This topic contains 4 replies, has 4 voices, and was last updated by Lotto Stud 12 years, 3 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Fri, 01/13/2012 - 3:01pm #35549
Lotto StudParticipantWhat was the difference minus 1 being in the NBA?
0 - Posted on: Fri, 01/13/2012 - 3:26pm #624668
Da1potParticipantBoth of them are similar in that they are great athletes and undersized SGs. Shooting is neither of their strengths really, but Henderson is at least an average shooter and adept at driving. Harris on the other hand, is one of the worst shooters I have ever seen in my life. He wasn’t going to play point guard in the NBA, so there was no spot for him being that he’s an undersized shooting guard with no jumper whatsoever.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 01/13/2012 - 4:02pm #624682
B FreeParticipantHenderson has gotten this undersized label and I don’t get it he measured in at 6’5 215lbs with a 6’10 wingspan
0 - Posted on: Fri, 01/13/2012 - 4:37pm #624699
JNixonParticipantGerald Henderson is a more explosive athlete, and he has a higher skill level than Paul Harris. Paul Harris is a 6’4 235 PF basically, and even though he is a great athlete, rebounder, and an underrated passer, he shows little in terms of shooting skills, handle, or feel for the game compared to Henderson. Henderson isn’t a great shooter, and he still sort of plays like a 6’4 SF, but he did come to the NBA with a decent 15-18 ft. pull-up, and he was a better attacker off the dribble than Paul Harris ever was really.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 01/14/2012 - 3:17am #624848
Lotto StudParticipantHarris should be on a NBA roster.
0 - AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |