This topic contains 12 replies, has 2 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar Nbafanman 9 years, 10 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #56353
    AvatarAvatar
    Nbafanman
    Participant

    I think they’re the perfect college teammate pairing at picks 16 and 19 for the bulls. They need to get DRose another back court mate and they need some more outside shooting which both guys bring. They can use Payne as their backup PF/C when they decide to amnesty boozer and go for Carmelo.

    Chicago lineup: Rose/Hinrich, Butler/Harris, Melo/Dunleavy, Taj/Payne, Noah/Payne

    if Chicago trades up to #9 #10 or even #11 to get the guy they really want (James Young)

    then I still believe Harris and Payne r a great pairing at #16 and #19 for either the Hornets, Sixers, or Nuggets.

    Hornets: Kemba/Neal, Henderson/Harris, MKG/Taylor, Payne/Mcroberts, Jefferson/Zeller

    Sixers: MCW/Wroten, Harris/Anderson, Thaddeus/Jrich, Payne/Moultrie, Noel/Mullens

    Nuggets: Lawson/Robinson, Harris/Foye, Gallo/Chandler, Faried/Payne, Hickson/McGee

    in all 4 scenarios (Bulls,Hornets,Sixers,Nuggets) I believe the Spartans would be the right picks at 16 and 19 and they contribute on both ends at a high level from day one.

    Of course none of this happens if Harris doesn’t fall to 16 but with all the young guys with promising potential and Harris probably being the 3rd best sg on the board behind young and Stauskus (not including smart/Lavine who are PG’s) I believe both guys r still on the board at 16 and 19 and would make a team better instantly.

    0
  • #919107
    AvatarAvatar
    AwrightAwrightAwright
    Participant

     In your sixers lineup,  where’s our #3 pick ?

    0
  • #919239
    AvatarAvatar
    AwrightAwrightAwright
    Participant

     In your sixers lineup,  where’s our #3 pick ?

    0
  • #919110
    AvatarAvatar
    Nbafanman
    Participant

     I totally left that out. How about wiggins/Parker at the 3 with Thaddeus at the 4 and Payne backing him up

    0
    • #919136
      AvatarAvatar
      AwrightAwrightAwright
      Participant

      I didn’t neg you by the way.  ( I don’t neg people unless the post was outlandishly retarded ).  

      0
    • #919267
      AvatarAvatar
      AwrightAwrightAwright
      Participant

      I didn’t neg you by the way.  ( I don’t neg people unless the post was outlandishly retarded ).  

      0
  • #919241
    AvatarAvatar
    Nbafanman
    Participant

     I totally left that out. How about wiggins/Parker at the 3 with Thaddeus at the 4 and Payne backing him up

    0
  • #919134
    AvatarAvatar
    AwrightAwrightAwright
    Participant

     I mean that’s great that you have Wiggins or Parker at 3, and I’m all on board with that and all, but you’re picking Payne up just to back up Thad ?  Don’t you think someone like Payne deserves to be no less than a starter ?

    0
    • #919164
      AvatarAvatar
      Nbafanman
      Participant

       The Sixers would already be starting 3 rookies (wiggins/parker,harris,noel) I’m sure they’d have enough room for a rookie who can back up both the PF and C spot while getting quality minutes. Payne won’t start anywhere his first year but he’ll contribute off the bench right away. 

      0
    • #919295
      AvatarAvatar
      Nbafanman
      Participant

       The Sixers would already be starting 3 rookies (wiggins/parker,harris,noel) I’m sure they’d have enough room for a rookie who can back up both the PF and C spot while getting quality minutes. Payne won’t start anywhere his first year but he’ll contribute off the bench right away. 

      0
    • #919298
      AvatarAvatar
      Nbafanman
      Participant

       Also anyone the Sixers would get at that point (#19) would come off the bench. Only because at that point they would had already drafted wiggins/parker and harris

      0
    • #919166
      AvatarAvatar
      Nbafanman
      Participant

       Also anyone the Sixers would get at that point (#19) would come off the bench. Only because at that point they would had already drafted wiggins/parker and harris

      0
  • #919265
    AvatarAvatar
    AwrightAwrightAwright
    Participant

     I mean that’s great that you have Wiggins or Parker at 3, and I’m all on board with that and all, but you’re picking Payne up just to back up Thad ?  Don’t you think someone like Payne deserves to be no less than a starter ?

    0

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login