share

ESPN's Kevin Pelton gives his trade grades

Alter_Ego
Registered User
Joined: 07/31/2014
Posts: 37
Points: 87
Offline
ESPN's Kevin Pelton gives his trade grades

If you don't have ESPN insider here is the article Kevin Pelton wrote grading each team on what they got in the Kevin Love/Andrew Wiggins deal.

The deal:

Cleveland Cavaliers get: Forward Kevin Love

Minnesota Timberwolves get: Guard/forward Andrew Wiggins, forward Anthony Bennett, forward Thaddeus Young and a $6.3 million trade exception.

Philadelphia 76ers get: Luc Richard Mbah A Moute, Alexey Shved, a future first-round pick (Miami's 2015 protected first-round pick)

Cleveland: A

The history of trades involving superstars is clear: The team getting the star almost always wins. This particular trade is somewhat unique because of the quality of the player heading the other direction. In Wiggins, the Cavaliers are giving up the No. 1 pick in what was considered a loaded draft, a player our Chad Ford called one of the 10 best draft prospects of the past 15 years. And this deal should still be a steal for Cleveland. It was easy to fall in love with the idea of Wiggins growing into the role of LeBron James' sidekick on the wing, taking the tougher defensive assignment and burning teams that put their best defender on James. But the timing wasn't quite right. Based on his translated college stats, Wiggins doesn't figure to be an immediate help on offense. If Wiggins ever does become a Scottie Pippen-type player -- and his performance at Kansas raised serious doubts about his potential to create his own offense at a star level -- it won't be until James is well into his 30s. The Cavaliers' window to win is now, while James is the league's best player, and Love's versatility makes him one of the best possible offensive complements for the four-time MVP. Further, it's hardly like Cleveland is sacrificing its future by dealing for a 25-year-old player. Health aside, Love is a sure thing, which is something that can't be said of Wiggins. That's why I estimated earlier this offseason that Love's trade value -- the value of his performance minus his likely salary -- was far greater than the value of the typical No. 1 pick. There is an important caveat to that analysis: It assumes that Love re-signs with the Cavaliers, which isn't yet a sure thing. The risk Cleveland is taking here is that things unexpectedly go south and this becomes a repeat of one of the few trades for a superstar gone bust in recent years: Dwight Howard to the L.A. Lakers. In that scenario, giving up Wiggins would be a disaster for the Cavaliers. Love must hit free agency rather than signing a contract extension to maximize his salary, and it doesn't appear he'll opt in to the final season of his contract (2015-16) as part of the trade, which would have given Cleveland some more comfort and certainty about keeping him. Still, the odds of Love leaving a team that has James appear long, and this is a small risk the Cavaliers absolutely should have taken. Beyond Wiggins, Cleveland sacrificed relatively little. The Cavaliers still have their 2015 first-round pick, as well as one on the way from the Memphis Grizzlies at some point in the future. As for Bennett, it's unclear whether he's an asset or a liability in this trade. The issue is Bennett's salary, which is $5.5 million this season and $5.8 million in 2015-16 (a team option) before jumping to $7.3 million in 2016-17, another team option that must be picked up by the end of October 2015. To justify midlevel money or better, Bennett will have to improve massively from his below-replacement play as a rookie. His college play and a solid performance in this year's NBA Summer League offer reasons for hope, but it's far from certain Bennett will play out his rookie contract. And that's it. Cleveland didn't have to take back any salary or give up any of the nonguaranteed contracts acquired in a trade with the Utah Jazz last month, giving general manager David Griffin some trade options as the Cavaliers continue to fill out their roster and search for the rim protection and perimeter defense they're currently lacking. As a result, this trade looks great for Cleveland.

Minnesota: B-

The first way to analyze this trade is to decide whether it makes the Timberwolves a better team going forward, and the answer is it does. If Minnesota had a chance to retain Love with a playoff run, keeping him was the right idea. But the relationship between player and team seemed to deteriorate beyond repair this summer. Failing that, there's no way one year with Love, which might have resulted in a playoff berth but would not have guaranteed one, is worth more than four years of Wiggins' rookie contract plus his rights thereafter. The second way to analyze this trade is whether it's the best the Timberwolves could have made, and that's a bit trickier. A deal centered on Wiggins is the best package Minnesota could have gotten because of the aforementioned rookie contract. A David Lee-Klay Thompson trade would have given the Timberwolves just one year of Thompson's rookie deal before he gets a huge raise -- likely to the point of overpaying -- and while the Chicago Bulls might have been able to offer more total talent, they couldn't match the long-term upside of Wiggins. Ultimately, it doesn't appear Flip Saunders could credibly leverage the threat of other offers into Cleveland concessions beyond Wiggins. This incarnation of the trade doesn't save Minnesota any money and gives it no draft picks. What are left are two Timberwolves teams. There's the youngsters: Wiggins, Bennett, first-round pick Zach LaVine, and 2013 first-round picks Shabazz Muhammad and Gorgui Dieng. There's also an older core built of players such as Kevin Martin (31 years old) and Nikola Pekovic (28) built to win now. Though Young (26) is closer in age to Dieng (24) than Martin and Pekovic, his salary and possible free agency next summer put him in the latter group. Understandably, there's not much of an appetite for rebuilding in Minnesota, home of the longest playoff drought in the NBA (a decade and counting). And Saunders didn't name himself head coach just to develop young talent. Alas, wanting to make the playoffs isn't enough, especially in the Western Conference. The West is too strong and the drop from Love to Young is too severe for a run at the eighth seed to be more than a long shot. When the Timberwolves realize they can't compete, they'll find it difficult to get value for the veterans who make little sense on a rebuilding roster. Martin has three years and more than $21 million left on his contract, while Pekovic is owed nearly $48 million over the next four years. Minnesota has a better chance of landing a pick for Young, if not necessarily a first-rounder as good as the the team might regret sending to Philadelphia. The Timberwolves don't need to completely tear it down. They do need to make sure their young players have enough opportunity that Minnesota can figure out what it has beyond Wiggins and point guard Ricky Rubio. This is clearly an entertaining group of young talent, albeit one with more questions than answers about its future -- especially in the case of Bennett. But that was inevitably the case as the Timberwolves move on from Love.

Philadelphia: B+

After getting little value for Spencer Hawes and Evan Turner at last year's trade deadline, Sam Hinkie didn't wait as long to make a move with this year's potential free agent. Young, who can opt out of the final season of his contract (scheduled to pay him $9.9 million) next summer, was the last key player left from the pre-Hinkie Sixers, making the teardown of the roster complete. Young is a better player than Hawes and Turner, and I'm surprised no contender was more aggressive in making a move for him. But Philadelphia still managed to get two interesting pieces in return. Miami's 2015 first-round pick is top-10 protected, meaning there's an outside shot that if the Heat just miss the playoffs, the Sixers could get a late lottery selection. That's certainly a possibility depending on Dwyane Wade's health and just how many of Miami's weaknesses James was really covering up. For all the issues I outlined with Bennett earlier, he would have been a perfect fit for a Philadelphia team that needn't worry about the salary cap for years. So this trade looked better when we thought the Sixers were getting Bennett instead of the expiring contracts of Mbah a Moute and Shved. The former will be valuable to Philadelphia primarily as a veteran mentor for fellow Cameroonian Joel Embiid. At 25, with a solid international track record, Shved does offer a bit of upside. However, he's gone backward during two seasons in the NBA. Even if Shved does break out for the Sixers, they'd have to pay him as a restricted free agent next summer, making him less useful than a player on a rookie contract. Replacing the productive Young with -- well, I'm not exactly sure who's going to get those minutes -- means Philadelphia is likely to be no better than last season, even with the addition of Nerlens Noel and development of young players. With Embiid and Dario Saric waiting in the wings, along with another top lottery pick in the 2015 NBA draft, there's hope for the Sixers' future. But getting there is going to entail suffering through at least one more season as a laughingstock, and the 76ers can't count on the good luck in close games that helped them win 19 games in 2013-14.


he_gets_buckets
Registered User
Joined: 06/18/2012
Posts: 656
Points: 1655
Offline
I'm so sick of seeing ESPN

I'm so sick of seeing ESPN and Grantland and all these media outlets saying that Minny didnt get enough, oh this deal is so bad, they are giving up an All-Star for a "risky player". Since when did high potential mean high risk in all cases? Why is it that people seem to think that its more likely Andrew Wiggins turns into a scrub than an All-Star at ESPN? Minny had no leverage at this stage, and they got a lot of good pieces for going forward. Its not like they just got some scrubs to fit salary. Thad Young is a solid starter, Wiggins is a probable All-Star, Bennett is the only question mark.

What annoys me even more are the ESPN basketball analysts that say that the Golden State offer that was never even on the table of Klay Thompson, Barnes and Lee is in some way orders of magnitude better than the Cleveland deal. I like Klay, I really do, but he isn't going to be a number 1 option on a championship team. Wiggins has that potential, and then some. Lee is aging and on the decline, and production wise Young does much the same, whilst being a better defender and providing more excitement with his athleticism which is what Minny needs to sell tickets. Then Barnes, who has done not much outside of one playoff series to show he is worthy of starting, and even then it was as an undersized 4. He just hasn't developed the perimeter skills to be a starting 3 in this league, he is becoming the modern day Marvin Williams.

Minny got the best package they were possibly going to get for Love in this deal, its much better than a freaking B minus.

thparadox
thparadox's picture
Registered User
Joined: 06/13/2008
Posts: 444
Points: 518
Offline
I would give the T-wolves an

I would give the T-wolves an A+ on this trade.

However, I think you have to put Kevin Pelton's analysis in context. He is a statistical analyst, and he relies on his statistics (WARP) to make these grades.

I think that if you asked him "do you think Minnesota made a great trade?", he would say yes.

But because his WARP statistical system ranks Wiggins so poorly, that's included in his grade.

vulture711
Registered User
Joined: 06/21/2011
Posts: 359
Points: 743
Offline
Agreed

What they gave up was a guy who is a star on a bad team and won't resign after this year and in return got two hungry young guys and a solid veteran. Sounds like a steal to me

ExumInferno
Registered User
Joined: 05/26/2014
Posts: 203
Points: 104
Offline
Two top overall picks and a

Two top overall picks and a very capable veteran, but still young, forward in return for someone who was less than a year away from walking as a free agent is a good return in a trade.

Cleveland did very well, Minnesota did better than anyone thought they could.

Lafferty Daniel
Lafferty Daniel's picture
Registered User
Joined: 01/14/2013
Posts: 293
Points: 1332
Offline
B-

Thanks for posting this. Glad I'm not wasting money on an "insider" account.

joecheck88
joecheck88's picture
Registered User
Joined: 06/13/2008
Posts: 2820
Points: 2560
Offline
B- is a joke. Yea right now

B- is a joke. Yea right now Love is by far the beat player in the deal but considering he was leaving, Minny scored a home run. Orlando could only turn Dwight Howard into Nik Vucevic(who has exceeded expectations, very good player now) and Mo Harkless. Two young mid first round guys. Minny took a similar player(in terms of relevance in the league or top 10 guy) into 2 #1 overall picks and Thad Young. That's extremely great value. You can't do better for a rebuild except maybe pull an extra 1st or something but it's about a perfect deal for Minny.

I also like how it says Philly got value for Evan Turner. Huh? They got a second round pick. Granted, Turner was real bad on Indy but I think most think more could've been had for him at the time.

drpg913
Registered User
Joined: 07/01/2013
Posts: 122
Points: 113
Offline
B-?

The B- thing is very ridiculous Minny easily gets an A for that haul. They got 2 No.1 overall picks dumped salary and came away with one of the hardest playing players in the league for a guy they would have lost nothing for. All these NBA guys were quick to praise Utah for what they got for arguably the best point guard in the league at the time(I never subscribed to that but many people did) and that wasn't half as good as what the Wolves got.

Look at what the Thunder got ifor James Harden, What the Magic got for Dwight, What the Hornets got for CP3. I could go on and on but if you could ask any of those GM's would they have taken this deal for there Superstars I'm sure all of them would say yes in heartbeat.

Bmore_DC
Bmore_DC's picture
Registered User
Joined: 05/19/2010
Posts: 1014
Points: 1212
Offline
1 - Cleveland 2 - Minny 3 -

1 - Cleveland

2 - Minny

3 - Philly

How can Philly have a better grade than Minny when all they got for Young is expiring contracts and a mid-late 1st rounder? He even bashed Philly for not getting Bennett but still gave them a better grade than Minny? What a joke! I love the Twolves future.

RSS: Syndicate content