This topic contains 50 replies, has 14 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar Hale 9 years, 11 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #55765
    AvatarAvatar
    db123
    Participant

     I think you guys are really underrating Wiggins. He will be a better player than Rudy Gay. For a player that’s offensively challenged as you say or with limited offensive ability he sure does know how to score. He had 41 points against West Virginia and 30 against Oklahoma state in back to back games. If he can score like this with having a limited offensive game then think about what he can do when he actually starts improving his offense. Not even putting out the fact that he averaged 17 a game. I think Cleveland should draft him number 1. 

    0
  • #908291
    AvatarAvatar
    Ballinmvp
    Participant

     I don’t think anyone is selling A. Wiggins short, I just think that embiid should be the #1 pick. I’m a huge wiggins fan too. Wiggins will be a solid player in the league.

    0
  • #908168
    AvatarAvatar
    Ballinmvp
    Participant

     I don’t think anyone is selling A. Wiggins short, I just think that embiid should be the #1 pick. I’m a huge wiggins fan too. Wiggins will be a solid player in the league.

    0
  • #908299
    AvatarAvatar
    NickWayne87
    Participant

     I think you’re underrating Rudy Gay who was also in contention for the number 1 pick of his draft though he didn’t ultimately go that high http://www.espn.go.com/nba/player/stats/_id3005/rudy-gay

     

    that looks like a career Andrew COULD have based on what we saw of him in college…..far short of the player he was hyped to be out of high school though….

     

     

     

    0
  • #908176
    AvatarAvatar
    NickWayne87
    Participant

     I think you’re underrating Rudy Gay who was also in contention for the number 1 pick of his draft though he didn’t ultimately go that high http://www.espn.go.com/nba/player/stats/_id3005/rudy-gay

     

    that looks like a career Andrew COULD have based on what we saw of him in college…..far short of the player he was hyped to be out of high school though….

     

     

     

    0
    • #908315
      AvatarAvatar
      Phogify
      Participant

      How Rudy Gay was projected out of high school doesn’t matter, we’re talking about the comparison to Rudy Gay now, not what Rudy Gay was hyped up to be as a collegiate athlete.

      0
    • #908191
      AvatarAvatar
      Phogify
      Participant

      How Rudy Gay was projected out of high school doesn’t matter, we’re talking about the comparison to Rudy Gay now, not what Rudy Gay was hyped up to be as a collegiate athlete.

      0
      • #908329
        AvatarAvatar
        tuck243
        Participant

         If we’re projecting him to Rudy now then you are basically saying he’s a mid range jump shooter…  Who does nothing for your team but score his own buckets…  Doesn’t play defense either…   I think when we compare players (at least me) we compare them at earlier stages of their NBA careers…  Also, give a slight projection on what they will end up as…  To compare today’s Jabari to today’s Melo is totally inaccurate…  Or an Embiid on May 26, 2014 to a primed Dream is dumb…  

        0
      • #908205
        AvatarAvatar
        tuck243
        Participant

         If we’re projecting him to Rudy now then you are basically saying he’s a mid range jump shooter…  Who does nothing for your team but score his own buckets…  Doesn’t play defense either…   I think when we compare players (at least me) we compare them at earlier stages of their NBA careers…  Also, give a slight projection on what they will end up as…  To compare today’s Jabari to today’s Melo is totally inaccurate…  Or an Embiid on May 26, 2014 to a primed Dream is dumb…  

        0
        • #908357
          AvatarAvatar
          Phogify
          Participant

           Nah, we are definitely making the comparison of what Wiggins will become, and I guess some people think he will become a Rudy Gay type of player. Personally, I think that comp is off as well, but what would be the point of comparing guys to their early careers rather than their prime?

          0
        • #908483
          AvatarAvatar
          Phogify
          Participant

           Nah, we are definitely making the comparison of what Wiggins will become, and I guess some people think he will become a Rudy Gay type of player. Personally, I think that comp is off as well, but what would be the point of comparing guys to their early careers rather than their prime?

          0
    • #908306
      AvatarAvatar
      Magic Jordan
      Participant

       It is impossible to underrate Rudy Gay.  He isn’t a good enough player to be "under rated" if you will.  In that sense he is properly rated, a selfish long range 2 point jump shooter who doesn’t bring much else to a team.  Teams get better when he leaves them.  

      0
      • #908359
        AvatarAvatar
        Phogify
        Participant

         I wonder when Kings fans will finally realize this.

        0
      • #908485
        AvatarAvatar
        Phogify
        Participant

         I wonder when Kings fans will finally realize this.

        0
    • #908431
      AvatarAvatar
      Magic Jordan
      Participant

       It is impossible to underrate Rudy Gay.  He isn’t a good enough player to be "under rated" if you will.  In that sense he is properly rated, a selfish long range 2 point jump shooter who doesn’t bring much else to a team.  Teams get better when he leaves them.  

      0
  • #908301
    AvatarAvatar
    jwall1
    Participant

     Wiggins got 80% of his points on free throws (way too many fouls called) and easy layups/dunks in transition. He will not be able to do this in the NBA which is why he needs to refine his offensive skills. I think the Rudy Gay comparison with a higher ceiling is a pretty accurated comparison. If Embiid has a clean bill of health, Cleveland would be idiotic to take Wiggins over him. 

    0
  • #908178
    AvatarAvatar
    jwall1
    Participant

     Wiggins got 80% of his points on free throws (way too many fouls called) and easy layups/dunks in transition. He will not be able to do this in the NBA which is why he needs to refine his offensive skills. I think the Rudy Gay comparison with a higher ceiling is a pretty accurated comparison. If Embiid has a clean bill of health, Cleveland would be idiotic to take Wiggins over him. 

    0
    • #908309
      AvatarAvatar
      Hale
      Participant

      80% of his points on free throws and easy layups/dunks in transition? Such an incredibly uninformed statement.

      0
    • #908186
      AvatarAvatar
      Hale
      Participant

      80% of his points on free throws and easy layups/dunks in transition? Such an incredibly uninformed statement.

      0
    • #908311
      AvatarAvatar
      JoeWolf1

      While I understand your point, you’re greatly exaggerating. Wiggins hit 43 three pointers, which is good for 129 points and 21% of his total output. He also did a great deal of slashing and got a lot of points off put backs due to his super quick 2nd jumps.

      29% of his points were made off free throws. KU was not a transition based, fast paced team. Wiggins’ points, primarily came in the half court. I much more realistic % for FT and fast break points, would be about 45%. He also only took 6.5 FT’s per game, that’s hardly the Jordan treatment, and inaccurate to blame on bad calls.

      0
    • #908188
      AvatarAvatar
      JoeWolf1

      While I understand your point, you’re greatly exaggerating. Wiggins hit 43 three pointers, which is good for 129 points and 21% of his total output. He also did a great deal of slashing and got a lot of points off put backs due to his super quick 2nd jumps.

      29% of his points were made off free throws. KU was not a transition based, fast paced team. Wiggins’ points, primarily came in the half court. I much more realistic % for FT and fast break points, would be about 45%. He also only took 6.5 FT’s per game, that’s hardly the Jordan treatment, and inaccurate to blame on bad calls.

      0
  • #908305
    AvatarAvatar
    NickWayne87
    Participant

     here it is http://www.espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/3005/rudy-gay……..as i said that looks like a career andrew could have….look at Gay in college http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCso8qP_Mm4

    it’s not an insult….its just short of what you may want for him based on what his hype train led you to believe

     

     

    0
  • #908182
    AvatarAvatar
    NickWayne87
    Participant

     here it is http://www.espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/3005/rudy-gay……..as i said that looks like a career andrew could have….look at Gay in college http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCso8qP_Mm4

    it’s not an insult….its just short of what you may want for him based on what his hype train led you to believe

     

     

    0
  • #908331
    AvatarAvatar
    tuck243
    Participant

     They couldn’t shoot…  Wiggins and Embiid were unable to show us their games on a constant basis…  Embiid progressed over the year, but even when he did play a decent amount of minutes it was a small sample size because of that zone…   I would be careful to say Wiggins is "hype"….  

    0
  • #908207
    AvatarAvatar
    tuck243
    Participant

     They couldn’t shoot…  Wiggins and Embiid were unable to show us their games on a constant basis…  Embiid progressed over the year, but even when he did play a decent amount of minutes it was a small sample size because of that zone…   I would be careful to say Wiggins is "hype"….  

    0
  • #908379
    AvatarAvatar
    tbest23
    Participant

     I think once he becomes more consistent on his shot selection he’ll be a beast on offense. The thing I notice about Wiggins is his defense is very good. His lateral quickness, his length and overall athleticism is very good on the defensive end. Most really good players in the league are known for what they do on offense. KD, Melo, Curry, Griffin, etc. are really great on one end, the other not so much. Wiggins has a chance to be very special. Embiid seems to have great potential on both ends as well. Parker reallllly needs to work on his defense. A lot of good players in the draft. Hopefully the Bulls don’t screw up with their 2 first rounders. 

    0
  • #908254
    AvatarAvatar
    tbest23
    Participant

     I think once he becomes more consistent on his shot selection he’ll be a beast on offense. The thing I notice about Wiggins is his defense is very good. His lateral quickness, his length and overall athleticism is very good on the defensive end. Most really good players in the league are known for what they do on offense. KD, Melo, Curry, Griffin, etc. are really great on one end, the other not so much. Wiggins has a chance to be very special. Embiid seems to have great potential on both ends as well. Parker reallllly needs to work on his defense. A lot of good players in the draft. Hopefully the Bulls don’t screw up with their 2 first rounders. 

    0
  • #908409
    festar35festar35
    festar35
    Participant

    The guy he resembles is Paul George, the difference will be who can be the more consistent offensive option.

    To me PG is a capable 20-23ppg guy, but I feel that Wiggins can be better than that. It only depends who attacks the hoop more.

    0
  • #908284
    festar35festar35
    festar35
    Participant

    The guy he resembles is Paul George, the difference will be who can be the more consistent offensive option.

    To me PG is a capable 20-23ppg guy, but I feel that Wiggins can be better than that. It only depends who attacks the hoop more.

    0
  • #908336
    AvatarAvatar
    Pro-21
    Participant

    I was amazed by how un-guard like he seemed this year. He has an incredible first step, length and vertical leap, but his fluidity and ability to create his own shot seemed non-existent. In his high school tape he seemed like a 6’8" Dwade. At Kansas, he looked far, far less adept in shot creating than Jabari Parker. Then you look at his lack of touch around the rim. For all of his run/jump athleticism, he looked very stiff too me when slashing. Very straight-lined. He is nothing like Kobe Bryant, Dwade, Kyrie Irving or even Dion Waiters when it comes to penetrating. Wiggins is at least as quick as all of them, but their handle enables them to slither into the paint and explode to the rim the way Adrian Peterson does out of the back court. They can toss up shots at ridiculous angles and get them to fall. Reverse Layups, body contorting shots, twisting drives, etc. I just didn’t see any hint of that at Kansas. I understand that they faced a lot of zone and didn’t really have knock down shooters, I feel that if he had the abilities he would have shown them at some point. I saw the quickness, but not the fluidity of a shooting guard, and maybe average fluidity for a small forward.

    He did put up an impressive statline though. That gives me hope, but still, there are many question marks around Wiggins game.

    0
  • #908461
    AvatarAvatar
    Pro-21
    Participant

    I was amazed by how un-guard like he seemed this year. He has an incredible first step, length and vertical leap, but his fluidity and ability to create his own shot seemed non-existent. In his high school tape he seemed like a 6’8" Dwade. At Kansas, he looked far, far less adept in shot creating than Jabari Parker. Then you look at his lack of touch around the rim. For all of his run/jump athleticism, he looked very stiff too me when slashing. Very straight-lined. He is nothing like Kobe Bryant, Dwade, Kyrie Irving or even Dion Waiters when it comes to penetrating. Wiggins is at least as quick as all of them, but their handle enables them to slither into the paint and explode to the rim the way Adrian Peterson does out of the back court. They can toss up shots at ridiculous angles and get them to fall. Reverse Layups, body contorting shots, twisting drives, etc. I just didn’t see any hint of that at Kansas. I understand that they faced a lot of zone and didn’t really have knock down shooters, I feel that if he had the abilities he would have shown them at some point. I saw the quickness, but not the fluidity of a shooting guard, and maybe average fluidity for a small forward.

    He did put up an impressive statline though. That gives me hope, but still, there are many question marks around Wiggins game.

    0
  • #908373
    AvatarAvatar
    The8thDeadlySin
    Participant

     Im tired of hearing about his 41 vs WVU.  I watched every game WVU played last year.  Do you know who was guarding Wiggins that whole game?  Eron Harris, a 6’2 SG that was a great spot up shooter and was the higest scoring SG in the Big 12.  He was anything but a defender.  He will never be in the NBA..  In that game, Wiggins got about 10 points out of the diamond press and if my memory is correct, he shot like 15 free throws.  Also, Perry Ellis stayed in foul trouble.  They needed someone to score and Wiggins was the guy that took extra shots..

    I didnt see the OKS game but their go to defender was 6’3 Markel Brown.  A 6’8 guard should abuse a 6’3 guard..

    0
    • #908378
      AvatarAvatar
      JoeWolf1

      You’re 100% right about the WVU game. He wreaked havoc in that press. It was still a jaw dropping performance by Wiggins, but he was everywhere. I came away more impressed by his defense and athletic ability being completely unleashed than the fact he dropped 41. How many guys shred press break by a team with an All Big 12 point guard so bad that it leads to 10 points? Impressive.

      He didn’t just abuse small guards, though. He had success against Parker, 19 and 19 against Melvin Ejim, the OSU game he got covered by a lot of guys, Smart, Nash and Williams included. Just because his 41 came against a small team, you can’t assume it was 1 on 1 vs Brown or that he can only beat small guards.

      0
    • #908505
      AvatarAvatar
      JoeWolf1

      You’re 100% right about the WVU game. He wreaked havoc in that press. It was still a jaw dropping performance by Wiggins, but he was everywhere. I came away more impressed by his defense and athletic ability being completely unleashed than the fact he dropped 41. How many guys shred press break by a team with an All Big 12 point guard so bad that it leads to 10 points? Impressive.

      He didn’t just abuse small guards, though. He had success against Parker, 19 and 19 against Melvin Ejim, the OSU game he got covered by a lot of guys, Smart, Nash and Williams included. Just because his 41 came against a small team, you can’t assume it was 1 on 1 vs Brown or that he can only beat small guards.

      0
  • #908499
    AvatarAvatar
    The8thDeadlySin
    Participant

     Im tired of hearing about his 41 vs WVU.  I watched every game WVU played last year.  Do you know who was guarding Wiggins that whole game?  Eron Harris, a 6’2 SG that was a great spot up shooter and was the higest scoring SG in the Big 12.  He was anything but a defender.  He will never be in the NBA..  In that game, Wiggins got about 10 points out of the diamond press and if my memory is correct, he shot like 15 free throws.  Also, Perry Ellis stayed in foul trouble.  They needed someone to score and Wiggins was the guy that took extra shots..

    I didnt see the OKS game but their go to defender was 6’3 Markel Brown.  A 6’8 guard should abuse a 6’3 guard..

    0
  • #908382
    AvatarAvatar
    Hale
    Participant

    You sound awfully bitter about a game you won. He scored 41. If WVU is dumb enough to let a 6’2 guard cover a 6’8 wing then that is there fault. Also considering it was one of only two times all year a player scored over 30 against WVU, I’m going to say it was damn well deserved. 

    0
  • #908509
    AvatarAvatar
    Hale
    Participant

    You sound awfully bitter about a game you won. He scored 41. If WVU is dumb enough to let a 6’2 guard cover a 6’8 wing then that is there fault. Also considering it was one of only two times all year a player scored over 30 against WVU, I’m going to say it was damn well deserved. 

    0
  • #908392
    AvatarAvatar
    The8thDeadlySin
    Participant

    I’m not bitter. However, NBA teams dont press and he will never see a 6’2 defender in the NBA. It was very impressive. I just dont think it means anything. And like Joe said that game was more about him being athletic than him scoring. Its just that every time someone says Wiggins doesnt have a killer instinct, people point to this WVU game. Those people are usually box score readers instead of game watchers.

    Fanboys will call me “bitter” or a hater but truth is, the WVU game was the exception. He does not have a killer instinct.

    He is not Scottie Pippen. He is not Clyde Drexler. He is not Dominique Wilkins. He will be good, not great.

    IMO, and call me a hater or whatever you want, he is Nichols Batum. Thats only if he buys into playing good defense every night. If he doesn’t, he is Gerald Green.

    0
    • #908398
      AvatarAvatar
      Hale
      Participant

      I won’t call you a hater. I’ll call you misinformed. He showed a killer instinct multiple times throughout the year with the best example being against Duke. So many people mistake his lack of emotion for a lack of effort/killer instinct and it’s sickening. T-Mac played the same way and he had a killer instinct. Wiggins is probably the most unfairly judged player I’ve seen since LeBron. It’s ridiculous the levels people go to just to try and discredit everything he does.

      0
      • #908402
        AvatarAvatar
        The8thDeadlySin
        Participant

         I didnt watch every game he played.  However, i saw him a lot in HS because he was here in WV.  I know his HS coach personally and have had multiple convos with him about Wiggins.  I wont say exactly what i was told but Andrew was forced to score a lot of times.  He doesn’t do it naturally.  Maybe his year at Kansas changed that.

        I am not trying to discredit Wiggins.  He is an amazing athlete but he is mostly potiental.  Its a dangerous word.  I see him more as a do it all glue man rather than a 25 points a night guy.  

        0
        • #908410
          AvatarAvatar
          Hale
          Participant

          I see where you’re coming from but everyone said these same things about Demar Derozan. Passive, can’t shoot, can’t handle, scored of dunks, and is an athlete not a basketball player. Well now he’s an All Star who just averaged 23 ppg. Wiggins is not only far better than Derozan at the same stage, he’s a better shooter, athlete and defender than current Derozan. That bodes well for him. 

          0
        • #908537
          AvatarAvatar
          Hale
          Participant

          I see where you’re coming from but everyone said these same things about Demar Derozan. Passive, can’t shoot, can’t handle, scored of dunks, and is an athlete not a basketball player. Well now he’s an All Star who just averaged 23 ppg. Wiggins is not only far better than Derozan at the same stage, he’s a better shooter, athlete and defender than current Derozan. That bodes well for him. 

          0
      • #908529
        AvatarAvatar
        The8thDeadlySin
        Participant

         I didnt watch every game he played.  However, i saw him a lot in HS because he was here in WV.  I know his HS coach personally and have had multiple convos with him about Wiggins.  I wont say exactly what i was told but Andrew was forced to score a lot of times.  He doesn’t do it naturally.  Maybe his year at Kansas changed that.

        I am not trying to discredit Wiggins.  He is an amazing athlete but he is mostly potiental.  Its a dangerous word.  I see him more as a do it all glue man rather than a 25 points a night guy.  

        0
    • #908525
      AvatarAvatar
      Hale
      Participant

      I won’t call you a hater. I’ll call you misinformed. He showed a killer instinct multiple times throughout the year with the best example being against Duke. So many people mistake his lack of emotion for a lack of effort/killer instinct and it’s sickening. T-Mac played the same way and he had a killer instinct. Wiggins is probably the most unfairly judged player I’ve seen since LeBron. It’s ridiculous the levels people go to just to try and discredit everything he does.

      0
  • #908519
    AvatarAvatar
    The8thDeadlySin
    Participant

    I’m not bitter. However, NBA teams dont press and he will never see a 6’2 defender in the NBA. It was very impressive. I just dont think it means anything. And like Joe said that game was more about him being athletic than him scoring. Its just that every time someone says Wiggins doesnt have a killer instinct, people point to this WVU game. Those people are usually box score readers instead of game watchers.

    Fanboys will call me “bitter” or a hater but truth is, the WVU game was the exception. He does not have a killer instinct.

    He is not Scottie Pippen. He is not Clyde Drexler. He is not Dominique Wilkins. He will be good, not great.

    IMO, and call me a hater or whatever you want, he is Nichols Batum. Thats only if he buys into playing good defense every night. If he doesn’t, he is Gerald Green.

    0
  • #908549
    AvatarAvatar
    Ballinmvp
    Participant

    Only time will tell, I honestly don’t see him dominating out the gate but a couple years and then we can see.

    0
  • #908422
    AvatarAvatar
    Ballinmvp
    Participant

    Only time will tell, I honestly don’t see him dominating out the gate but a couple years and then we can see.

    0
  • #908559
    AvatarAvatar
    deshawynkeys91
    Participant

    hale there is no way wiggins is a better shooter than derozan right now.  Derozan has one of the best mid range game in the league.  However if wiggins has the work ethic that derozan has that is going to be the greatest factor to weather he succeed or not.

    0
  • #908432
    AvatarAvatar
    deshawynkeys91
    Participant

    hale there is no way wiggins is a better shooter than derozan right now.  Derozan has one of the best mid range game in the league.  However if wiggins has the work ethic that derozan has that is going to be the greatest factor to weather he succeed or not.

    0
    • #908571
      AvatarAvatar
      Hale
      Participant

      He’s not one of the best midrange shooters in the league. The league average on shots from 16-23 feet is 38.3%. Derozan shot 39.56%. He’s basically league average. Wiggins is absolutely a better shooter from beyond the arc and I’d be willing to bet next season he’ll be right around league average from midrange too. Maybe I shouldn’t have said Wiggins is a better overall shooter now but I’ll bet he catches up very quickly. He’s shown way more ability at the same stage.

       

       

       

       

       

      0
    • #908444
      AvatarAvatar
      Hale
      Participant

      He’s not one of the best midrange shooters in the league. The league average on shots from 16-23 feet is 38.3%. Derozan shot 39.56%. He’s basically league average. Wiggins is absolutely a better shooter from beyond the arc and I’d be willing to bet next season he’ll be right around league average from midrange too. Maybe I shouldn’t have said Wiggins is a better overall shooter now but I’ll bet he catches up very quickly. He’s shown way more ability at the same stage.

       

       

       

       

       

      0

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login