This topic contains 4 replies, has 4 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar Lotto Stud 12 years, 3 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • Posted on: Fri, 01/13/2012 - 3:01pm #35549
    AvatarAvatar
    Lotto Stud
    Participant

     What was the difference minus 1 being in the NBA?

    0
  • Posted on: Fri, 01/13/2012 - 3:26pm #624668
    AvatarAvatar
    Da1pot
    Participant

     Both of them are similar in that they are great athletes and undersized SGs. Shooting is neither of their strengths really, but Henderson is at least an average shooter and adept at driving. Harris on the other hand, is one of the worst shooters I have ever seen in my life. He wasn’t going to play point guard in the NBA, so there was no spot for him being that he’s an undersized shooting guard with no jumper whatsoever.

    0
  • Posted on: Fri, 01/13/2012 - 4:02pm #624682
    AvatarAvatar
    B Free
    Participant

     Henderson has gotten this undersized label and I don’t get it he measured in at 6’5 215lbs with a 6’10 wingspan

    0
  • Posted on: Fri, 01/13/2012 - 4:37pm #624699
    AvatarAvatar
    JNixon
    Participant

     Gerald Henderson is a more explosive athlete, and he has a higher skill level than Paul Harris. Paul Harris is a 6’4 235 PF basically, and even though he is a great athlete, rebounder, and an underrated passer, he shows little in terms of shooting skills, handle, or feel for the game compared to Henderson. Henderson isn’t a great shooter, and he still sort of plays like a 6’4 SF, but he did come to the NBA with a decent 15-18 ft. pull-up, and he was a better attacker off the dribble than Paul Harris ever was really.

    0
  • Posted on: Sat, 01/14/2012 - 3:17am #624848
    AvatarAvatar
    Lotto Stud
    Participant

     Harris should be on a NBA roster.

    0
  • Author
    Posts

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login