share

Andrea Bargnani's ranking amongs the elite PF

mess.eee
mess.eee's picture
Registered User
Joined: 04/18/2010
Posts: 1942
Points: 4979
Offline
Andrea Bargnani's ranking amongs the elite PF

Although Bargnani plays C for the Raptors (to my knowledge), his best position is best suited as a PF. So where would you rank him amongs top NBA PF? Top 10? Maybe top 5? And which team would he best fit in (besides his current team)?


The UnderKanter
Registered User
Joined: 06/12/2009
Posts: 2637
Points: 404
Offline
Magic, as for the ranking

Magic, as for the ranking umm, top 15 maybe top 10.

Scottoant93
Scottoant93's picture
Registered User
Joined: 04/04/2009
Posts: 2403
Points: 4962
Offline
I would say top 15 off the

I would say top 15 off the top my head, he would do so much better on a better team with a good center and a good coach who can develop him right then, he might be top 10

mess.eee
mess.eee's picture
Registered User
Joined: 04/18/2010
Posts: 1942
Points: 4979
Offline
Top 15 seems like a low

Top 15 seems like a low ranking for him specially for a 20ppg scorer.

Hale
Hale's picture
Registered User
Joined: 05/08/2009
Posts: 5954
Points: 12848
Offline
Duncan, Dirk, Amare, Griffin,

Duncan, Dirk, Amare, Griffin, LA, Love, Pau, Boozer, Garnett, Bosh, D-West and whoever you want to consider the PF for Atlanta (Smith, Horford) I would take before Bargnani. There may be more but I just wanted to put a quick list.

Scottoant93
Scottoant93's picture
Registered User
Joined: 04/04/2009
Posts: 2403
Points: 4962
Offline
I like bargnani but he

I like bargnani but he doesn't have the skill set to get him in the top ten. He needs a mentor to develop him more then he could get in the top 10

ghrghr
Registered User
Joined: 09/25/2010
Posts: 207
Points: 305
Offline
Bargnani is a good player,

Bargnani is a good player, but the league is really deep at PF.

Just look at the west, a lot of teams have their best player at that position: San Antonio, Dallas, Portland, Memphis, LAC, Minnesota

second best: LAL, New Orleans, Houston, Utah, Sacramento (Cousins is starting at PF with Dalembert at C)

(Some may not agree on who are the best players on each team, but that's not the point)

Costy15
Costy15's picture
Registered User
Joined: 09/06/2010
Posts: 372
Points: 649
Offline
Hes probly somewhere in the

Hes probly somewhere in the 15-20 range imo. Hes a top 10 scorer but he just plain cant play defense which is half the game. He is always late on defensive rotations, and has a horrbile defensive IQ. He didnt even record a block in the month of February. Gotta put defense into account when ranking players and Bargnani is just plain horrible on the defensive side of the ball.

nateoak10
nateoak10's picture
Registered User
Joined: 03/22/2009
Posts: 1635
Points: 1793
Offline
I consider Duncan a Center

He rebounds like a SG and defendes like a water cooler. Not top 10

1. Gasol

2. Dirk

3. Stat

4. Griffin

5. Aldridge/CB

6. Boozer

7. KG

8. Love

9. JSmith

10.West

11. Lee

12. Millsap/Blair

13. Hickson/Ibaka (Killing it right now)

14. Scola

15. Brand

16. Frye

17. Kmart

18. Blatche

19. Then maybe Bargs but Tyrus Thomas is a pushing for this spot

nateoak10
nateoak10's picture
Registered User
Joined: 03/22/2009
Posts: 1635
Points: 1793
Offline
I really hate bigs who play like guards

Too me they seem useless ,why not just have a SG who does the exact same things as Bargs and get a tougher big? Makes no sense. He's a more hyped Radmonovic

Dale Worthington
Dale Worthington's picture
Registered User
Joined: 01/17/2009
Posts: 1423
Points: 1694
Offline
Why is Bargnani even

Why is Bargnani even considered a PF or C? He doesn't rebound at all and does his damage outside.

Im Your Father
Im Your Father's picture
Registered User
Joined: 06/06/2009
Posts: 1231
Points: 1696
Online
Zach Randolph is better than

Zach Randolph is better than him too and definitely belongs on that list nateoak.

nateoak10
nateoak10's picture
Registered User
Joined: 03/22/2009
Posts: 1635
Points: 1793
Offline
I just forgot about him

He's top 10 imo

mess.eee
mess.eee's picture
Registered User
Joined: 04/18/2010
Posts: 1942
Points: 4979
Offline
@ nateoak

There is no way Blatche,Frye, and Hickson better than Bargnani. I know he sucks on defense but he is far better than those guys.

nateoak10
nateoak10's picture
Registered User
Joined: 03/22/2009
Posts: 1635
Points: 1793
Offline
Hickson is killing it since the AS break

Better defender and not as soft offensively and can still put up a solid PPg. Frye is basically the same on offense but a better defender a rebounder and Blatche is more versatile while being a better rebounder.

Having an overgrown SG play up front will never be effective

TeamShowtimeLakers
TeamShowtimeLakers's picture
Registered User
Joined: 12/03/2008
Posts: 262
Points: 174
Offline
maybe a top 15 power

maybe a top 15 power forward....with the best team probaly being either the magic or like the lakers.

immaletufinishbut
immaletufinishbut's picture
Registered User
Joined: 10/06/2010
Posts: 103
Points: 129
Offline
15 thru 20 easy

15 thru 20 easy

OhCanada-
OhCanada-'s picture
Registered User
Joined: 05/08/2010
Posts: 6052
Points: 6002
Offline
1.Gasol 2.Nowizki 3.Garnett 4

1.Gasol
2.Nowizki
3.Garnett
4.Stoudemire
5.Bosh
6.Aldridge
7.Horford (I consider him a PF just like Bargnani is)
8.Boozer
9.West
10.Love
11.Griffin
12.Ibaka
13.Scola
14.Brand
15.Lee
16.Bargnani
17.Millsap

think the best fit for Bargnani personal;ly is Toronto. He fits into the Euro marketing scheme, gets praised for playin no D which seems to keep him healthy. I think if he stays injury free he could have a very very long career. He gets 10 mil a year, is the least active player on the floor every other night, and at the end of the day is named a "team leader".

I think the best team for Bargnani to be effective would be the Milwaukee Bucks mostly because they actaully need the scoring, and a stretch 4. Great defensive effort and activity demanded throughout the entire team, and an excellent low post threat in Bogut, not to mention someone who will provide enough rebounding and blocked shots to make up for Bargnanis weakness's. Having a great scorer like Bargnani on the floor could really help Milwaukee space the floor, and help jennings become a more effiencient playmaker first and scorer second. Salmons, Redd, CDR, Magette, etc. would get more open shots. Bogut could get some rest and Bargnani could get some minutes at C playing small, he rarely ever is iured and is one of the most durable bgs in the game.

HotSnot
Registered User
Joined: 05/20/2010
Posts: 739
Points: -1421
Offline
If I was an NBA GM I wouldn't

If I was an NBA GM I wouldn't even want Bargs on my team. He has too many holes in his game. Barg's best case scenario is as the first big off the bench. His intensity would probably pick up if you cut his minutes back to 20-25 a game. Too often he looks like he's just going through the motions and I've never seen him "take over" a game. He's a very average player who was pushed into a scoring role. There are so many PF's and C's who if they were given Barg's opportunity they would put up even better stats. James Johnson couldn't even get off the bench in Chi but is a productive player since starting for the Raps. It shows he can play. Imagine if Johnson had 4 years of steady playing time under his belt and was given the chance to play through mistakes like Bargs was. There's no telling what he could turn into. Barg's is what he is... which is to say, disappointing.

M-DYMES
M-DYMES's picture
Registered User
Joined: 12/14/2009
Posts: 2643
Points: 6868
Offline
I'm sorry but Channing Frye

I'm sorry but Channing Frye shouldn't even be in your thought process for an elite PF. Dude can shoot from outside, that is about it. The only reason he is a PF is because he is tall, otherwise he might as well be a lesser version of Peja.

Pureshooter
Pureshooter's picture
Registered User
Joined: 05/04/2009
Posts: 768
Points: 1046
Offline
I think he's around #15 right

I think he's around #15 right now, but he still has some serious upside. You don't find many guys with his combination of mobility, size and skill. If he was in the right situation he could be top 10.

TaylorCondrin
TaylorCondrin's picture
Registered User
Joined: 04/14/2009
Posts: 4433
Points: 8032
Offline
id say in the 14-18

id say in the 14-18 range...here is a list of all the NBA starting PF's in my opinion

1) Pau Gasol

2) Dirk Nowitzki

3) Amare Stoudemire

4) Carlos Boozer

5) LaMarcus Aldridge

6) Chris Bosh

7) Kevin Garnett

8) Blake Griffin

9) Kevin Love

10) Zach Randolph

11) Paul Millsap

12) Josh Smith

13) David West

14) David Lee

15) Luis Scola

16) Bargnani

17) Elton Brand

18) DeMarcus Cousins

19) Serge Ibaka

20) Andray Blatche

21) Channing Frye

22) DeJuan Blair

23) JJ Hickson

24) Kris Humphries

25) Brandon Bass

26) Boris Diaw

27) Kenyon Martin

28) Tyler Hansbrough

29) Luc Richard Mbah A Moute

30) Chris Wilcox

mikeyvthedon
mikeyvthedon's picture
Registered User
Joined: 06/13/2008
Posts: 5612
Points: 13268
Offline
^ Nice list

I would probably make slight changes, but I think Bargnani is probably in about the right place. Yes, he is a 20 ppg scorer, but everyone ranked ahead of him has a definite reason. If you are going to say his ranking is too low for a 20 ppg scorer, is it too low for someone who averages under 6 boards per game in about 36 minutes? His rebounding and defense are what keeps him from being amongst the elite. 14-18 is probably a good place for him right now, and while he is maybe one of the better scoring PF's in the league, his all-around game leaves a lot to be desired. Any team he plays on you will need to make up for him on the glass and on D, something the Raptors have not been able to do which is why they have been a really bad team, even with Bargnani putting up over 20 ppg.

RSS: Syndicate content