty good athlete and is a lot better than what he showed at the combine now.

chall23
Registered User
Joined: 02/16/2012
Posts: 122
Points: 420
Offline
JJ not athletic?

Joe Johnson was one of the most atletic people in the league when he was younger and hes still a very athletic player.... come on man

For_Never_Ever
For_Never_Ever's picture
Registered User
Joined: 08/14/2011
Posts: 2977
Points: 3669
Offline
I think you really need to

I think you really need to get eye's sight checked.

For_Never_Ever
For_Never_Ever's picture
Registered User
Joined: 08/14/2011
Posts: 2977
Points: 3669
Offline
your

your

Siggy
Registered User
Joined: 02/25/2012
Posts: 2926
Points: 5187
Offline
I don't think he'd be AS

I don't think he'd be AS prolific as he was in the 80s in terms of scoring, not because of the athletes, but because of the defensive philosophies. Teams are more willing and eager to double now especially in the post where Bird did a lot of his damage. They're also able to because of the defensive rule changes as well. He'd still shoot lights out and he'd still have a counter for everything. I actually think he'd be an even more prolific passer because he'd be seeing more doubles.
I could still see Larry still putting up a line of something like 24-8-7 on good percentages in this era.

WizKid
WizKid's picture
Registered User
Joined: 01/20/2010
Posts: 2023
Points: 4399
Offline
He would also not have the

He would also not have the luxury of play with two hall of famers behind him..

Reeko
Registered User
Joined: 11/18/2012
Posts: 186
Points: 595
Offline
Huh?

How do you know wouldn't have played with 2 HOF'ers? Did you see that in your crystal ball? And btw he played with closer to 4 Hall of Famers: Kevin Mchale, Dennis Johnson, Robert Parish and Bill Walton. As far as would he be as good today? He'd be as good if not better with the advances in sports science and strength and conditioning, the former enabling him to extend his career beyond 13 seasons 4 of which he with a horrendous back and required traction many nights. I my opinion Larry Bird was the smartest basketball player to ever play the game, and let us not forget that he played and dominated during the Golden Era of the NBA, when he tortured guys in the Eastern Conference like: Isaiah Thomas, Dominique Wilkins, and yea for a little while there... Michael Jordan and Scottie Pippen. He is still the greatest small forward ever, Lebron's time is coming and maybe in a couple of years I won't be able to say that, but today I can.

For_Never_Ever
For_Never_Ever's picture
Registered User
Joined: 08/14/2011
Posts: 2977
Points: 3669
Offline
Damn, someone is going on a

Damn, someone is going on a negging spree on a lot of postes.
Well we wouldn't know if he would be playing with Paul Pierce and Rajon Rondo either if you put it like that.

BasketballJunkie224
BasketballJunkie224's picture
Registered User
Joined: 10/14/2012
Posts: 692
Points: 9
Offline
lolololol nobody playing back

lolololol nobody playing back then would be a star..not even jordan..let alone (gulp) larry bird? lololol come ON

For_Never_Ever
For_Never_Ever's picture
Registered User
Joined: 08/14/2011
Posts: 2977
Points: 3669
Offline
I can't tell, but are you

I can't tell, but are you being sarcastic ?

Siggy
Registered User
Joined: 02/25/2012
Posts: 2926
Points: 5187
Offline
Probably not, just young and

Probably not, just young and naive most likely.

Hale
Hale's picture
Registered User
Joined: 05/08/2009
Posts: 5956
Points: 12847
Offline
It's not like Jordan averaged

It's not like Jordan averaged 20 6 and 4 at age 40 or anything in the league while guys like Kobe, Pierce, T-Mac and VC in or around their primes...

Seriously how does this not have more negatives? Might be the worst post I've ever seen.

aamir543
aamir543's picture
Registered User
Joined: 04/11/2009
Posts: 5063
Points: 5542
Offline
He'd be a first ballot Hall

He'd be a first ballot Hall Of Famer, end of story.

No_Left
No_Left's picture
Registered User
Joined: 07/08/2011
Posts: 922
Points: 2403
Offline
Bird would absolutely be

Bird would absolutely be effective in today's game. Let's not forget it was much harder for perimeter guys to score during the years he played. Bird was a good shooter and ball handler who would be able to get to the line easily if he played today.

Mkadoza
Mkadoza's picture
Registered User
Joined: 07/15/2009
Posts: 1394
Points: 1421
Offline
Bird would be a combo forward

Bird would be a combo forward that no one could match up with. He'd instantly be the 1)best low post scorer from a fundamental perspective, 2) best post passer 3) best mid range jump-shooter (think Dirk) and 4) probably th ebest basketball IQ. Combine the fact that he was a superb ball handler, excellent shooter from everywhere, a smart defender, and a legit 6'9" how would he not score ~25 points, get 8 boards and average 5+ assists. Still a first ballot hall of famer.

ItsVictorOladipo
ItsVictorOladipo's picture
Registered User
Joined: 08/11/2009
Posts: 2053
Points: 4749
Offline
Dennis Rodman used to guard

Dennis Rodman used to guard Bird. If Bird could put up major numbers on one of the greatest defensive forwards in NBA history I don't see why he couldn't do it in today's game.

In 1992, at the age of 35 AND riddled with back problems he averaged 20.2 PPG, 9.6 RPG and 6.8 APG. The game really hasn't changed to the extent in the last 20 years that he would become ineffective...

RSS: Syndicate content