This topic contains 20 replies, has 10 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar BothTeamsPlayedHard 10 years, 6 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #51264
    AvatarAvatar
    juves4783
    Participant

    which team is doing the best tank job this offseason for a likely run at andrew wiggins next year?

    my vote is the bucks. they had the most questionable draft in picking giannis, a guy who many saw as a project. then they let monta ellis opt out without resigning him. they practically were forced to trade redick for nothing and then gave mbah a moute (their best perimeter defender) to the kings for nothing. mayo and ridnour can help the 3 pt shooting but are no replacements for ellis and redick. signing zaza with 6 bigs under contract makes you scratch your head too. delfino for dunleavy was practically a wash.

    the capper has to be their treatment of brandon jennings though. they practically slapped him in the face when they went after teague (only to be matched). there is no way jennings will re-sign with the bucks after that treatment and a guy with an ego that big is probably going to be a pain in the butt all season.

    nice try 76ers, but the bucks might pull the #1 pick in this lottery.

    0
  • #821023
    AvatarAvatar
    AmiableBaller34
    Participant

    To be honest I think letting go of Monta and Jennings is a good thing, kind of like what the Jazz did with Milsap and Big Al. Neither players are all-stars right now, and both are highly inefficient and want to get paid. Let them walk, and try to build a defensive minded team around Henson and Larry Sanders. The Bucks are just one of those teams that no one wants to play for, and they haven’t been bad enough to get a good pick. They’ve actually been pretty good drafting, so what’s a year or two of developing talent? I have no problem with what the Bucks are doing

    0
  • #820928
    AvatarAvatar
    AmiableBaller34
    Participant

    To be honest I think letting go of Monta and Jennings is a good thing, kind of like what the Jazz did with Milsap and Big Al. Neither players are all-stars right now, and both are highly inefficient and want to get paid. Let them walk, and try to build a defensive minded team around Henson and Larry Sanders. The Bucks are just one of those teams that no one wants to play for, and they haven’t been bad enough to get a good pick. They’ve actually been pretty good drafting, so what’s a year or two of developing talent? I have no problem with what the Bucks are doing

    0
  • #821027
    AvatarAvatar
    Sewok15
    Participant

    The Sixers traded an all star PG for a 19 year old who will only play half the season at most. They have almost nobody who can shoot on the roster outside of an aging Jason Richardson. They are tanking and not apologizing for it. As a Sixers fan I love it because they have been stuck in mediocrity for far too long.

    I think Phoenix is the only team bad enough to finish with a worst record at this point. In the end it will all be about how the lottery balls bounce but I would imagine those two teams will have the best odds of getting the 1st pick.

    0
  • #820932
    AvatarAvatar
    Sewok15
    Participant

    The Sixers traded an all star PG for a 19 year old who will only play half the season at most. They have almost nobody who can shoot on the roster outside of an aging Jason Richardson. They are tanking and not apologizing for it. As a Sixers fan I love it because they have been stuck in mediocrity for far too long.

    I think Phoenix is the only team bad enough to finish with a worst record at this point. In the end it will all be about how the lottery balls bounce but I would imagine those two teams will have the best odds of getting the 1st pick.

    0
  • #821033
    AvatarAvatar
    GottaBeTheShoes
    Participant

    I think everyone failed at creating a team worthy of tanking except the Sixers and Suns. The Sixers traded Holliday for a high risk high reward rookie that won’t play till around Christmas and a lottery Pick (which the Protection shouldn’t be a problem)
    So likely Noel and a 12-16 PIck and they picked up a raw but promising MCW, who has a lot of potential as a Floor General.
    They pretty much are automatic to be the 1st or 2nd worst team.

    The Suns picked up Bledsoe and Len which was questionable to me. I don’t see Len being too productive in the time he does play as a rookie and both Bledsoe and Len are added to their already 2 strongest positions the 1 and the 5. If they trade Gortat and Dragic, I could see them improving to a 5-10 pick but I could see them trading them for some picks or a couple promising young players.

    Not sure on the Magic, they have a lot of really good young developing players, they could be anywhere.

    I could also see the Jazz being pretty bad this year.

    Looking at the teams that seemed to be trying to tank that failed:
    Celtics – They got too much in return for Pierce and KG with Gerald Wallace and etc. Wallace is good enough to take them out of a top pick contention. While Olynyk is looking NBA Ready and may be able to produce pretty well right away. They also have Sullinger, Bradley, etc that will easily make them a 8-12 pick.
    Bucks – They picked up Mayo etc in FA which makes them quite a bit better than without them. They’re still in contention for a Top pick but I don’t know with a lot of their potential breakout players on their squad now.
    Hawks – F on their tanking Job. They prefer mediocrity and they won’t even make the playoffs.
    Charlotte – I don’t hate them for wanting to at least be a good team to watch for a year with picking up Jefferson, but let’s hope MKG and Zeller can pan out.

    0
  • #820938
    AvatarAvatar
    GottaBeTheShoes
    Participant

    I think everyone failed at creating a team worthy of tanking except the Sixers and Suns. The Sixers traded Holliday for a high risk high reward rookie that won’t play till around Christmas and a lottery Pick (which the Protection shouldn’t be a problem)
    So likely Noel and a 12-16 PIck and they picked up a raw but promising MCW, who has a lot of potential as a Floor General.
    They pretty much are automatic to be the 1st or 2nd worst team.

    The Suns picked up Bledsoe and Len which was questionable to me. I don’t see Len being too productive in the time he does play as a rookie and both Bledsoe and Len are added to their already 2 strongest positions the 1 and the 5. If they trade Gortat and Dragic, I could see them improving to a 5-10 pick but I could see them trading them for some picks or a couple promising young players.

    Not sure on the Magic, they have a lot of really good young developing players, they could be anywhere.

    I could also see the Jazz being pretty bad this year.

    Looking at the teams that seemed to be trying to tank that failed:
    Celtics – They got too much in return for Pierce and KG with Gerald Wallace and etc. Wallace is good enough to take them out of a top pick contention. While Olynyk is looking NBA Ready and may be able to produce pretty well right away. They also have Sullinger, Bradley, etc that will easily make them a 8-12 pick.
    Bucks – They picked up Mayo etc in FA which makes them quite a bit better than without them. They’re still in contention for a Top pick but I don’t know with a lot of their potential breakout players on their squad now.
    Hawks – F on their tanking Job. They prefer mediocrity and they won’t even make the playoffs.
    Charlotte – I don’t hate them for wanting to at least be a good team to watch for a year with picking up Jefferson, but let’s hope MKG and Zeller can pan out.

    0
    • #821077
      AvatarAvatar
      Suckerpunch
      Participant

      If the Celtics move Rondo, then i’d move them up

      0
    • #820982
      AvatarAvatar
      Suckerpunch
      Participant

      If the Celtics move Rondo, then i’d move them up

      0
  • #821045
    AvatarAvatar
    sammybuckeye13
    Participant

    The Jazz let their two leading scorers go and took on $24M of dead weight expirings in Jefferson, Biedrins and Rush. Besides these guys, no one on the team is older than 23.

    0
  • #820950
    AvatarAvatar
    sammybuckeye13
    Participant

    The Jazz let their two leading scorers go and took on $24M of dead weight expirings in Jefferson, Biedrins and Rush. Besides these guys, no one on the team is older than 23.

    0
  • #821061
    AvatarAvatar
    jjbutler73
    Participant

    Do you know what opt out means? He didn’t want to be there and they can’t force him. It’s called free agency.

    0
  • #820966
    AvatarAvatar
    jjbutler73
    Participant

    Do you know what opt out means? He didn’t want to be there and they can’t force him. It’s called free agency.

    0
    • #821048
      AvatarAvatar
      theTKOshow
      Participant

      not only did he opt out of his contract, he also turned down a 2 yr/24.8 mill extension from the bucks

      0
    • #821144
      AvatarAvatar
      theTKOshow
      Participant

      not only did he opt out of his contract, he also turned down a 2 yr/24.8 mill extension from the bucks

      0
  • #821012
    AvatarAvatar
    BrentSuriaga01
    Participant

    Should be a professor of Tanking 101. And hey, Sixers still doesn’t have a coach

    0
  • #821107
    AvatarAvatar
    BrentSuriaga01
    Participant

    Should be a professor of Tanking 101. And hey, Sixers still doesn’t have a coach

    0
  • #821032
    AvatarAvatar
    44ears81

    Kobe costs too much, nash is too old, no good young players, lost best player earl clark, pau gasol is washed up. But at least they have Robert Sacre.

    0
  • #821127
    AvatarAvatar
    44ears81

    Kobe costs too much, nash is too old, no good young players, lost best player earl clark, pau gasol is washed up. But at least they have Robert Sacre.

    0
  • #842776
    AvatarAvatar
    BothTeamsPlayedHard
    Participant

    WALTHAM, Mass. — For six years the question was whether the Celtics would win the championship. Now Danny Ainge finds himself overseeing a far less promising environment. All of the big names who played for or coached the championship team of 2007-08 are now in Los Angeles or Miami or Brooklyn or (in the case of Rajon Rondo) on indefinite leave. Instead of trying to win, should they now be trying to lose?

    “As I walk around town, more than anything else there are those that say, ‘Hey, don’t win too many games,”‘ said Ainge, the Celtics’ president of basketball operations. “There are so many fans that want us to play for the draft.”

    Ainge’s measured response is that they should be more careful what they wish for.

    “That’s harder than people recognize,” said Ainge of losing as a strategy. “It’s a really easy thing to conceptualize, and an easy thing to talk about and philosophize about. But it’s a hard thing to live through — for fans, for coaches, for owners, for sponsors, for our TV partners.”

    It was the pain of losing that forced his coach of nine years, Doc Rivers, to relocate, with great irony, to the Clippers.

    “Right,” said Ainge. “It’s a really hard thing to do.”

    Without ever mentioning the name of the consensus No. 1 pick Andrew Wiggins, Ainge made it clear that he does not believe the Kansas freshman carries the value of Kevin Durant, with whom he is often compared.

    “If Kareem Abdul-Jabbar was out there to change your franchise forever, or Tim Duncan was going to change your franchise for 15 years? That might be a different story,” said Ainge. “I don’t see that player out there.”

    All of the Celtics’ old, experienced hope had been traded away as they opened training camp Monday with the unlikely — but not impossible, according to Ainge — goal of reaching the playoffs. The mood was nothing like years past. One longtime Boston journalist said it was the first time in 36 years he was covering a Celtics team that didn’t include a future Hall-of-Famer. The uniforms were familiar, but many of the faces and names were not.

    “I could see our team playing better than what some people think,” said Ainge. “But I could also see us having some struggles because we don’t really have that star. With the exception of Rondo, of course; but we don’t know when he’ll be back.”

    Rondo, recovering from ACL surgery on his right knee last February, said Monday he was unable to predict his return. When he does come back, will he be confident and comfortable enough to instantly regain his All-Star form? It would be unfair to expect so much so soon.

    “There [are] just so many questions to be answered with our personnel,” Ainge said. “It’s sort of exciting to go into a year and not really know what to expect.”

    The Celtics’ rookie coach Brad Stevens, a 36-year old hired away from Butler University in his native Indiana, was not at the top of Ainge’s list of variables for this season of transition. “I don’t think that’s going to prevent us from being a good team, or that he’s all of a sudden going to turn us into a great team,” said Ainge of Stevens’ inexperience. “His biggest thing will be how many adjustments do we make? Because he’ll know our opponents and their tendencies and he’ll know what we do and he’ll put in the work. His question will be, ‘Do we want to change our defense tonight, and can my players pick up this difference and can we make this adjustment?’ Those will be the types of things. Is he outsmarting himself by making the change or keeping it really simple because the players might not be able to make that adjustment?

    “I don’t have any question [about] his preparation or his intelligence. But experience, sure. I think his staff will be able to help him through all that.”

    He wished he could have straightened out the roster for Stevens. The Celtics have five big men who deserve to play, said Ainge, but there won’t be enough minutes for all of them. Shooting guard remains a mystery. There is no point guard to start in Rondo’s absence. And the best Celtics players to start the season, Gerald Wallace and Jeff Green, are both small forwards.

    “I’ve experienced that,” Ainge said of his four seasons as coach of the Suns, “where you win a game, but [there]’s not as much joy as you would like it to be because there’s three or four guys who are not happy with their roles. In a lot of ways you’re managing corporations, because how you play them and how many minutes they play and what roles they play have a great deal of effect on their career earnings. That’s going to be a tough deal for Brad this year, the logjams at the different positions.”

    And yet Ainge likes this roster more than the one he inherited when Boston hired him in 2003, or the one he handed over to Rivers as new coach of the Celtics one year later. The current goal, which surely could change based on the events of this season, is to renew the strategy that led to the 2007 trades for Ray Allen and Kevin Garnett: To develop the team’s current young talent and to draft well without necessarily earning a high choice in the lottery. Al Jefferson, who was the key player in the trade for Garnett, had come to the Celtics as a No. 15 pick three years earlier.

    “Rondo is a player that has value in our league, and there are teams that like him; there [are] questions about his injury,” said Ainge. “People like Jeff Green: He has great character, he has a decent contract for the kind of player that he can be. Jared Sullinger and Avery Bradley and Kelly Olynyk — all these guys have value. So that’s the good news. But you still need some breaks along the way. You still need to draft well and develop your players, and those players have to be wanted commodities around the league.”

    The model for all rebuilding teams is Oklahoma City, but Ainge doesn’t see how the Celtics could duplicate a plan that began around Durant as the No. 2 overall pick in 2007. “It might have been different if Greg Oden had been there and they drafted Greg Oden — they might not be who they are today,” said Ainge. The franchise endured four straight losing seasons, including a year of hell while leaving Seattle, to be followed by what Ainge called “almost a new free year” when the team was greeted in Oklahoma City by fans and sponsors who didn’t care that the 2008-09 Thunder were going to lose 59 games.

    “In Boston or in Phoenix or in other cities, people aren’t going to pay attention,” said Ainge. “And I don’t think people understand. It’s unrealistic to think that there’s only one way to win and that’s by losing to get better.”

    The other side of the dilemma is that the fans in Boston may be impatient after taking so much pride in the teams of Rivers, who is the league’s ultimate insider. When asked about the natural comparisons between Rivers and Stevens, Ainge responded with a message of perspective.

    “Listen, Doc did a great job for us and I’ll always be grateful for what he’s done,” said Ainge. “But because we struggled in the first few years of Doc’s tenure — struggled mightily — I think people sort of get it, and understand that it’s not always the coach. Now Doc’s going to a team that’s going to win 65 games. They won [56] games last year with injuries; Chris Paul missed [12] games. They won 17 in a row, and [now] their team is better. It’s upgraded significantly, in my opinion.

    “Our team is not made for 65 wins this year, and I know that before we even play a game. I think that Brad is so unique and different, and I think people are smart enough to understand that there were a lot of people on Doc’s case and on my case — [and] they should have been questioning things that were happening early on. Ultimately, it really is a players’ league, in that if you don’t have really good players, you can have Jerry West and Red Auerbach and Phil Jackson all on the same coaching staff and you still might not win.”

    Rivers told friends over the summer that he didn’t want to rebuild. Ainge signaled that he would spend this year reinforcing his view that a coach shouldn’t be judged solely by the record of his team — or that the comparative records of Rivers and Stevens shouldn’t necessarily reflect poorly on the new coach in Boston.

    “Through the whole thing,” said Ainge of their nine years together, “Doc was a stabilizing force. He was a leader of the team through thick and thin. He was no better the year that KG showed up and we won the championship than he was the year before when we lost [18] games in a row. He was no better a coach then. He just had the opportunity. Doc’s not going to be any better coach this year than he was last year when we were 41-40, but he’ll win 25 more games — at least — this upcoming year because he’s driving a faster car.”

    From that perspective, the worst thing Ainge could have done would have been to hire Stevens to a six-year contract and then dump all of his players of potential in exchange for draft picks that may never pan out. If the current team cannot win and there is a market for his players, it may reach the point when he is moving them. But that time had not yet come.

    “Those guys are all trying to win,” Ainge said of Wallace and Green and Rondo. “They don’t want to go out there and play for a draft pick. Brad Stevens in his first year as coach — he’s going to give a big pep talk about coming together as a team. How do you fake that? There’s not one thing fake about Brad Stevens. I think that’s why he’ll be able to sell it.”

    The practice gym was lined with the old banners and filled with new players. It was a strange opening day to launch a new unpredictable era.

    “If all of a sudden Rondo’s out for the year and a couple other key guys, and maybe goals change over the course of the year,” said Ainge, and then he stopped the dark thoughts there. “But starting the season out,” he carried on brightly, “we’re starting out full blazes. And see what we can do.”

    Read More: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/nba/news/20130930/boston-celtics-danny-ainge-brad-stevens/#ixzz2ggEaIaY9

    —————————————————

    0
  • #842667
    AvatarAvatar
    BothTeamsPlayedHard
    Participant

    WALTHAM, Mass. — For six years the question was whether the Celtics would win the championship. Now Danny Ainge finds himself overseeing a far less promising environment. All of the big names who played for or coached the championship team of 2007-08 are now in Los Angeles or Miami or Brooklyn or (in the case of Rajon Rondo) on indefinite leave. Instead of trying to win, should they now be trying to lose?

    “As I walk around town, more than anything else there are those that say, ‘Hey, don’t win too many games,”‘ said Ainge, the Celtics’ president of basketball operations. “There are so many fans that want us to play for the draft.”

    Ainge’s measured response is that they should be more careful what they wish for.

    “That’s harder than people recognize,” said Ainge of losing as a strategy. “It’s a really easy thing to conceptualize, and an easy thing to talk about and philosophize about. But it’s a hard thing to live through — for fans, for coaches, for owners, for sponsors, for our TV partners.”

    It was the pain of losing that forced his coach of nine years, Doc Rivers, to relocate, with great irony, to the Clippers.

    “Right,” said Ainge. “It’s a really hard thing to do.”

    Without ever mentioning the name of the consensus No. 1 pick Andrew Wiggins, Ainge made it clear that he does not believe the Kansas freshman carries the value of Kevin Durant, with whom he is often compared.

    “If Kareem Abdul-Jabbar was out there to change your franchise forever, or Tim Duncan was going to change your franchise for 15 years? That might be a different story,” said Ainge. “I don’t see that player out there.”

    All of the Celtics’ old, experienced hope had been traded away as they opened training camp Monday with the unlikely — but not impossible, according to Ainge — goal of reaching the playoffs. The mood was nothing like years past. One longtime Boston journalist said it was the first time in 36 years he was covering a Celtics team that didn’t include a future Hall-of-Famer. The uniforms were familiar, but many of the faces and names were not.

    “I could see our team playing better than what some people think,” said Ainge. “But I could also see us having some struggles because we don’t really have that star. With the exception of Rondo, of course; but we don’t know when he’ll be back.”

    Rondo, recovering from ACL surgery on his right knee last February, said Monday he was unable to predict his return. When he does come back, will he be confident and comfortable enough to instantly regain his All-Star form? It would be unfair to expect so much so soon.

    “There [are] just so many questions to be answered with our personnel,” Ainge said. “It’s sort of exciting to go into a year and not really know what to expect.”

    The Celtics’ rookie coach Brad Stevens, a 36-year old hired away from Butler University in his native Indiana, was not at the top of Ainge’s list of variables for this season of transition. “I don’t think that’s going to prevent us from being a good team, or that he’s all of a sudden going to turn us into a great team,” said Ainge of Stevens’ inexperience. “His biggest thing will be how many adjustments do we make? Because he’ll know our opponents and their tendencies and he’ll know what we do and he’ll put in the work. His question will be, ‘Do we want to change our defense tonight, and can my players pick up this difference and can we make this adjustment?’ Those will be the types of things. Is he outsmarting himself by making the change or keeping it really simple because the players might not be able to make that adjustment?

    “I don’t have any question [about] his preparation or his intelligence. But experience, sure. I think his staff will be able to help him through all that.”

    He wished he could have straightened out the roster for Stevens. The Celtics have five big men who deserve to play, said Ainge, but there won’t be enough minutes for all of them. Shooting guard remains a mystery. There is no point guard to start in Rondo’s absence. And the best Celtics players to start the season, Gerald Wallace and Jeff Green, are both small forwards.

    “I’ve experienced that,” Ainge said of his four seasons as coach of the Suns, “where you win a game, but [there]’s not as much joy as you would like it to be because there’s three or four guys who are not happy with their roles. In a lot of ways you’re managing corporations, because how you play them and how many minutes they play and what roles they play have a great deal of effect on their career earnings. That’s going to be a tough deal for Brad this year, the logjams at the different positions.”

    And yet Ainge likes this roster more than the one he inherited when Boston hired him in 2003, or the one he handed over to Rivers as new coach of the Celtics one year later. The current goal, which surely could change based on the events of this season, is to renew the strategy that led to the 2007 trades for Ray Allen and Kevin Garnett: To develop the team’s current young talent and to draft well without necessarily earning a high choice in the lottery. Al Jefferson, who was the key player in the trade for Garnett, had come to the Celtics as a No. 15 pick three years earlier.

    “Rondo is a player that has value in our league, and there are teams that like him; there [are] questions about his injury,” said Ainge. “People like Jeff Green: He has great character, he has a decent contract for the kind of player that he can be. Jared Sullinger and Avery Bradley and Kelly Olynyk — all these guys have value. So that’s the good news. But you still need some breaks along the way. You still need to draft well and develop your players, and those players have to be wanted commodities around the league.”

    The model for all rebuilding teams is Oklahoma City, but Ainge doesn’t see how the Celtics could duplicate a plan that began around Durant as the No. 2 overall pick in 2007. “It might have been different if Greg Oden had been there and they drafted Greg Oden — they might not be who they are today,” said Ainge. The franchise endured four straight losing seasons, including a year of hell while leaving Seattle, to be followed by what Ainge called “almost a new free year” when the team was greeted in Oklahoma City by fans and sponsors who didn’t care that the 2008-09 Thunder were going to lose 59 games.

    “In Boston or in Phoenix or in other cities, people aren’t going to pay attention,” said Ainge. “And I don’t think people understand. It’s unrealistic to think that there’s only one way to win and that’s by losing to get better.”

    The other side of the dilemma is that the fans in Boston may be impatient after taking so much pride in the teams of Rivers, who is the league’s ultimate insider. When asked about the natural comparisons between Rivers and Stevens, Ainge responded with a message of perspective.

    “Listen, Doc did a great job for us and I’ll always be grateful for what he’s done,” said Ainge. “But because we struggled in the first few years of Doc’s tenure — struggled mightily — I think people sort of get it, and understand that it’s not always the coach. Now Doc’s going to a team that’s going to win 65 games. They won [56] games last year with injuries; Chris Paul missed [12] games. They won 17 in a row, and [now] their team is better. It’s upgraded significantly, in my opinion.

    “Our team is not made for 65 wins this year, and I know that before we even play a game. I think that Brad is so unique and different, and I think people are smart enough to understand that there were a lot of people on Doc’s case and on my case — [and] they should have been questioning things that were happening early on. Ultimately, it really is a players’ league, in that if you don’t have really good players, you can have Jerry West and Red Auerbach and Phil Jackson all on the same coaching staff and you still might not win.”

    Rivers told friends over the summer that he didn’t want to rebuild. Ainge signaled that he would spend this year reinforcing his view that a coach shouldn’t be judged solely by the record of his team — or that the comparative records of Rivers and Stevens shouldn’t necessarily reflect poorly on the new coach in Boston.

    “Through the whole thing,” said Ainge of their nine years together, “Doc was a stabilizing force. He was a leader of the team through thick and thin. He was no better the year that KG showed up and we won the championship than he was the year before when we lost [18] games in a row. He was no better a coach then. He just had the opportunity. Doc’s not going to be any better coach this year than he was last year when we were 41-40, but he’ll win 25 more games — at least — this upcoming year because he’s driving a faster car.”

    From that perspective, the worst thing Ainge could have done would have been to hire Stevens to a six-year contract and then dump all of his players of potential in exchange for draft picks that may never pan out. If the current team cannot win and there is a market for his players, it may reach the point when he is moving them. But that time had not yet come.

    “Those guys are all trying to win,” Ainge said of Wallace and Green and Rondo. “They don’t want to go out there and play for a draft pick. Brad Stevens in his first year as coach — he’s going to give a big pep talk about coming together as a team. How do you fake that? There’s not one thing fake about Brad Stevens. I think that’s why he’ll be able to sell it.”

    The practice gym was lined with the old banners and filled with new players. It was a strange opening day to launch a new unpredictable era.

    “If all of a sudden Rondo’s out for the year and a couple other key guys, and maybe goals change over the course of the year,” said Ainge, and then he stopped the dark thoughts there. “But starting the season out,” he carried on brightly, “we’re starting out full blazes. And see what we can do.”

    Read More: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/nba/news/20130930/boston-celtics-danny-ainge-brad-stevens/#ixzz2ggEaIaY9

    —————————————————

    0

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login