This topic contains 14 replies, has 7 voices, and was last updated by 
OhCanada- 9 years, 10 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Mon, 06/09/2014 - 5:32am #56185
LeFlopJAMESParticipantVonleh over Randle? Doubts
McDermott at 8°? Maybe at 14°…
0 - Posted on: Mon, 06/09/2014 - 6:00am #916241
juves4783Participantin defense of aran, i agree that vonleh will go ahead of randle. he is killing workouts and has the stretch 4 ability that seems to be the new hot skill set for power forwards. if you think about the top scorers at pf, they all have stretch abilities (love, aldridge, griffin, nowitzki, davis).
mcdermott at 8 is probably a stretch. sacramento could use a pg or pf.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 06/09/2014 - 6:00am #916109
juves4783Participantin defense of aran, i agree that vonleh will go ahead of randle. he is killing workouts and has the stretch 4 ability that seems to be the new hot skill set for power forwards. if you think about the top scorers at pf, they all have stretch abilities (love, aldridge, griffin, nowitzki, davis).
mcdermott at 8 is probably a stretch. sacramento could use a pg or pf.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 06/09/2014 - 6:09am #916255
SpartanGloryParticipantMcDermott in the lottery is a stretch.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 06/09/2014 - 6:09am #916123
SpartanGloryParticipantMcDermott in the lottery is a stretch.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 06/09/2014 - 6:10am #916257
JoeWolf1McDermott makes a lot of sense at 8 and 9. Both teams’ #1 option is a space eating big man. Doug’s shooting would be a great asset as far as spreading the floor at the 3 position.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 06/09/2014 - 6:10am #916125
JoeWolf1McDermott makes a lot of sense at 8 and 9. Both teams’ #1 option is a space eating big man. Doug’s shooting would be a great asset as far as spreading the floor at the 3 position.
0- Posted on: Mon, 06/09/2014 - 9:48am #916266
esperanzafleet69Participanti’d take stauskas all day over mcdermott at 8 or 9. mcdermott wasnt even a full inch taller than stauskas at the combine, and has about half of the playmaking skills.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 06/09/2014 - 9:48am #916398
esperanzafleet69Participanti’d take stauskas all day over mcdermott at 8 or 9. mcdermott wasnt even a full inch taller than stauskas at the combine, and has about half of the playmaking skills.
0
- Posted on: Mon, 06/09/2014 - 6:17am #916263
SpartanGloryParticipantFor me spreading the floor isn’t enough in a draft full of potential all stars. You can get floor spacing from Harris and Stauskus too and those guys have more translatable skills than McDermott. He was a great college player, but he’s a 3 pt shooter in the nba. Why not reach for more with that high of a pick?
0 - Posted on: Mon, 06/09/2014 - 6:17am #916131
SpartanGloryParticipantFor me spreading the floor isn’t enough in a draft full of potential all stars. You can get floor spacing from Harris and Stauskus too and those guys have more translatable skills than McDermott. He was a great college player, but he’s a 3 pt shooter in the nba. Why not reach for more with that high of a pick?
0 - Posted on: Mon, 06/09/2014 - 8:29am #916338
King CaluchaParticipantMock drafts at this time of the year are based on rumors, not where each player should go based on skill/potential.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 06/09/2014 - 8:29am #916206
King CaluchaParticipantMock drafts at this time of the year are based on rumors, not where each player should go based on skill/potential.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 06/09/2014 - 9:50am #916268
OhCanada-ParticipantWhat I cant understand is how Toronto selects 2 PG’s and 1 SG when after retaining last year those were the two teams strongest positions.
Nurkic is still a 2nd round pick.
Ejim is undrafted.
Austin is 60th.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 06/09/2014 - 9:50am #916400
OhCanada-ParticipantWhat I cant understand is how Toronto selects 2 PG’s and 1 SG when after retaining last year those were the two teams strongest positions.
Nurkic is still a 2nd round pick.
Ejim is undrafted.
Austin is 60th.
0 - AuthorPosts
| You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |